Abstract
Since the 1980s, research practices used to investigate children and childhoods have experienced a philosophical upheaval, with challenges to traditionally designed research, invoking epistemological and ontological shifts. Both epistemological and ontological shifts have brought to attention the complexity and plurality of children and childhoods and highlighted its epistemologically unstable structures. In this chapter, we follow this trend to problematize the thinking in childhoodnature inquiry that perceives methodology as a set of fixed, controllable, foreseeable, neutral, and a-theoretical practices, which ultimately repeats and reproduces ontological and epistemological sameness. In resisting this status quo, we draw on post-qualitative scholarship, inspired by post-human theories of difference and relationality, who maintain ontological worldviews and methodological practices as fluid, dynamic, and unstable, founded within dimensions of uncertainty. In calling for divergent methodological practices in childhoodnature inquiry, we make connections between the foundational theories of Piaget to the innovative and radical work of Gilles Deleuze, suggesting such frameworks provide a leaky, yet productive, architecture for a rethinking of methodological practices. The notion of leaky architecture enables a rethinking of binary language to invite movement and relationality: between subjects and objects, children and adults, and theories and methods. This chapter ends with a call for porous, fluid, and brut methodological practices as a way to adhere to movements of the unrefined and leaky nature of childhood as well as methodology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Annamma, S. (2016). Disrupting the carceral state through education journey mapping. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(9), 1210–1230.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bogue, R. (2007). Deleuze’s way: Essays in transverse ethics and aesthetics [Adobe Digital Editions version]. Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/auckland/detail.action?docID=438554
Bradley, G. F. (2016). Composing academic identities: Stories that matter? Qualitative Inquiry, 22(5), 377–385.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Brunial, K. (2016). The ambivalences of becoming a professor in neoliberal academia. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(5), 386–394.
Cuconato, M., & Walther, A. (2015). ‘Doing transitions’ in education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28(3), 283–296.
Dahlbeck, J. (2014a). On following commands: A philosophical inquiry into the governing values of Swedish early childhood education. Studies in Philosophy of Education, 33(5), 527–544.
Dahlbeck, J. (2014b). Towards a pure ontology: Children’s bodies and morality. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00775.x
Deleuze, G. (1990). The logic of sense (M. Lester & C. Stivale, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1969).
Deleuze, G. (1991). Bergsonism (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, Trans.). New York, NY: Zone Books.
Deleuze, G. (2006). What voice brings to the text. In D. Lapoujade (Ed.), Two regimes of madness: Texts and interviews 1975–1995 (A. Hodges & M. Taormina, Trans., pp. 325–326). New York, NY: Semiotext(e). (Original work published 2004).
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). London, England: Bloomsbury Academic. (Original work published 1980).
Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2007). Dialogues II (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, Trans.). London, England: Continuum. (Original work published 1977).
Duhn, I., Malone, K., & Tesar, M. (2017). Troubling the intersections of urban/nature/childhood in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 23(10), 1357–1369. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1392486
Higgins, M. (2016). Placing photovoice under erasure: A critical and complicit engagement with what it theoretically is (not). International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(5), 670–685.
Higgins, M., Madden, B., Berard, M. F., Lenz Kothe, E., & Nordstrom, S. (2017). De/signing research in education: Patchwork(ing) methodologies with theory. Educational Studies, 43(1), 16–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1237867
Hsiung, P. C. (2016). Teaching qualitative research as transgressive practices: Introduction to the special issue. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(2), 59–71.
Jackson, A., & Mazzei, L. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. London, England: Routledge.
Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2016). Reconceptualizing qualitative research: Methodologies without methodology. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
Koro-Ljungberg, M., Carlson, D., Tesar, M., & Anderson, K. (2015). Methodology brut: Philosophy, ecstatic, thinking, and some other (unfinished) things. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(7), 612–619.
Kuby, C. R., & Christ, R. C. (2017). Productive aporias and inten(t/s)ionalities of paradigming: Spacetimematterings in an introductory qualitative research course. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(4), 293–304.
Land, N., & Danis, I. (2016). Movement/in provocations in early childhood education. Journal of Childhood Studies, 41(3), 26–37.
Lather, P., & Smith, C. (1997). Troubling the angels: Women living with HIV/AIDS. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Lather, P., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 629–633.
Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London, England: Routledge.
Law, J. (2006, January 19). Making a mess with method. Retrieve from http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2006MakingaMesswithMethod.pdf
Lenz Taguchi, H. (2016). “The concept as method”: Tracing-and-mapping the problem of the neuro(n) in the field of education. Cultural Studies<—>Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 213–223.
Malcolm, Z. T., & Mendoza, P. (2014). Afro-Caribbean international students’ ethnic identity development: Fluidity, intersectionality, agency, and performativity. Journal of College Student Development, 55(6), 595–614.
Manning, E. (2013). Always more than one: Individuation’s dance. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the act: Passages in the ecology of experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt6wr79f
Martin, A. D., & Kamberelis, G. (2013). Mapping not tracing: Qualitative educational research with political teeth. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 668–679.
Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. London, England: Duke University Press.
McKechnie, L. E. F. (2008). Observational research. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 574–578). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
McLaren, P., & Pinkney-Pastrana, J. (2000). The search for the complicit native: Epistemic violence, historical amnesia, and the anthropologist as ideologue of empire. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(2), 163–184.
Myers, C. Y. (2015). Children, among other things: Entangled cartographies of the more-than-human kindergarten classroom (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University College, Ohio, OH).
Nakagawa, Y., & Payne, P. G. (2015). Critical place as a fluid margin in post-critical environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 21(2), 149–172.
Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education (G.-A. Roberts, Trans.). New York, NY: Grossman. (Original work published 1948 and 1972).
Piaget, J. (1981a). Afterthoughts. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini (Ed.), Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (pp. 278–284). London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Piaget, J. (1981b). The psychogenesis of knowledge and it’s epistemological significance. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini (Ed.), Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (pp. 23–34). London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Rautio, P., & Winston, J. (2015). Things and children in play: Improvisation with language and matter. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(1), 15–26.
Reinertsen, A. B. (2016). The a/un/grammatical child/hood/s and writing. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(3), 240–248.
Roy, K. (2003). Teachers in nomadic spaces: Deleuze and curriculum. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Schulte, C. M. (2016). Possible worlds: Deleuzian ontology and the project of listening in children’s drawing. Cultural Studies<—>Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 141–150.
Somers-Hall, S. (2013). Deleuze’s difference and repetition. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). The appearance of data. Cultural Studies<—>Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 223–227.
Swanger, J. (2002). Laboring in “borderless” world: The threat of globalization. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(1), 11–32.
Sweet, J. D., & Carlson, D. L. (2017). A story of becoming: Trans* equity as ethnodrama. Qualitative Inquiry, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417704467.
Walsh, A., & Tsilimpounidi, M. (2016). Dear tina: Protesting institutions in times of crisis. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(2), 137–148.
Wolgemuth, J. R. (2016). Driving the paradigm: (Failing to teach) methodological ambiguity, fluidity, and resistance in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(6), 518–525.
Wright, F. L. (1971). The language of an organic architecture. The Structurist, 0(11), 80–112.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Koro-Ljungberg, M., Tesar, M., Hargraves, V., Sandoval, J., Wells, T. (2020). Porous, Fluid, and Brut Methodologies in (Post)qualitative Childhoodnature Inquiry. In: Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, A., Malone, K., Barratt Hacking, E. (eds) Research Handbook on Childhoodnature . Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67286-1_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67286-1_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67285-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67286-1
eBook Packages: EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education