Skip to main content

The University as Engine for Anticipation: Stewardship, Modelling, Experimentation, and Critique in Public

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Anticipation

Abstract

This chapter explores the historical orientation of universities to the future, arguing that Western research universities are characterized by four distinctive orientations to the future: stewardship (the preservation and care for knowledge, ways of being and diversity), experimentation and discovery (the use of experiment to produce new knowledge about and new realities within the world), modelling (the exploration of alternative potential future worlds through mathematical and imaginative means), and critique (the critical analysis of claims to the future, both internal and external). These orientations to the future have the potential to provide a powerful anticipatory resource for society. Historically, however, they have been allied to colonial and state-building projects, and today they risk capture by commercial interests. In the contemporary university, these future orientations are still present, distributed across disciplines. Three problems prevent their being harnessed as a powerful societal resource: the difficulties of building interdisciplinary collaborations within contemporary universities, the confusion over accountability and in whose service these resources should be used, and the tension over the forms of personhood that universities should be developing and for what ends. The chapter goes on to explore, through a study of over 300 collaborative projects, whether an emerging form of research practice – researching in public, through participatory and collaborative traditions – might offer a means of addressing these difficulties and opening up new opportunities for dialogue between the practices of stewardship, discovery, critique, and modelling within the university.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adam, B., & Groves, C. (2007). Future matters: Action, knowledge, ethics. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amsler, S., & Facer, K. (2017). Contesting anticipatory regimes in education: Exploring alternative educational orientations to the future. Futures, 94, 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.01.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2016). Understanding the University. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, A., & Born, G. (2013). Interdisciplinarity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (1989/2001). Academic tribes and territories. Buckingham: SRHE/OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogost, I. (2013). Alien phenomenology: Or what it’s like to be a thing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., Lauder, H., & Ashton, D. (2010). The global auction: The broken promises of education, jobs and incomes. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Cambridge: Allan & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Sousa Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the South. Justice against Epistemicide. Boulder/London: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2009). Relational Agency in Collaborations for the wellbeing of children and young people. Journal of Children’s Services, 4(1), 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2017). Relational expertise: A cultural historical approach to teacher education. In M. Peters et al. (Eds.), A companion to research in teacher education. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facer, K. (2016). Using the future in education: Creating space for openness, optimism and novelty. In H. Lees & N. Noddings (Eds.), Palgrave international handbook of alternative education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facer, K., & Enright, B. (2014). Creating living knowledge: Community-university relationships and the participatory turn in the production of knowledge. Bristol: AHRC/Connected Communities. https://connected-communities.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Creating-Living-Knowledge.Final_.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facer, K., & Pahl, K. (2017). Valuing interdisciplinary collaborative research: Beyond impact. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, J., & Vallance, P. (2013). The University and the City. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komljenovic, J. (2017). Market ordering as a device for market-making: The case of the emerging students’ recruitment industry. Globalisation, Societies and Education., 15(3), 367–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassiter, E. (2004). The other side of Middletown: Exploring Muncie’s African-American Community. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979/1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, L. (2014). Academic resistance in the UK: Challenging quality assurance processes in higher education. Policy and Society, 33(3), 215–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2013). In defence of the school: A public issue. Leuven: Education, Culture and Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadin, M. (2016). Anticipation across disciplines. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Newfield, C. (2003). Ivy & Industry: Business and the making of the American University 1880–1980. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R. (2017). Introduction to anticipation studies. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, F. (2001). The creation of the future: The role of the American University (p. 244). New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, I. (2016). In S. Eriksen (Ed.), The making of intellectual culture in Medieval Scandinavia, ca. 1150–1350 (pp. 77–101). Turnhout: Brepols Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellmon, C. (2015). Organising enlightenment: Information overload and the invention of the modern research university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. F. (1938). Modes of thought (p. 233). New York: Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. (2015). Redbrick: A social and architectural history of Britain’s civic universities. Oxford: OUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wittrock, B. (2010). The modern University: The three transformations. In S. Rothblatt & B. Wittrock (Eds.), The European and American University since (p. 1800). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (2017). Can the University be a livable institution in the Anthropocene? In R. Deem & H. Eggins (Eds.), The University as a critical institution (pp. 17–37). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M., & Muller, J. (2013). On the powers of powerful knowledge. Review of Education, 1(3), 229–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keri Facer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Facer, K. (2018). The University as Engine for Anticipation: Stewardship, Modelling, Experimentation, and Critique in Public. In: Poli, R. (eds) Handbook of Anticipation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_29-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_29-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31737-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31737-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics