Skip to main content

Token Test

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

Description

The Token Test and its variants are used to assess auditory comprehension in persons with developmental and acquired disorders affecting language. The examinee provides a gestural response (pointing to or moving plastic tokens) in response to a verbal command (e.g., touch the small, white circle). In its most commonly used form, the Token Test includes 20 tokens that vary in color, size, and shape. The test is divided into sections according to the length of the command, syntactic complexity, and working-memory demand; the commands become more difficult within each section and across sections. For example, a command in an early section might be “Point to the circle” in an array containing only one circle, while in a later section a command might be, “After picking up the green rectangle, touch the small white circle,” in an array of 20 tokens containing multiple tokens of each dimension.

There are several variants of the original Token Test (DeRenzi and Vignolo 1962),...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References and Reading

  • Boller, F., & Vignolo, L. A. (1966). Latent sensory aphasia in hemisphere-damaged patients: An experimental study with the Token Test. Brain, 89, 815–830.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeRenzi, E. (1979). A shortened version of the Token Test. In F. J. Boller & M. Dennis (Eds.), Auditory comprehension: Clinical and experimental studies with the Token Test (pp. 33–44). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRenzi, E., & Ferrari, C. (1978). The Reporter’s Test: A sensitive test to detect expressive disturbances in aphasics. Cortex, 14(2), 279–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeRenzi, E., & Vignolo, L. (1962). The Token Test: A sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasics. Brain, 85, 665–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzen, M. (2000). Reliability and validity in neuropsychological assessment. New York: Springer, Chap. 15.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hula, W., Doyle, P. J., McNeil, M. R., & Mikolic, J. M. (2006). Rasch modeling of revised Token Test performance: Validity and sensitivity to change. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 49, 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivnik, R. J., Malec, J. F., Smith, J. E., Tangalos, E. G., & Petersen, R. C. (1996). Neuropsychological tests’ norms above age 55: COWAT, BNT, MAE token, WRAT-R reading, AMNART, STROOP, TMT, and JLO. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 10, 262–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzini, P. M., Fioravit, E., Poli, C., & Lombardi, B. (2015). Reliability of the 36-item versin of the Token Test in patients with poststroke aphasia. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 22(5), 374–376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGhee, R. L., Ehrler, D. J., & DiSimoni, F. (2007). TTFC-2: Token Test for children (2nd ed.). Austin: Pro Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, M. R., & Prescott, T. E. (1978). The Revised Token Test. Austin: Pro Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, M. R., Pratt, S. R., Szuminsky, N., Sung, J. E., Fossett, T. R., Fassbinder, W., & Lim, K. Y. (2015). Reliability and validity of the computerized Revised Token Test: Comparison of reading and listening versions in persons with and without aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 58(2), 311–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, G. H., McNeil, M. R., & Tompkins, C. A. (2000). Reliability of the five-item Revised Token Test for individuals with aphasia. Aphasiology, 14, 527–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, S., Eberwein, C., McNeil, M., Ortmann, A., Roxberg, J., Fossett, T., et al. (2006). The computerized Revised Token Test: Assessing the impact of age and sound intensity. Sheffield: International Aphasia Rehabilitation Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spellacy, F. J., & Spreen, O. (1969). A short form of the Token Test. Cortex, 5, 390–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreen, O., & Risser, A. H. (2003). Assessment of aphasia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Chap. 7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet P. Patterson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Patterson, J.P. (2018). Token Test. In: Kreutzer, J.S., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_931

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics