Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mixed Method Research in Palliative Care

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Textbook of Palliative Care

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the use of mixed methods research designs in palliative care. Mixing methods is increasing in popularity as a research approach, but study quality can be poor. This chapter highlights key issues and resources for those interested in mixed methods research, to encourage researchers to focus on important principles and debates to inform study planning. First, the defining features of mixed methods research are explored and definitions presented. Second, the paradigm challenges of mixed methods research are discussed, with a focus on current epistemological thinking in the area. Third, the issues of design are presented. This includes consideration of the purpose of mixed methods studies, a continuum of study characteristics, and a typology of core mixed methods designs. Approaches to mixing data are given particular consideration. Barriers to high-quality mixed methods studies are presented and recommendations on mixed methods research in palliative care discussed. Throughout, contemporary examples from palliative care mixed methods research are used to illustrate key points.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 819.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bausewein C, Daveson BA, Currow DC, Downing J, Deliens L, Radbruch L, et al. EAPC white paper on outcome measurement in palliative care: improving practice, attaining outcomes and delivering quality services – recommendations from the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) task force on outcome measurement. Palliat Med. 2016;30(1):6–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bergenholtz H, Jarlbaek L, Hølge-Hazelton B. Generalist palliative care in hospital – cultural and organisational interactions. Results of a mixed-methods study. Palliat Med. 2016;30(6):558–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer J, Hunter A. Multimethod research: a synthesis of styles. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown KM, Elliott SJ, Leatherdale ST, Robertson-Wilson J. Searching for rigour in the reporting of mixed methods population health research: a methodological review. Health Educ Res. 2015;30(6):811–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman A. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qual Res. 2006;6(1):97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman A. Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. J Mixed Methods Res. 2007;1(1):8–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman A. Social research methods. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke Johnson R, Stefurak T. Considering the evidence-and-credibility discussion in evaluation through the Lens of dialectical pluralism. N Dir Eval. 2013;2013(138):37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt J, Raine R. The effect of age on referral to and use of specialist palliative care services in adult cancer patients: a systematic review. Age Ageing. 2006;35(5):469–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burt J, Plant H, Omar R, Raine R. Equity of use of specialist palliative care by age: cross-sectional study of lung cancer patients. Palliat Med. 2010;24(6):641–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins KM, O’Cathain A. Introduction: ten points about mixed methods research to be considered by the novice researcher. Int J Mult Res Approach. 2009;3(1):2–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins KM, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Sutton IL. A model incorporating the rationale and purpose for conducting mixed methods research in special education and beyond. Learn Disabil: Contemp J. 2006;4(1):67–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins KM, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Johnson RB. Securing a place at the table: a review and extension of legitimation criteria for the conduct of mixed research. Am Behav Sci. 2012;56(6):849–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyle CE, Schulman-Green D, Feder S, Toraman S, Prust ML, Plano Clark VL, et al. Federal funding for mixed methods research in the health sciences in the United States: recent trends. J Mixed Methods Res. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816662578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW, Plano Clark V. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 3rd ed. Sage: Los Angeles; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell J, Klassen A, Plano Clark V, Smith K, Research OoBaSS. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health science. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health; 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dalkin SM, Jones D, Lhussier M, et al. Understanding integrated care pathways in palliative care using realist evaluation: a mixed methods study protocol BMJ Open 2012;2:e001533. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001533.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dalkin SM, Lhussier M, Philipson P, Jones D, Cunningham W. Reducing inequalities in care for patients with non-malignant diseases: insights from a realist evaluation of an integrated palliative care pathway. Palliat Med. 2016;30(7):690–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Almeida Mello J, Hermans K, Van Audenhove C, Macq J, Declercq A. Evaluations of home care interventions for frail older persons using the interRAI home care instrument: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(2):173.e1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denscombe M. Communities of practice: a research paradigm for the mixed methods approach. J Mixed Methods Res. 2008;2(3):270–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodd S, Hill M, Ockenden N, Algorta GP, Preston N, Payne S, Walshe C. ‘Being with’ or ‘doing for’? How the role of an end-of-life volunteer befriender can impact patient wellbeing: interviews from a multiple qualitative case study (ELSA). Support Care Cancer 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4169-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fàbregues S, Molina-Azorín JF. Addressing quality in mixed methods research: a review and recommendations for a future agenda. Qual Quant. 2017;51(6):2847–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar M, Higginson I, Fagan P, Booth S. The feasibility of a single-blinded fast-track pragmatic randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention for breathlessness in advanced disease. BMC Palliat Care. 2009;8(1):9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar MC, Ewing G, Booth S. Using mixed methods to develop and evaluate complex interventions in palliative care research. Palliat Med. 2011a;25(8):748–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar M, Prevost AT, McCrone P, Higginson I, Gray J, Brafman-Kennedy B, et al. Study protocol: phase III single-blinded fast-track pragmatic randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention for breathlessness in advanced disease. Trials. 2011b;12(1):130.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar M, Preston N, Evans CJ, Grande G, Short V, Benalia H, et al. Mixed methods research in the development and evaluation of complex interventions in palliative and end-of-life care: report on the MORECare consensus exercise. J Palliat Med. 2013;16(12):1550–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar MC, Prevost AT, McCrone P, Brafman-Price B, Bentley A, Higginson IJ, et al. Is a specialist breathlessness service more effective and cost-effective for patients with advanced cancer and their carers than standard care? Findings of a mixed-method randomised controlled trial. BMC Med. 2014;12:194.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar MC, Prevost AT, McCrone P, Brafman-Price B, Bentley A, Higginson IJ, et al. The clinical and cost effectiveness of a breathlessness intervention service for patients with advanced non-malignant disease and their informal carers: mixed findings of a mixed method randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17(1):1–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fetters MD, Curry LA, Creswell JW. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Serv Res. 2013;48(6 Pt 2):2134–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Flemming K, Adamson J, Atkin K. Improving the effectiveness of interventions in palliative care: the potential role of qualitative research in enhancing evidence from randomized controlled trials. Palliat Med. 2008;22(2):123–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Florczak KL. Purists need not apply: the case for pragmatism in mixed methods research. Nurs Sci Q. 2014;27(4):278–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grant A, Treweek S, Dreischulte T, Foy R, Guthrie B. Process evaluations for cluster-randomised trials of complex interventions: a proposed framework for design and reporting. Trials. 2013;14:15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Greene JC. Advances in mixed-method evaluation: the challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene JC. Toward a methodology of mixed methods social inquiry. Res School. 2006;13(1):93–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene JC. Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Wiley; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene JC. Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? J Mixed Methods Res. 2008;2(1):7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene JC, Hall JN. Dialectics and pragmatism: being of consequence. In: Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Los Angeles: Sage; 2010. p. 119–43.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greene JC, Caracelli VJ, Graham WF. Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educ Eval Policy Anal. 1989;11(3):255–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Q, Chochinov HM, McClement S, Thompson G, Hack T. Development and evaluation of the dignity talk question framework for palliative patients and their families: a mixed-methods study. Palliat Med. 2018;32(1):195–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216317734696.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans K, Spruytte N, Cohen J, Van Audenhove C, Declercq A. Informed palliative care in nursing homes through the interRAI palliative care instrument: a study protocol based on the Medical Research Council framework. BMC Geriatr. 2014;14:132.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans K, Spruytte N, Cohen J, Van Audenhove C, Declercq A. Usefulness, feasibility and face validity of the interRAI palliative care instrument according to care professionals in nursing homes: a qualitative study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;62:90–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans K, De Almeida Mello J, Spruytte N, Cohen J, Van Audenhove C, Declercq A. Does using the interRAI palliative care instrument reduce the needs and symptoms of nursing home residents receiving palliative care? Palliat Support Care. 2018;16(1):32–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951517000153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higginson I, Evans C, Grande G, Preston N, Morgan M, McCrone P, et al. Evaluating complex interventions in end of life care: the MORECare statement on good practice generated by a synthesis of transparent expert consultations and systematic reviews. BMC Med. 2014;11(111). https://doi.org/10.1186/741-7015-11-111.

  • Highet G, Crawford D, Murray SA, Boyd K. Development and evaluation of the supportive and palliative care indicators tool (SPICT): a mixed-methods study. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2014;4(3):285–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hosie A, Agar M, Lobb E, Davidson PM, Phillips J. Improving delirium recognition and assessment for people receiving inpatient palliative care: a mixed methods meta-synthesis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017;75:123–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ. Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res. 2004;33(7):14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Turner LA. Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J Mixed Methods Res. 2007;1(2):112–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leech NL, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Combs JP. Writing publishable mixed research articles: guidelines for emerging scholars in the health sciences and beyond. Int J Mult Res Approaches. 2011;5(1):7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin S, Glenton C, Oxman AD. Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study BMJ 2009; 339 :b3496

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry, vol. 1985. Beverley Hills: Sage; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnan L, Steckler A. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell JA, Loomis DM. Mixed methods design: an alternative approach. In: Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, vol. 1. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2003. p. 241–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell JA, Mittapalli K. Realism as a stance for mixed methods research. In: Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2010. p. 145–68.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens DM. Mixed methods and the politics of human research: the transformative-emancipatory perspective. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, editors. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2003. p. 135–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles M, Huberman A. Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan DL. Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: applications to health research. Qual Health Res. 1998;8(3):362–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan DL. Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. J Mixed Methods Res. 2007;1(1):48–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morita T, Miyashita M, Yamagishi A, Akizuki N, Kizawa Y, Shirahige Y, et al. A region-based palliative care intervention trial using the mixed-method approach: Japan OPTIM study. BMC Palliat Care. 2012;11(1):2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Morita T, Miyashita M, Yamagishi A, Akiyama M, Akizuki N, Hirai K, et al. Effects of a programme of interventions on regional comprehensive palliative care for patients with cancer: a mixed-methods study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(7):638–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morse JM. Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, editors. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. 1. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2003. p. 189–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7(1):85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13(2):92–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Cathain A, Nicholl J, Murphy E. Structural issues affecting mixed methods studies in health research: a qualitative study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9(1):82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ. 2010;341:c4587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, Allen E, Stephenson J. Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ. 2006;332(7538):413–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie AJ, Johnson RB. The validity issue in mixed research. Res Schools. 2006;13(1):48–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie AJ, Leech NL. Validity and qualitative research: an oxymoron? Qual Quant. 2007;41(2):233–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie AJ, Johnson RB, Collins KM. Assessing legitimation in mixed research: a new framework. Qual Quant. 2011;45(6):1253–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Östlund U, Kidd L, Wengström Y, Rowa-Dewar N. Combining qualitative and quantitative research within mixed method research designs: a methodological review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48(3):369–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Patton M. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson A, White H, Bath-Hextall F, Salmond S, Apostolo J, Kirkpatrick P. A mixed-methods approach to systematic reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):121–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pelto PJ. What is so new about mixed methods? Qual Health Res. 2015;25(6):734–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pluye P, Gagnon MP, Griffiths F, Johnson-Lafleur J. A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46(4):529–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preston NJ, Fayers P, Walters SJ, Pilling M, Grande GE, Short V, et al. Recommendations for managing missing data, attrition and response shift in palliative and end-of-life care research: part of the MORECare research method guidance on statistical issues. Palliat Med. 2013;27(10):899–907.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preston NJ, Farquhar MC, Walshe CE, Stevinson C, Ewing G, Calman LA, et al. Strategies designed to help healthcare professionals to recruit participants to research studies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sale JE, Lohfeld LH, Brazil K. Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: implications for mixed-methods research. Qual Quant. 2002;36(1):43–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski M, Voils CI, Knafl G. On quantitizing. Journal of mixed methods research. 2009;3(3):208–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski M, Voils CI, Leeman J, Crandell JL. Mapping the mixed methods-mixed research synthesis terrain. J Mixed Methods Res. 2012;6(4):317–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selman L, Speck P, Gysels M, Agupio G, Dinat N, Downing J, et al. ‘Peace’ and ‘life worthwhile’ as measures of spiritual well-being in African palliative care: a mixed-methods study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11(1):94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stefurak T, Burke Johnson R, Shatto E. Mixed methods and dialectical pluralism. In: Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015. p. 345.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tariq S, Woodman J. Using mixed methods in health research. JRSM Short Rep. 2013;4(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/2042533313479197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori A, Cresswell JW. The new era of mixed methods. J Mixed Methods Res. 2007;1(1):5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walshe C, Algorta GP, Dodd S, Hill M, Ockenden N, Payne S. Protocol for the end-of-life social action study (ELSA): a randomised wait-list controlled trial and embedded qualitative case study evaluation assessing the causal impact of social action befriending services on end of life experience. BMC Palliat Care. 2016a; 15:60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-016-0134-3.

  • Walshe CD, Dodd S, Hill M, Ockenden N, Payne S, Perez Algorta G, Preston N. What is the impact of social action befriending services at the end-of-life? Evaluation of the end of life social action fund. Lancaster: Lancaster University; 2016b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walshe C, Dodd S, Hill M, Ockenden N, Payne S, Preston N, et al. How effective are volunteers at supporting people in their last year of life? A pragmatic randomised wait-list trial in palliative care (ELSA). BMC Med. 2016c;14(1):203.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • White C, Hardy J. Gatekeeping from palliative care research trials. Prog Palliat Care. 2008;16(4):167–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisdom JP, Cavaleri MA, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Green CA. Methodological reporting in qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods health services research articles. Health Serv Res. 2012;47(2):721–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zweers D, de Graaf E, Teunissen S. Suitable support for anxious hospice patients: what do nurses ‘know’, ‘do’ and ‘need’? An explanatory mixed method study. BMJ Supportive & Palliative CarePublished Online First: 30 June 2017. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001187.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK

    Catherine Walshe

Authors
  1. Catherine Walshe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Walshe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Medicine,Palliative Care, HammondCare, The University of Sydney School of Medicine, Sydney, Australia

    Roderick Duncan MacLeod

  2. VUB-UGhent End-of-Life Care Research Group, Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care and Department of Clinical Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium

    Lieve Van den Block

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Walshe, C. (2019). Mixed Method Research in Palliative Care. In: MacLeod, R., Van den Block, L. (eds) Textbook of Palliative Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77740-5_109

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation