Skip to main content

The Effect of New Public Management Reforms on Climate Change Adaptive Capacity: A Comparison of Urban Planning and the Electricity Sector

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Climate Change Adaptation

Abstract

From the mid-1980s and onwards, a number of public institutions in Western democracies were subject to New Public Management (NPM) reforms, applying management tools from the private sector, oriented towards outcomes and efficiency. The chapter identifies organizational factors that influence adaptive capacity to climate change and finds that the NPM reforms have changed the sectors, significantly reducing adaptive capacity to climate change. In urban planning project planning has been moved to private actors, undermining formal responsibility for adaptation. In addition, an increased focus on efficiency and short-term market orientation has reduced adaptive capacity. For the electricity sector, the revolutionary change with the reform in 1991 led to an abrupt undermining of adaptive capacity. The radical change in incentive structures, from encouraging security of supply to an extreme focus on economic efficiency, downplayed robustness and adaptation. The change in formal structure is followed by a corresponding professional demographic change which further undermines adaptive capacity. Whereas both sectors were previously dominated by engineers focusing on robustness of constructions and maintenance, many economists focusing on cost reduction and economic efficiency were employed as a result of NPM reforms.

The chapter shows that adaptive capacity to climate change is influenced by a wide set of organizational factors beyond the traditional discussions, which have important practical implications for public administration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bye T, Hope E (2006) Electricity market reform – the Norwegian experience. In: Sørgard L (ed) Competition and welfare: The Norwegian experience. Norwegian Competition Authority, Bergen

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen T, Lægreid P (2001) A transformative perspective on administrative reforms. In: Christensen T, Lægreid P (eds) New public management. The transformation of ideas and practice. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen T, Røvik KA (1999) The ambiguity of appropriateness. In: Egeberg M, Legreid P (eds) Organizing political institutions. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo, pp 159–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen T, Lie A, Lægreid P (2007) Still fragmented government or reassertion of the centre? In: Christensen T, Lægreid P (eds) Transcending new public management. The transformation of public sector reforms. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Eakin H, Eriksen S, Eikeland PO, Øyen C (2011) Public sector reform and governance for adaptation: implications of new public management for adaptive capacity in Mexico and Norway. Environ Manag 47(3):338–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen S, Selboe E (2011) The social organisation of adaptation to climate variability and global change: the case of a mountain farming community in Norway. Appl Geogr 33:159–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falleth EI, Hanssen GS, Saglie IL (2010) Challenges to democracy in market-oriented urban planning in Norway. Auropean Planning Studies 18(5): 737–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R (2008) Introduction. In: Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R (eds) The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory R (2001) Transforming governmental culture: a sceptical view of new public management. In: Christensen T, Lægreid P (eds) New public management. The transformation of ideas and practice. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvold K, Risan L (2010) Kommunal klima- og energiplanlegging. NIBR: Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanssen GS, Saglie IL (2010) Cognitive closure in urban planning. Plan Theory Pract 11(4):491–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Høegh J, Pettersen J, Johansen IH, Bowitz E (2004) Regulering av bytransformasjon. ECON Analyse, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntjens P, Lebel L, Pahl-Wostl C, Camkin J, Schulze R, Kranz N (2012) Institutional design propositions for the governance of adaptation to climate change in the water sector. Glob Environ Change 22:67–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inderberg TH (2011) Institutional constraints to adaptive capacity: adaptability to climate change in the Norwegian electricity sector. Local Environ 16(4):303–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inderberg TH, Arntzen Løchen L (2012) Adaptation to climate change among electricity distribution companies in Norway and Sweden: lessons from the field. Local Environ 17(6–7: Special issue on Nordic Climate Change):663–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Quin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Contribution of working group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Klausen JE, Saglie IL, Stokke KB, Windsvold M Forthcoming 2015: Planning for climate change adaptation in urban areas. In: O’Brien K Selboe E (eds) The Adaptive Challenge of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleven T (2011) Fra gjenreisning til samfunnsplanlegging. Norsk kommuneplanlegging 1965–2004. Tapir akademiske forlag, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Langset T, Trengereid F, Samdal K, Heggeset J (2001) Quality dependent revenue caps – a model for quality of supply regulation. In: CIRED, 16th international conference and exhibition on (IEE conference publication no 482). IEE Conference publication, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury M (2007) A tale of two cities: competing logics and practice variation in the professionalization of mutual funds. Acad Manag J 50(2):289–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäntysalo R, Saglie IL, Cars G (2011) Between input legitimacy and output efficiency: defensive routines and agonistic reflectivity in Nordic land-use planning. Eur Plan Stud 19(12):2109–2126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March JG (1994) A primer on decision-making. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • March JG, Olsen JP (1989) Rediscovering institutions: the organizational basis of politics. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Midttun A (1996) Electricity liberalization policies in Norway and Sweden. Political trade offs under cognitive limitations. Energy Policy 24(1):53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midttun A, Summerton J (1998) Loyalty or competition? A comparative analysis of Norwegian and Swedish electricity distributors’ adaptation to market reform. Energy Policy 26(2):143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moen B, Harvold K, Strand A (2004) Byutviklingskonsulenten : fagekspert eller prosessaktivist i spenningsfeltet mellom det private initiativ og den offentlige vanmakt? NIBR, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordahl B (2006) Deciding on development: collaboration between markets and local government, institute of urban design and planning, faculty of architecture and fine art. NTNU, Trondheim

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien K, Eriksen S, Sygna L, Naess LO (2006) Questioning complacency: climate change impacts, vulnerability, and adaptation in Norway. Ambio 35(2):50–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien K, Leichenko RM (2008) Environmental change and globalisation: double exposures. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Olje- og energidepartementet (1990) Lov om produksjon, omforming, overføring, omsetning, fordeling og bruk av energi m.m. (energiloven)

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen PI (2000) Transforming economies. The case of the Norwegian electricity market reform. Norwegian School of Management BI, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter M (2001) Policy capacity and the effects of new public management. In: Christensen T, Lægreid P (eds) New public management. The transformation of ideas and practice. Ashgate, Hampshire, pp 209–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Palm J (2008) Emergency management in the Swedish electricity market: the need to challenge the responsibility gap. Energy Policy 36(2):843–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reay T, Hinings CR (2009) Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organ Stud 30(6):629–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit B, Pilifosova O (2003) From Adaptation to Adaptive Capacity and Vulnerability Reduction. In Joel B, Smith, Klein, Richard JT, and Huq, Saleemul (eds) Climate Change, Adaptive Capacity and Development, 9-28. London: Imperial College Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore C (2008) Audit culture and illiberal governance. Anthropol Theory 8(3):278–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker G (1998) Governance as theory: five propositions. Int Soc Sci J 50(1):17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton PH, Ocasio W (2008) Institutional logics. In: Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R (eds) The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Thue L (1996) Strøm og styring. Ad Notam Gyldendal AS, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel SK (1996) Freer markets, more rules. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tor Håkon Inderberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Inderberg, T.H., Stokke, K.B., Winsvold, M. (2014). The Effect of New Public Management Reforms on Climate Change Adaptive Capacity: A Comparison of Urban Planning and the Electricity Sector. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Handbook of Climate Change Adaptation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40455-9_83-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40455-9_83-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40455-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics