Skip to main content

Ethical Considerations in Psychology Research

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity
  • 261 Accesses

Abstract

Research in psychology covers two main fields: furthering the understanding of the whole, complex gamut of processes that are involved in everyday human experience and behavior and developing methods for treating mental health problems. While the ethics of research and practice in this latter field falls largely within the general ambit of medical ethics, psychology research outside this domain involves some quite specific ethics issues in addition to those common across social sciences. Professional bodies of psychologists have developed specific codes and guidance for the ethical conduct of research, offering best practice guidance. There are several enduring ethics concerns for psychology researchers that are covered in this chapter. These include the validity of consent, how to ethically manage withholding information from participants, or deceiving them, where this is a necessary part of the research design. Also, with the growth in Internet-based research, genomics, and neuroimaging, psychologists have had to develop new ways of maintaining standards and compliance with ethical principles of the discipline. New approaches have required development to manage issues of consent, especially with children and young people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aarts AA et al. (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349:943–950

    Google Scholar 

  • Altus D, Morris E (2009) B. F. Skinner’s utopian vision: behind and beyond Walden Two. Behav Anal 32:319–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association (2017) Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker M, van Dijk A, Wicherts J (2012) The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspect Psychol Sci 7:543–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks S (2018) Cultivating researcher integrity: virtue-based approaches to research ethics. In: Emmerich N (ed) Virtue ethics in the conduct and governance of social science research. Bingley, Emerald

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohannon J (2015) Many psychology papers fail replication test. Science 349:910–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boynton M, Portnoy D, Johnson B (2013) Exploring the ethics and psychological impact of deception in psychological research. IRB 35:7–13

    Google Scholar 

  • British Psychological Society (2005) Declaration concerning torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment. British Psychological Society, Leicester

    Google Scholar 

  • British Psychological Society (2014) Code of human research ethics. British Psychological Society, Leicester

    Google Scholar 

  • British Psychological Society (2015) Guidance on teaching and assessment of ethical competence in psychology education. British Psychological Society, Leicester

    Google Scholar 

  • British Psychological Society (2017) Ethics guidelines for Internet-mediated research. INF206/04.2017. Leicester. http://www.bps.org.uk/publications/policy-and-guidelines/research-guidelines-policy-documents/researchguidelines-poli

  • British Psychological Society (2018) Code of ethics and conduct. British Psychological Society, Leicester

    Google Scholar 

  • Budin-Ljøsne I, Teare HJA, Kaye J, Beck S, Bentzen HB, Caenazzo L, Collett C, D’Abramo F, Felzmann H, Finlay T, Javaid MK, Jones E, Katić V, Simpson A, Mascalzoni D (2017) Dynamic consent: a potential solution to some of the challenges of modern biomedical research. BMC Med Ethics:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings JA, Day TE (2019) But what do participants want? Comment on the “data sharing in psychology” special section (2018). Am Psychol 74:245–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmerich N (2018) Virtue ethics in the conduct and governance of social science research. Emerald Publishing, Bingley

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer G (2015) On the supposed evidence for libertarian paternalism. Rev Philos Psychol 6:361–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haney C, Banks C, Zimbardo P (1973). A study of prisoners and guards in a simulated prison. Naval Res Rev 9: 1-17. Office of Naval Research, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera CD (2001) Ethics, deception, and ‘those milgram experiments’. J Appl Philos 18:245–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel J (1996) Ethical issues in behavioral research. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay G, Koene C, Øvreeide H, Lang F (2008) Ethics for European psychologists. Göttingen, Hogrefe

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram S (1963) Behavioral study of obedience. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 67:371–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orwell G (1949) Nineteen eighty-four. Secker and Warburg, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest J (1982) A psychologist looks at the teaching of ethics. Hast Cent Rep 12:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozemond M (1998) Descartes’ dualism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sclenker B, Forsyth D (1977) On the ethics of psychological research. J Exp Soc Psychol 13:369–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner BF (1948) Walden two. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner BF (1985) Cognitive science and behaviourism. Br J Psychol 76:291–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg DS, Keil FC, Goodstein J, Rawson E, Gray JR (2008) The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. J Cogn Neurosci 20:470–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickelgren I (1999) Discovery of ‘gay gene’ questioned. Science 284:571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanow D, Schwartz-Shea P (2018) Framing “deception” and “covertness” in research: do milgram, humphreys, and zimbardo justify regulating social science research ethics? Forum Qual Soc Res 19:1–31

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Oates .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Oates, J. (2019). Ethical Considerations in Psychology Research. In: Iphofen, R. (eds) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_35-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_35-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76040-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76040-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics