Definition
The term “social security: long-term financing and reform” is used to denote the analysis and study of policies oriented to guarantee the long-run sustainability of social security systems. Focusing on pension systems, the principle of the social security system is to guarantee benefits when retired that are financed by contributions during working ages. The sustainability of a social security system is guaranteed if benefits paid out are covered by contributions to the system. Alternatively, sustainability of a social security system may be less stringently defined by requiring that the debt per worker of the social security system remains constant over time. Based on future projections of liabilities and revenues of social security programs, different reform scenarios can be developed. Parametric reforms of social security systems are targeted toward changes in either benefits, or contributions, or retirement ages. Structural reforms of social security systems denote the...
References
Auerbach AJ, Lee R (2011) Welfare and generational equity in sustainable unfunded pension systems. J Public Econ 95(1):16–27
Blanchard O, Chouraqui JC, Hagemann RP, Sartor N (1990) The sustainability of fiscal policy: new answers to an old question. OECD Econ Stud 15:7–36
Borgmann CH (2005) Social security, demographics, and risk. Population Economics. Springer Science & Business Media. Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Börsch-Supan A (2006) What are NDC systems? What do they bring to reform strategies? Pension reform: Issues and prospects for non-financial defined contribution (NDC) schemes, 35–55
Boskin M, Shoven J (2009) Concept and measures of earnings replacement rates during retirement. In: Bodie Z, Shoven J, Wise D (eds) Pensions and retirement in the United States. NBER, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 113–141
Bovenberg L, Van der Linden A (1997) Pension policies and the aging society. OECD Obs 205:10–15
Calvo E, Haverstick K, Sass SA (2009) Gradual retirement, sense of control, and retirees’ happiness. Res Aging 31(1):112–135
Chetty R, Stepner M, Abraham S, Lin S, Scuderi B, Turner N, Bergeron A, Cutler D (2016) The association between income and life expectancy in the United States, 2001–2014. J Am Med Assoc 315(14):1750–1766
Conde-Ruiz JI, González CI (2016) From Bismarck to Beveridge: the other pension reform in Spain. SERIEs 7(4):461–490
Dudel C, Ott N, Werding M (2016) Maintaining one’s living standard at old age: what does that mean? Empir Econ 51(3):1261–1279
Fehr H (2016) CGE modeling social security reforms. J Policy Model 38(3):475–494
Fehr H, Habermann C, Kindermann F (2008) Social security with rational and hyperbolic consumers. Rev Econ Dyn 11:884–903
Feldstein M (1974) Social security, induced retirement, and aggregate capital accumulation. J Polit Econ 82(5):905–926
Fenge R (1995) Pareto-efficiency of the pay-as-you-go pension system with intragenerational fairness. FinanzArchiv 52:357–363
Gruber J, Wise DA (1999) Social security and retirement around the world. University Chicago Press, Chicago
Holzmann R, Palmer E (2006) Pension reform: issues and prospects for non-financial defined contribution (NDC) schemes. World Bank, Washington, DC
Holzmann R, Hinz P R, Mark D (2008) Pension systems and reform conceptual framework. Social Protection and Labor Policy and Technical Notes 46175, The World Bank
Holzmann R, Palmer E, Robalino D (2012) Nonfinancial defined contribution pension schemes in a changing pension world: volume 1. Progress, lessons, and implementation. World Bank, Washington, DC
Holzmann R, Palmer E, Robalino D (2013) Nonfinancial defined contribution pension schemes in a changing pension world: volume 2. Gender, politics, and financial stability. World Bank, Washington, DC
Holzmann R, Palmer E, Palacios R, Sacchi S (2019) Progress and challenges of nonfinancial defined pension schemes: volume 1. Addressing marginalization, polarization, and the labor market. World Bank, Washington, DC
Hurd M, Michaud PC, Rohwedder S (2012) The displacement effect of public pensions on the accumulation of financial assets. Fisc Stud 33(1):107–128
Knell M (2017) Actuarial deductions for early retirement. Working Paper series of the Oesterreichische Nationalbank, WP 215
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2015) The growing gap in life expectancy by income: implications for federal programs and policy responses. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Nishiyama S, Smetters KA (2007) Does social security privatization produce efficiency gains? Q J Econ 122(4):1677–1719
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2017) Preventing ageing unequally. OECD Publishing, Paris
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2019) Gross pension replacement rates (indicator). https://doi.org/10.1787/3d1afeb1-en. Accessed 15 Feb 2019
Pestieau P, Ponthiere G (2016) Longevity variations and the welfare state. J Demogr Econ 82(2):207–239
Samuelson PA (1958) An exact consumption-loan model of interest with or without the social contrivance of money. J Polit Econ 66(6):467–482
Sanchez-Romero M, Prskawetz A (2017) Redistributive effects of the US pension system among individuals with different life expectancy. J Econ Ageing 10:51–74
Sánchez-Romero M, Sambt J, Prskawetz A (2013) Quantifying the role of alternative pension reforms on the Austrian economy. Labour Econ 22:94–114
Sánchez-Romero M, Lee R, Prskawetz A (2019) Redistributive effects of different pension structures when longevity varies by socioeconomic status. NBER Working Papers 25944. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
Scholz J, Seshadri A, Khitatrakun S (2006) Are Americans saving ‘optimally’ for retirement? J Polit Econ 114:607–643
Settergren O, Mikula BD (2005) The rate of return of pay-as-you-go pension systems: a more exact consumption-loan model of interest. J Pension Econ Finance 4(2):115–138
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2017) World population prospects: the 2017 revision, DVD Edition. Internet: https://population.un.org/wpp/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Appendix
Appendix
Basic Sustainability Equation
The following equation represents the basic equation for the evolution of debt/fund of the pension system at time t:
where D(t) is the total debt at time t, r is the interest rate, T(t) denotes the total taxes levied to finance the pension system, N(0, t) denotes the babies born at time t, R is the age at retirement, ω is the maximum lifespan (See “Maximum Lifespan”), n is the population growth rate, l(a) is the probability of surviving to age a, b(a, t) is the pension benefit at age a at time t, τ(t) is the social contribution rate, E is the length of schooling, and y l(a, t) is the labor income at age a at time t.
By expressing Eq. A.1 in terms of the debt per potential worker at time t – i.e., \( d(t)=\frac{D(t)}{L(t)} \), where L(t) is the total potential working age population – the social security budget constraint becomes:
Defining the average pension benefit at time t, b(t), and the average labor income at time t, y l (t), as
respectively, we have
Defining the old-age dependency ratio, α, as
Substituting Eq. A.4 in Eq. A.3 gives
Finally, assuming the debt per worker remains unchanged, d(t) = d, we obtain Eq. 1
Maximum Pension Benefit
First, we relate the average pension to the initial pension benefit. Assuming a mature pension system in which labor income increases at a rate g, then the pension benefit at age a can be expressed in terms of the initial pension benefit as b(a) = b(R)e −g(a − R). Using the “mean value theorem for definitive integrals,” the average pension benefit can be expressed in terms of the pension benefit of new retirees as follows:
where \( \overline{A} \) is the average age of pensioners. For notational simplicity, we define the difference \( \overline{A}-R \) as A R, or the average number of years lived as a pensioner.
Now, consider the pension benefit of new retirees cannot exceed the average disposable income, after financing the pension system, of current workers; that is,
Multiplying both sides of Eq. 1 by minus one, adding in both sides of the equality the average labor income, and using Eq. A.7 give
Using Eq. A.6 and dividing both sides of A.7 by the average labor income gives
which coincides with Eq. 3.
Sustainability Factor
Assuming d = 0, a balanced pension system satisfies
Substituting Eq. A.6 in Eq. A.10 gives
Taking logarithms in Eq. A.11 and differentiating it with respect to time gives
Sustainable Internal Rate of Return of a Pension System
Let us assume a stable population that grows at a rate n and an economy whose wages increase annually at a rate g. In a mature and balanced pension system, all contributions equal all benefits claimed:
Using the equality b(a) = b(R)e −g(a − R) in Eq. A.13 gives
Let us denote i as the internal rate of return of the system. Thus, the present value, discounted at a rate i, of the stream of social contributions equals to the present value, discounted at rate i, of the stream of benefits received:
From Eq. A.15 the initial benefit at age R is
Substituting Eq. A.16 in Eq. A.14, and rearranging terms, it can be studied whether the benefits claimed exceed the contributions collected
Taking \( {\int}_E^R{e}^{- na}l(a)\tau {y}_l(a) da \) as common factor gives
Notice the sign of Eq. A.18 depends on the sign of the term in parenthesis. After some manipulation of Eq. A.18, we have
which using the “mean value theorem for definitive integrals” gives
where W R and W L are the average age of pensioners and the average age of workers, respectively. Provided W R > W L, the above equation implies that the pension system generates a deficit (>0) or surplus (<0) depending on the value of the internal rate of return of the pension system (i) as follows:
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Sánchez-Romero, ., Prskawetz, A. (2019). Social Security: Long-Term Financing and Reform. In: Gu, D., Dupre, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69892-2_535-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69892-2_535-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69892-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69892-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences