Skip to main content

Singapore From Social Democracy to Communitarianism

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbuch Kommunitarismus

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Geisteswissenschaften ((SPREFGEIST))

Abstract

Singapore has been ruled by a single party, the People’s Action Party, since its political independence in 1965. The history of the party’s rise to monopolistic parliamentary power was strewn with political repressions of radical left, throughout the entire Cold War period. It was without doubt a history of authoritarianism. At the same time, it had achieved spectacular national economic success within global capitalism, spawned an expansive middle class and improved the material life of Singaporeans across the board. In defiance of the current hegemonic liberal democratic capitalism, the ruling Singapore government has very explicitly rejected American liberalism as the necessary end point of Singapore’s political ideological development. Instead, drawing on its root as a social democratic party, it has reworked and reinscribed the idea of the ‘social’ and weaved it into a ‘communitarianism’, with supposedly Asian characters distilled from its multiracial citizenry. The concept of the social/collective/communitarian in practice is institutionalized in the universal provision of public housing through a national housing program, the redistribution of gains generated by state capitalism through the subvention of the annual national budget and the governing of race through the insistence on racial harmony as a public good. Arguably, it is the concrete benefits delivered by these institutions which have the collective well-being as the core value that explains the longevity of the People’s Action Party in parliamentary power rather than its diminishing authoritarianism in these post-Cold War days.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Bell has since then embraced a more collective definition of communitarianism based on his reading of Confucian philosophy, see Bell and Hahm (2003).

  2. 2.

    Many were imprisoned without trial in excess of 10 years, with the longest for 23 years. Only in the past few years were counter historical narratives and memories published by the detainees, protesting their innocence from alleged communism (Poh et al. 2013).

  3. 3.

    In 1983, the first Minister of Finance, Goh Keng Swee, set up the Institute of East Asian Philosophies in Singapore to research the possible link between Confucianism and economic growth. Unsurprisingly, the Institute’s very first conference aimed to compare Confucianism and Weber’s thesis on protestant ethics and capitalism (Tu 1991).

  4. 4.

    “White Paper on Shared Values,” presented in Parliament by PM Goh on 3 January 1991 (Straits Times 4 Jan. 1991).

  5. 5.

    The idea that “Asian” are essentially communitarian-oriented predictably flew into a storm of scepticism and criticism from inside and outside Asia, as a thin veil for authoritarianism. The debate around “Asian Values” abated after 1997, when the Asian Financial Crisis put a stop to the seemingly sustainable rapid economic development in East Asia, which in turn stopped the triumphal touting of Asian values among political leaders and their thought-supporters.

  6. 6.

    The Act was amended in 1973 to allow the state to compensate owners of acquired land at the 1973 market value or the land’s value at the date of notification, depending on which was lower.

  7. 7.

    An individual’s CPF is unevenly apportioned into three different accounts: ordinary, medical and special accounts. Only the ordinary account, which constitutes the largest portion, can be used for housing. Housing consumption is about 60% of the annual pre-retirement withdrawal from CPF.

  8. 8.

    Over the years, the public housing system as an asset based social welfare scheme has accumulated numerous systemic contradictions which require the ruling government to constantly monitor and manage, without permanent solutions (Chua 2014, 2015).

  9. 9.

    Space limitation does not permit the discussion of the investments by the Government Investment Corporation and the Monetary Authority of Singapore, which invest national reserves.

  10. 10.

    The elected team also constitutes the town council which is responsible for the management of the public housing estates within the GRC.

References

  • Bell, Daniel A. 2004. Communitarian philosophy and East Asian politics. In Communitarian politics in Asia, ed. Chua Beng Huat, 25–45. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Daniel A. 2008. China’s new confucianism: Politics and everyday life in a changing society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Daniel A., and Hahm Chaibong, eds. 2003. Confucianism for the modern world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, John. 1986. On the political construction of tradition: Gotong Royong in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Studies 45(3): 545–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Kyung Sup. 2009. The Anti-communitarian family? Everyday conditions of authoritarian politics in South Korea.” In Communitarian politics in Asia, ed. Chua Beng Huat, 57–77. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, Partha. 2011. Linages of political society: Studies in postcolonial democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Jie, and Lan Deng. 2014. Financing affordable housing through compulsory saving: The two-decade experience of housing provident fund in China. Housing Studies 29(7): 937–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Siok Wah. 1991. Economic change and industrialization. In A history of Singapore, eds. Ernest C. T. Chew and Edwin Lee, 182–215. Singapore: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, Beng Huat. 1995. Communitarianism and democracy in singapore. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, Beng Huat. 1999. Asian values’ discourse and the resurrection of the social. Positions: East Asian Culture Critiques 7(2): 573–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, Beng Huat, ed. 2000. Consumption in Asia: Lifestyles and identities. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, Beng Huat. 2014. Navigating between limits: Future of public housing in Singapore. Housing Studies 29(4): 520–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, Beng Huat. 2015. Financializing public housing as an asset for retirement in Singapore. International Journal of Housing Policy 15(4): 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallmayr, Fred. 1996. Democracy and multiculturalism. In Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political, ed. Seyla Benhabib, 278–294. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Deborah. 2005. Urban consumer culture. In Culture in contemporary China, eds. M. Hockx and J. Strauss, 170–187. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, Amitai, ed. 1998. The essential communitarian reader. Boulder: Rowan and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The end of history and the last man. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh, Keng Swee. 1972. Socialism in Singapore. In The Economic of Modernization, ed. Goh Keng Swee, 209–15. Singapore: Asia Pacific Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, John. 1995. Enlightenment’s wake: Politics and culture at the close of the modern age. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Han, Fook Kwong, et al. 2011. Lee Kuan Yew: Hard truths to keep Singapore going. Singapore: Straits Time Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heryanto, Ariel. 2008. Pop culture and competing identities. In Popular culture in Indonesia: Fluid identities in Post-authoritarian Politics, ed. Ariel Heryanto, 1–36. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayasuriya, Kanishka. 2007. The rule of law and capitalism in Asia. The Pacific Review 9(3): 367–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, Joel. 2006. Other Malays: Nationalism and cosmopolitanism in the modern Malay world. Singapore: Singapore University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim Dae, Jung. 1994. Is culture destiny? The myth of Asia’s anti-democratic values. Foreign Affairs 73(6): 189–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, T. T. B. 1967. The law of compulsory land acquisition in Singapore. The Malayan Law Journal 35: 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, Eddie C. Y. 1989. The promotion of confucian ethics in Singapore: A sociological analysis. Singapore: Commentary 7: 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, Eddie C.Y., Jon Quah, and Tong Chee Kiong. 1988. Religion and religious revivalism in Singapore. Singapore: Ministry of Community Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Kuan Yew. 2016. A chance of a lifetime. Interview with Liu Thai Ker. In A chance of a lifetime: Lee Kuan Yew and the physical transformation of Singapore, 16–19. Singapore: Centre for Liveable Cities and the Lee Kuan Yew Centre for Innovative Cities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lew, Seok-Choon, Woo-Young Choi, and Hye Suk Wang. 2011. Confucian ethics and the spirit of capitalism in Korea: The significance of filial piety. Journal of East Asian Studies 11(1): 171–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, G. C., and Ezra Vogel, eds. 1987. Ideology and national competitiveness: An analysis of nine countries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, Linda. 2003. Sustaining the competitiveness of Singapore Inc.in the knowledge based global economy. In Sustaining Competitiveness in the New Global Economy, ed. Ramkishen S. Rajan, 135–50. Cheltenham, UK: Institute of Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, Steven. 1973. Individualism. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFarquar, Roderick. 1980. The post-Confucian challenge. Economist, 9 Feb.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauzy, Diane K., and R. S. Milne. 2002. Singapore politics under the people’s action party. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudhall, Stephen, and Adam Swift. 1992. Liberals and communitarians. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasir, Kamaludeen Mohamed, and Syed Muhd Khairudin Aljunied. 2009. Muslims as minorities: History and social realities of muslims in Singapore. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, Aihwa. 2006. Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ow, Chin Hock. 1976. Singapore. In The role of public enterprise in national development in Southeast Asia: problems and prospects, ed. Nguyen-Truong, 153–254. Singapore: Regional Institute of Higher Education Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poh, Soo Kai, Kok Fang Tan, and Lysa Hong, eds. 2013. The 1963 operation coldstore in Singapore: Commemorating 50 years. Kuala Lumpur: Strategic Information and Development Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, Lily Zubaidah. 1998. The Singapore dilemma: The political and educational marginality of the malay community. Singapore: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajah, Jothie. 2012. Authoritarian rule of law: legislation, discourse and legitimacy in Singapore. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robison, Richard. 1996. The politics of Asian values. The Pacific Review 9(3): 309–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodan, Garry. 1989. The political economy of Singapore’s industrialization: National state and international capital. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodan, Garry, and Caroline Hughes. 2014. The politics of accountability in Southeast Asia: The dominance of moral ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, Edgar H. 1996. Strategic Pragmatism: The culture of the EDB. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Tai Yong. 2001. Singapore: Civil-military fusion. In Coercion and government: The declining political role of the military in Asia, ed. M. Alagappa, 276–293. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Tai Yong. 2008. Creating Greater Malaysia: Decolonization and politics of merger. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Kenneth Paul. 2013. Meritocracy and political liberalization in Singapore. In The East Asian challenge for democracy: Political meritocracy in comparative perspective, eds. Daniel A. Bell and Chenyang Li, 314–339. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, Weiming, ed. 1991. The Triadic chord: Confucian ethics, industrial East Asia and Max Weber. Singapore: Institute of East Asian Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasu, Norman. 2012. Governance through difference in Singapore. Asian Survey 52(4): 734–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visscher, Sikko. 2007. The business of politics and ethnicity: A history of the Singapore Chinese chamber of commerce and industry. Singapore: NUS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, Ezra. 1979. Japan as number one: Lessons for America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Leonard. 1997. American liberalism and ideological change. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Aline K., and Stephen H. K. Yeh, eds. 1985. Housing a Nation: 25 years of public housing in Singapore. Singapore: Housing and Development Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, B. 1997. Consumerism, confucianism, communism: making sense of China today. New Left Review 222: 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beng Huat Chua .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Chua, B. (2018). Singapore From Social Democracy to Communitarianism. In: Reese-Schäfer, W. (eds) Handbuch Kommunitarismus. Springer Reference Geisteswissenschaften. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16864-3_31-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16864-3_31-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-16864-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-16864-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Sozialwissenschaften und Recht

Publish with us

Policies and ethics