Skip to main content

Porous, Fluid, and Brut Methodologies in (Post)qualitative Childhoodnature Inquiry

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Research Handbook on Childhoodnature

Abstract

Since the 1980s, research practices used to investigate children and childhoods have experienced a philosophical upheaval, with challenges to traditionally designed research, invoking epistemological and ontological shifts. Both epistemological and ontological shifts have brought to attention the complexity and plurality of children and childhoods and highlighted its epistemologically unstable structures. In this chapter, we follow this trend to problematize the thinking in childhoodnature inquiry that perceives methodology as a set of fixed, controllable, foreseeable, neutral, and a-theoretical practices, which ultimately repeats and reproduces ontological and epistemological sameness. In resisting this status quo, we draw on post-qualitative scholarship, inspired by post-human theories of difference and relationality, who maintain ontological worldviews and methodological practices as fluid, dynamic, and unstable, founded within dimensions of uncertainty. In calling for divergent methodological practices in childhoodnature inquiry, we make connections between the foundational theories of Piaget to the innovative and radical work of Gilles Deleuze, suggesting such frameworks provide a leaky, yet productive, architecture for a rethinking of methodological practices. The notion of leaky architecture enables a rethinking of binary language to invite movement and relationality: between subjects and objects, children and adults, and theories and methods. This chapter ends with a call for porous, fluid, and brut methodological practices as a way to adhere to movements of the unrefined and leaky nature of childhood as well as methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Annamma, S. (2016). Disrupting the carceral state through education journey mapping. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(9), 1210–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogue, R. (2007). Deleuze’s way: Essays in transverse ethics and aesthetics [Adobe Digital Editions version]. Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/auckland/detail.action?docID=438554

  • Bradley, G. F. (2016). Composing academic identities: Stories that matter? Qualitative Inquiry, 22(5), 377–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunial, K. (2016). The ambivalences of becoming a professor in neoliberal academia. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(5), 386–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuconato, M., & Walther, A. (2015). ‘Doing transitions’ in education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28(3), 283–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlbeck, J. (2014a). On following commands: A philosophical inquiry into the governing values of Swedish early childhood education. Studies in Philosophy of Education, 33(5), 527–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlbeck, J. (2014b). Towards a pure ontology: Children’s bodies and morality. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00775.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1990). The logic of sense (M. Lester & C. Stivale, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1991). Bergsonism (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, Trans.). New York, NY: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (2006). What voice brings to the text. In D. Lapoujade (Ed.), Two regimes of madness: Texts and interviews 1975–1995 (A. Hodges & M. Taormina, Trans., pp. 325–326). New York, NY: Semiotext(e). (Original work published 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). London, England: Bloomsbury Academic. (Original work published 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2007). Dialogues II (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, Trans.). London, England: Continuum. (Original work published 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhn, I., Malone, K., & Tesar, M. (2017). Troubling the intersections of urban/nature/childhood in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 23(10), 1357–1369. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1392486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, M. (2016). Placing photovoice under erasure: A critical and complicit engagement with what it theoretically is (not). International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(5), 670–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, M., Madden, B., Berard, M. F., Lenz Kothe, E., & Nordstrom, S. (2017). De/signing research in education: Patchwork(ing) methodologies with theory. Educational Studies, 43(1), 16–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1237867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiung, P. C. (2016). Teaching qualitative research as transgressive practices: Introduction to the special issue. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(2), 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, A., & Mazzei, L. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2016). Reconceptualizing qualitative research: Methodologies without methodology. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koro-Ljungberg, M., Carlson, D., Tesar, M., & Anderson, K. (2015). Methodology brut: Philosophy, ecstatic, thinking, and some other (unfinished) things. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(7), 612–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuby, C. R., & Christ, R. C. (2017). Productive aporias and inten(t/s)ionalities of paradigming: Spacetimematterings in an introductory qualitative research course. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(4), 293–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, N., & Danis, I. (2016). Movement/in provocations in early childhood education. Journal of Childhood Studies, 41(3), 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P., & Smith, C. (1997). Troubling the angels: Women living with HIV/AIDS. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 629–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London, England: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2006, January 19). Making a mess with method. Retrieve from http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2006MakingaMesswithMethod.pdf

  • Lenz Taguchi, H. (2016). “The concept as method”: Tracing-and-mapping the problem of the neuro(n) in the field of education. Cultural Studies<—>Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 213–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, Z. T., & Mendoza, P. (2014). Afro-Caribbean international students’ ethnic identity development: Fluidity, intersectionality, agency, and performativity. Journal of College Student Development, 55(6), 595–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, E. (2013). Always more than one: Individuation’s dance. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the act: Passages in the ecology of experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt6wr79f

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. D., & Kamberelis, G. (2013). Mapping not tracing: Qualitative educational research with political teeth. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 668–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. London, England: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McKechnie, L. E. F. (2008). Observational research. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 574–578). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P., & Pinkney-Pastrana, J. (2000). The search for the complicit native: Epistemic violence, historical amnesia, and the anthropologist as ideologue of empire. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(2), 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, C. Y. (2015). Children, among other things: Entangled cartographies of the more-than-human kindergarten classroom (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University College, Ohio, OH).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa, Y., & Payne, P. G. (2015). Critical place as a fluid margin in post-critical environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 21(2), 149–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education (G.-A. Roberts, Trans.). New York, NY: Grossman. (Original work published 1948 and 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1981a). Afterthoughts. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini (Ed.), Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (pp. 278–284). London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1981b). The psychogenesis of knowledge and it’s epistemological significance. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini (Ed.), Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (pp. 23–34). London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rautio, P., & Winston, J. (2015). Things and children in play: Improvisation with language and matter. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(1), 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinertsen, A. B. (2016). The a/un/grammatical child/hood/s and writing. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(3), 240–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, K. (2003). Teachers in nomadic spaces: Deleuze and curriculum. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulte, C. M. (2016). Possible worlds: Deleuzian ontology and the project of listening in children’s drawing. Cultural Studies<—>Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 141–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somers-Hall, S. (2013). Deleuze’s difference and repetition. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). The appearance of data. Cultural Studies<—>Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 223–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanger, J. (2002). Laboring in “borderless” world: The threat of globalization. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(1), 11–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweet, J. D., & Carlson, D. L. (2017). A story of becoming: Trans* equity as ethnodrama. Qualitative Inquiry, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417704467.

  • Walsh, A., & Tsilimpounidi, M. (2016). Dear tina: Protesting institutions in times of crisis. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(2), 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolgemuth, J. R. (2016). Driving the paradigm: (Failing to teach) methodological ambiguity, fluidity, and resistance in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(6), 518–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, F. L. (1971). The language of an organic architecture. The Structurist, 0(11), 80–112.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mirka Koro-Ljungberg or Marek Tesar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Koro-Ljungberg, M., Tesar, M., Hargraves, V., Sandoval, J., Wells, T. (2020). Porous, Fluid, and Brut Methodologies in (Post)qualitative Childhoodnature Inquiry. In: Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, A., Malone, K., Barratt Hacking, E. (eds) Research Handbook on Childhoodnature . Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67286-1_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics