Skip to main content

The Comparator

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior

Definition

The theoretical concept of a “comparator” has been proposed in order to explain how the brain distinguishes sensory information that is expected based on our own voluntary behaviors versus that generated by events in the external world. Specifically, the comparator is thought to subtract the motor-based estimate of sensory inflow from actual sensory signal to suppress the representation of expected stimuli. This self-monitoring mechanism ensures accurate motor control and stable perception.

Overview

It is important to correctly detect our own actions in order to effectively interact with and build an accurate representation of our environment. However, our sensory systems are activated by both external events (sensory exafference) and our own actions (sensory reafference). The prevailing view is that the brain largely achieves control of posture and accurate perceptual representation of the environment during voluntary actions by suppressing self-generated sensory...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bell, C. C., Han, V., & Sawtell, N. B. (2008). Cerebellum-like structures and their implications for cerebellar function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, S. J., Wolpert, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (1998). Central cancellation of self produced tickle sensation. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 635–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J. X., & Cullen, K. E. (2014). Early vestibular processing does not discriminate active from passive self-motion if there is a discrepancy between predicted and actual proprioceptive feedback. Journal of Neurophysiology, 111(12), 2465–2478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J. X., Carriot, J., & Cullen, K. E. (2015). Learning to expect the unexpected: Rapid updating in primate cerebellum during voluntary self-motion. Nature Neuroscience, 18(9), 1310–1317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couchman, J. J. (2015). Humans and monkeys distinguish between self-generated, opposing, and random actions. Animal Cognition, 18(1), 231–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, K. E. (2011). The neural encoding of self-motion. Current opinion in neurobiology, 21(4), 587–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, P. (2017). Sense of agency in the human brain. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 18(4), 196–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, M. A., & Wurtz, R. H. (2008). Brain circuits for the internal monitoring of movements. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31, 317–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Holst, E., & Mittelstaedt, H. (1950). Das reafferenzprinzip. Naturwissenschaften, 37, 464–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, D. M., & Miall, R. C. (1996). Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Networks, 9(8), 1265–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen E. Cullen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Brooks, J.X., Cullen, K.E. (2019). The Comparator. In: Vonk, J., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_217-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_217-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics