Skip to main content

Ethics of Lifespan Extension

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging

Synonyms

Ethics of longevity; Moral debate over life extension

Definition

Debate around the appropriate moral principles that should govern the use and application of antiaging science where it may be used to radically extend Homo sapiens lifespan.

Introduction to the Debate

Radical life extension is an example of a human enhancement technology, one designed to grant a new, or augment an existing, capacity to Homo sapiens. Life extension is subject to fierce debate within certain sections of global bioethics (broadly conceived), and it is a topic that will likely never be agreed upon. A vast proportion of literature concerning human enhancement of any type is to some extent morally partisan, arguing from solidified pro- or anti-enhancement positions. Well-reasoned discourse in the field is not rare; however, while the debate broadly concentrates on the virtues of pursuing the technologies, it is likely to remain at an academic stalemate. Those in favor promote the potentialities with...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agar N (2014) The moral case against radical life extension. In Truly human enhancement: a philosophical defence of limits by Nicholas Agar.: MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon F (1627) New Atlantis; reproduced in: Bacon, F (2008). Vickers, Brian (ed.). The Major Works. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry R (2010) A polemic for human enhancement. Metascience 19(2):263–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-010-9361-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom N (2005a) A history of transhumanist thought. J Evol Technol 14(1):1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom N (2005b) Recent developments in the ethics science and politics of life-extension. Ageing Horiz 3:28–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Breasted JH (1991) The Edwin smith surgical papyrus: published in facsimile and hieroglyphic transliteration with translation and commentary in two volumes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan A (2004). An unnatural process: why it is not inherently wrong to seek a cure for aging) In: Post S, Binstock R (eds) The fountain of youth: cultural scientific and ethical perspectives on a biomedical goal 283. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels N (2000) Normal functioning and the treatment-enhancement distinction. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 9(3):309–322. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180100903037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Grey A, Rae M (2008) Ending aging: the rejuvenation breakthroughs that could reverse human aging in our lifetime. St. Martin’s Griffin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGrazia D (2005) Enhancement technologies and human identity. J Med Phil 30(3):261–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/03605310590960166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman JT (1979) Ageing: its history and literature. Human Sciences Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (2002) Our posthuman future: consequences of the biotechnology revolution. Farrar Straus & Giroux, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Glannon W (2002) Reply to Harris. Bioethics 16(3):292–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8519.00287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyngell C (2015) The ethics of human life extension: the second argument from evolution. J Med Phil 40(6):696–713. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhv027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris J (2002) Intimations of immortality – the ethics and justice of life expanding therapies. Curr Legal Probs 55(1):65–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/55.1.65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris J (2007) Enhancing evolution: the ethical case for making better people. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauskeller M (2013) Better humans?: understanding the enhancement project. Acumen, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayles K (1999) How we became posthuman: virtual bodies in cybernetics literature and informatics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Häyry M (2011) Considerable life extension and three views on the meaning of life. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 20(1):21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes J (2004) Citizen cyborg: why democratic societies must respond to the redesigned human of the future. Westview Press, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes J (2011) Transhumanism. In: Bainbridge W (ed) Leadership in science and technology: a reference handbook. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeungst E (2004) Anti-aging research and the limits of medicine. In Post S, Binstock R The fountain of youth: cultural scientific and ethical perspectives on a biomedical goal Oxford University Press, Oxford at 336

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan S (2012) Death. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Kass L (1985) Toward a more natural science: biology and human affairs. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kass L (2003) Chapter 9: L’Chaim and its limits: why not immortality? In: Kass L (ed) Life liberty and the defense of dignity: the challenge for bioethics. Encounter books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kass L (2017) Leading a worthy life: finding meaning in modern times. Encounter Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtzman J, Gordon P (1977) No more dying: the conquest of aging and the extension of human life. Dell, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin P, Allhoff F, Steinberg J (2011) Ethics of human enhancement: an executive summary. Sci Eng Ethics 17(2):201–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9191-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgely M (2002) Science as salvation. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill JS (1863) On liberty. Ticknor and Fields, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller R (2004) Extending life: scientific prospects and political obstacles. In: Post S, Binstock R (eds) The fountain of youth: cultural scientific and ethical perspectives on a biomedical goal. Oxford University Press, Oxford. At 243

    Google Scholar 

  • More M (2004) Superlongevity without overpopulation. In: Klein B (ed) The scientific conquest of death: essays on infinite lifespans. Immortality Institute, Buenos Aires. at 169

    Google Scholar 

  • Overall C (2003) Aging death and human longevity: a philosophical enquiry. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Rantanen R (2013) Issues in the debate on the ethics of considerable life extension. Res Cogn 1:34–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Intelligence Squared (2016) Debate: lifespans are long enough. February 3.. https://intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/lifespans-are-long-enough. Accessed April 9 2019

  • Stambler I (2017) Longevity promotion: multidisciplinary perspectives. Lulu Press, Rison Lezion

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland J (2006) The ideas interview: Nick Bostrom. The Guardian May 9. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2006/may/09/academicexperts.genetics. Accessed 9 Apr 2019

  • Williams B (1973) The Makropulos case: reflections on the tedium of immortality. In: Williams B (ed) Problems of the self: philosophical papers 1956–1972. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 82–100

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David R. Lawrence .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Lawrence, D.R. (2019). Ethics of Lifespan Extension. In: Gu, D., Dupre, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69892-2_392-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69892-2_392-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69892-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69892-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics