Skip to main content

Social Security: Long-Term Financing and Reform

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging

Definition

The term “social security: long-term financing and reform” is used to denote the analysis and study of policies oriented to guarantee the long-run sustainability of social security systems. Focusing on pension systems, the principle of the social security system is to guarantee benefits when retired that are financed by contributions during working ages. The sustainability of a social security system is guaranteed if benefits paid out are covered by contributions to the system. Alternatively, sustainability of a social security system may be less stringently defined by requiring that the debt per worker of the social security system remains constant over time. Based on future projections of liabilities and revenues of social security programs, different reform scenarios can be developed. Parametric reforms of social security systems are targeted toward changes in either benefits, or contributions, or retirement ages. Structural reforms of social security systems denote the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Auerbach AJ, Lee R (2011) Welfare and generational equity in sustainable unfunded pension systems. J Public Econ 95(1):16–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard O, Chouraqui JC, Hagemann RP, Sartor N (1990) The sustainability of fiscal policy: new answers to an old question. OECD Econ Stud 15:7–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgmann CH (2005) Social security, demographics, and risk. Population Economics. Springer Science & Business Media. Springer Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Börsch-Supan A (2006) What are NDC systems? What do they bring to reform strategies? Pension reform: Issues and prospects for non-financial defined contribution (NDC) schemes, 35–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Boskin M, Shoven J (2009) Concept and measures of earnings replacement rates during retirement. In: Bodie Z, Shoven J, Wise D (eds) Pensions and retirement in the United States. NBER, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 113–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovenberg L, Van der Linden A (1997) Pension policies and the aging society. OECD Obs 205:10–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo E, Haverstick K, Sass SA (2009) Gradual retirement, sense of control, and retirees’ happiness. Res Aging 31(1):112–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chetty R, Stepner M, Abraham S, Lin S, Scuderi B, Turner N, Bergeron A, Cutler D (2016) The association between income and life expectancy in the United States, 2001–2014. J Am Med Assoc 315(14):1750–1766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conde-Ruiz JI, González CI (2016) From Bismarck to Beveridge: the other pension reform in Spain. SERIEs 7(4):461–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudel C, Ott N, Werding M (2016) Maintaining one’s living standard at old age: what does that mean? Empir Econ 51(3):1261–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr H (2016) CGE modeling social security reforms. J Policy Model 38(3):475–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr H, Habermann C, Kindermann F (2008) Social security with rational and hyperbolic consumers. Rev Econ Dyn 11:884–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein M (1974) Social security, induced retirement, and aggregate capital accumulation. J Polit Econ 82(5):905–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenge R (1995) Pareto-efficiency of the pay-as-you-go pension system with intragenerational fairness. FinanzArchiv 52:357–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber J, Wise DA (1999) Social security and retirement around the world. University Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzmann R, Palmer E (2006) Pension reform: issues and prospects for non-financial defined contribution (NDC) schemes. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holzmann R, Hinz P R, Mark D (2008) Pension systems and reform conceptual framework. Social Protection and Labor Policy and Technical Notes 46175, The World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzmann R, Palmer E, Robalino D (2012) Nonfinancial defined contribution pension schemes in a changing pension world: volume 1. Progress, lessons, and implementation. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holzmann R, Palmer E, Robalino D (2013) Nonfinancial defined contribution pension schemes in a changing pension world: volume 2. Gender, politics, and financial stability. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzmann R, Palmer E, Palacios R, Sacchi S (2019) Progress and challenges of nonfinancial defined pension schemes: volume 1. Addressing marginalization, polarization, and the labor market. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd M, Michaud PC, Rohwedder S (2012) The displacement effect of public pensions on the accumulation of financial assets. Fisc Stud 33(1):107–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knell M (2017) Actuarial deductions for early retirement. Working Paper series of the Oesterreichische Nationalbank, WP 215

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2015) The growing gap in life expectancy by income: implications for federal programs and policy responses. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishiyama S, Smetters KA (2007) Does social security privatization produce efficiency gains? Q J Econ 122(4):1677–1719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2017) Preventing ageing unequally. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2019) Gross pension replacement rates (indicator). https://doi.org/10.1787/3d1afeb1-en. Accessed 15 Feb 2019

  • Pestieau P, Ponthiere G (2016) Longevity variations and the welfare state. J Demogr Econ 82(2):207–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson PA (1958) An exact consumption-loan model of interest with or without the social contrivance of money. J Polit Econ 66(6):467–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Romero M, Prskawetz A (2017) Redistributive effects of the US pension system among individuals with different life expectancy. J Econ Ageing 10:51–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Romero M, Sambt J, Prskawetz A (2013) Quantifying the role of alternative pension reforms on the Austrian economy. Labour Econ 22:94–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Romero M, Lee R, Prskawetz A (2019) Redistributive effects of different pension structures when longevity varies by socioeconomic status. NBER Working Papers 25944. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz J, Seshadri A, Khitatrakun S (2006) Are Americans saving ‘optimally’ for retirement? J Polit Econ 114:607–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Settergren O, Mikula BD (2005) The rate of return of pay-as-you-go pension systems: a more exact consumption-loan model of interest. J Pension Econ Finance 4(2):115–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2017) World population prospects: the 2017 revision, DVD Edition. Internet: https://population.un.org/wpp/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel Sánchez-Romero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Appendix

Appendix

Basic Sustainability Equation

The following equation represents the basic equation for the evolution of debt/fund of the pension system at time t:

$$ \frac{\mathrm{dD}(t)}{\mathrm{dt}}= rD(t)-T(t)+N\left(0,t\right){\int}_R^{\omega }{e}^{- na}l(a)b\left(a,t\right) da-\tau (t)N\left(0,t\right){\int}_E^R{e}^{- na}l(a){y}_l\left(a,t\right) da, $$
(A.1)

where D(t) is the total debt at time t, r is the interest rate, T(t) denotes the total taxes levied to finance the pension system, N(0, t) denotes the babies born at time t, R is the age at retirement, ω is the maximum lifespan (See “Maximum Lifespan”), n is the population growth rate, l(a) is the probability of surviving to age a, b(a, t) is the pension benefit at age a at time t, τ(t) is the social contribution rate, E is the length of schooling, and y l(a, t) is the labor income at age a at time t.

By expressing Eq. A.1 in terms of the debt per potential worker at time t – i.e., \( d(t)=\frac{D(t)}{L(t)} \), where L(t) is the total potential working age population – the social security budget constraint becomes:

$$ \frac{\partial d(t)}{\partial t}=\left(r-n\right)d(t)-\frac{T(t)}{L(t)}+\frac{\int_R^{\omega }{e}^{- na}l(a)b\left(a,t\right) da}{\int_E^R{e}^{- na}l(a) da}-\tau (t)\frac{\int_E^R{e}^{- na}l(a){y}_l\left(a,t\right) da}{\int_E^R{e}^{- na}l(a) da}. $$
(A.2)

Defining the average pension benefit at time t, b(t), and the average labor income at time t, y l (t), as

$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}b(t)=\frac{\int_R^{\omega }{e}^{- na}l(a)b\left(a,t\right) da}{\int_R^{\omega }{e}^{- na}l(a) da},\\ {}{y}_l(t)=\frac{\int_E^R{e}^{- na}l(a){y}_l\left(a,t\right) da}{\int_E^R{e}^{- na}l(a) da},\end{array}} $$

respectively, we have

$$ \frac{\partial d(t)}{\partial t}=\left(r-n\right)d(t)-t(t)+b(t)\frac{\int_R^{\omega }{e}^{- na}l(a) da}{\int_E^R{e}^{- na}l(a) da}-\tau (t)\ {y}_l(t). $$
(A.3)

Defining the old-age dependency ratio, α, as

$$ \alpha =\frac{\int_R^{\omega }{e}^{- na}l(a) da}{\int_E^R{e}^{- na}l(a) da}. $$
(A.4)

Substituting Eq. A.4 in Eq. A.3 gives

$$ \frac{\partial d(t)}{\partial t}=\left(r-n\right)d(t)-t(t)+b(t)\alpha (t)-\tau (t)\ {y}_l(t). $$
(A.5)

Finally, assuming the debt per worker remains unchanged, d(t) = d, we obtain Eq. 1

$$ \left(r-n\right)d+ b\alpha =\tau\ {y}_l+t. $$

Maximum Pension Benefit

First, we relate the average pension to the initial pension benefit. Assuming a mature pension system in which labor income increases at a rate g, then the pension benefit at age a can be expressed in terms of the initial pension benefit as b(a) = b(R)e g(a − R). Using the “mean value theorem for definitive integrals,” the average pension benefit can be expressed in terms of the pension benefit of new retirees as follows:

$$ b=\frac{\int_R^{\omega }{e}^{- na}l(a)b(a) da}{\int_R^{\omega }{e}^{- na}l(a) da}=b(R){\int}_R^{\omega }{e}^{-g\left(a-R\right)}\frac{e^{- na}l(a)}{\int_R^{\omega }{e}^{- nu}l(u) du\ }\ da=b(R){e}^{-g\left(\overline{A}-R\right)}, $$
(A.6)

where \( \overline{A} \) is the average age of pensioners. For notational simplicity, we define the difference \( \overline{A}-R \) as A R, or the average number of years lived as a pensioner.

Now, consider the pension benefit of new retirees cannot exceed the average disposable income, after financing the pension system, of current workers; that is,

$$ b(R)\le \left(1-\tau \right)\ {y}_l-t. $$
(A.7)

Multiplying both sides of Eq. 1 by minus one, adding in both sides of the equality the average labor income, and using Eq. A.7 give

$$ b(R)\le {y}_l-\left(r-n\right)d- b\alpha =\left(1-\tau \right){y}_l-t. $$
(A.8)

Using Eq. A.6 and dividing both sides of A.7 by the average labor income gives

$$ \frac{b(R)}{y_l}\le \frac{1}{1+{e}^{-g{A}_R}\alpha }-\frac{r-n}{1+{e}^{-g{A}_R}\alpha}\frac{d}{y_l}, $$
(A.9)

which coincides with Eq. 3.

Sustainability Factor

Assuming d = 0, a balanced pension system satisfies

$$ b\alpha =\tau\ {y}_l. $$
(A.10)

Substituting Eq. A.6 in Eq. A.10 gives

$$ b(R){e}^{-g{A}_R}\alpha =\tau\ {y}_l\Rightarrow \phi := \frac{b(R)}{y_l}=\frac{\tau }{\alpha }\ {e}^{g{A}_R}. $$
(A.11)

Taking logarithms in Eq. A.11 and differentiating it with respect to time gives

$$ \frac{1}{\phi}\frac{d\phi}{d t}=\frac{1}{\tau}\frac{d\tau}{d t}-\frac{1}{\alpha}\frac{d\alpha}{d t}+\frac{d\left(g{A}_R\right)}{d t}. $$
(A.12)

Sustainable Internal Rate of Return of a Pension System

Let us assume a stable population that grows at a rate n and an economy whose wages increase annually at a rate g. In a mature and balanced pension system, all contributions equal all benefits claimed:

$$ {\int}_E^R{e}^{- na}l(a)\tau {y}_l(a) da={\int}_R^{\omega }{e}^{- na}l(a)b(a) da. $$
(A.13)

Using the equality b(a) = b(R)e g(a − R) in Eq. A.13 gives

$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{ll}{\int}_E^R{e}^{- na}l(a)\tau {y}_l(a) da=& b(R)\\ {}& \times {e}^{gR}{\int}_R^{\omega }{e}^{-\left(n+g\right)a}l(a) da.\end{array}} $$
(A.14)

Let us denote i as the internal rate of return of the system. Thus, the present value, discounted at a rate i, of the stream of social contributions equals to the present value, discounted at rate i, of the stream of benefits received:

$$ {e}^{\left(i-g\right)R}{\int}_E^R{e}^{-\left(i-g\right)a}l(a)\tau {y}_l(a) da=b(R){e}^{iR}{\int}_R^{\omega }{e}^{- ia}l(a) da. $$
(A.15)

From Eq. A.15 the initial benefit at age R is

$$ b(R)=\tau {e}^{- gR}\frac{\int_E^R{e}^{-\left(i-g\right)a}l(a){y}_l(a) da}{\int_R^{\omega }{e}^{- ia}l(a) da}. $$
(A.16)

Substituting Eq. A.16 in Eq. A.14, and rearranging terms, it can be studied whether the benefits claimed exceed the contributions collected

$$ \frac{\int_R^{\omega }{e}^{-\left(n+g\right)a}l(a) da}{\int_R^{\omega }{e}^{- ia}l(a) da}{\int}_E^R{e}^{-\left(i-g\right)a}l(a)\tau {y}_l(a) da-{\int}_E^R{e}^{- na}l(a)\tau {y}_l(a) da\gtreqless 0. $$
(A.17)

Taking \( {\int}_E^R{e}^{- na}l(a)\tau {y}_l(a) da \) as common factor gives

$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}{\int}_E^R{e}^{- na}l(a)\tau {y}_l(a)\\ {}\begin{array}{l}\\ {}\times da\left(\frac{\int_R^{\omega }{e}^{-\left(n+g\right)a}l(a) da}{\int_R^{\omega }{e}^{- ia}l(a) da}\frac{\int_E^R{e}^{-\left(i-g\right)a}l(a){y}_l(a) da}{\int_E^R{e}^{- na}l(a){y}_l(a) da}-1\right)\end{array}\\ {}\times \gtreqless 0.\end{array}} $$
(A.18)

Notice the sign of Eq. A.18 depends on the sign of the term in parenthesis. After some manipulation of Eq. A.18, we have

$$ \left({\int}_R^{\omega }{e}^{-\left(n+g-i\right)a}\frac{e^{- ia}l(a)}{\int_R^{\omega }{e}^{- iu}l(u) du} da{\int}_E^R{e}^{-\left(i-g-n\right)a}\frac{e^{- na}l(a){y}_l(a)}{\int_E^R{e}^{- nu}l(u){y}_l(u) du} da-1\right), $$

which using the “mean value theorem for definitive integrals” gives

$$ \left({e}^{\left(i-n-g\right)\left({W}_R-{W}_L\right)}-1\right), $$
(A.19)

where W R and W L are the average age of pensioners and the average age of workers, respectively. Provided W R > W L, the above equation implies that the pension system generates a deficit (>0) or surplus (<0) depending on the value of the internal rate of return of the pension system (i) as follows:

$$ \left\{\begin{array}{cc}>0& i>n+g,\\ {}=0& i=n+g,\\ {}<0& i<n+g.\end{array}\right. $$
(A.20)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Sánchez-Romero, ., Prskawetz, A. (2019). Social Security: Long-Term Financing and Reform. In: Gu, D., Dupre, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69892-2_535-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69892-2_535-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69892-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69892-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics