Abstract
Aging is a complex process that involves intrinsic and extrinsic factors and result in modifications in all tissues of the body. The aging of the face comprise a set of changes in bone support along with atrophy and flexibility of soft tissues such as skin, muscles, fat, and ligaments. Anatomically, the face can be divided in two regions: anterior and lateral. In the anterior part, there is predominance of the structures related to facial expression, while in the lateral region muscles related to mastication stand out. Another way to divide the facial components is related to general stratification in five basic layers joined by a system of facial retention ligaments. To promote the mobility required for facial expression independent of the basic functions of the face, particularly chewing, a number of soft tissue spaces are incorporated into the face architecture. This arrangement, most clearly seen on the scalp, also exists on the rest of the face, although with significant modifications. Understanding the anatomy of the aging process, in other words, the impact of facial skeletal aging and its correlations with soft tissue changes, will lead to an understanding of the current perspective of a three-dimensional approach to injectable procedures that are much more effective in preventing and treating the signs of aging.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Brandt MG, Hassa A, Roth K, et al. Biomechanical properties of the facial retaining ligaments. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2012;14:289–94.
Chao YYY, Chhabra C, Corduff N, et al. Pan-Asian consensus – Key recommendations for adapting the world congress of dermatology consensus on combination treatment with injectable fillers, toxins, and ultrasound devices in Asian patients. J Clin Aesthet Derm. 2017;10(8):16–27.
Cotofana S, et al. Midface: clinical anatomy and regional approaches with injectable fillers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:219S.
Cotofana S, Fratila AA, Schenck TL, Redka-Swoboda W, Zilinsky I, Pavicic T. The anatomy of the aging face: a review. Facial Plast Surg. 2016;32(03):253–60.
Farkas JP, Pessa JE, Hubbard B, Rohrich RJ. The science and theory behind facial aging. Plast Reconstr Surg Global Open. 2013;1(1):8–15.
Furnas DW. The retaining ligaments of the cheek. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;83:11.
Ghassemi A, Prescher A, Riediger D, Axer H. Anatomy of the SMAS revisited. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2003;27(4):258–64.
Gierloff M, Stöhring C, Buder T, et al. Aging changes of the midfacial fat compartments: a computed tomographic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012a;129:263–73.
Gierloff M, Stöhring C, Buder T, Wiltfang J. The subcutaneous fat compartments in relation to aesthetically important facial folds and rhytides. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012b;65(10):1292–7.
Gladstone GJ, Myint S, Black EH, Brazzo BG, Nesi FA. Fundamentals of facelift surgery. Ophthalmol Clin N Am. 2005;18(2):311–7. vii
Gosain AK, Klein MH, Sudhakar PV, et al. A volumetric analysis of soft-tissue changes in the aging midface using high-resolution MRI: implications for facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:1143–52. discussion 1153–1155
Hellman M. Changes in the human face brought about by development. Int J Orthod. 1927;13:475.
Ilankovan V. Anatomy of ageing face. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;52:195–202.
Jacono A, Rousso J. An algorithmic approach to multimodality midfacial rejuvenation using a new classification system for midfacial aging. Clin Plast Surg. 2015;42:17–32.
Kim SJ, Kim SJ, Park JS, Byun SW, Bae JH. Analysis of age-related changes in Asian facial skeletons using 3D vector mathematics on picture archiving and communication system computed tomography. Yonsei Med J. 2015;56:1395–400.
Lambros V. Observations on periorbital and midface aging. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(5):1367–76.
Lee S, Yen MT. Nonsurgical rejuvenation of the eyelids with hyaluronic acid gel injections. Semin Plast Surg. 2017;31(1):17–21.
Liew S. Ethnic and gender considerations in the use of facial injectables: Asian patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:22S.
Mendelson BC. Advances in the understanding of the surgical anatomy of the face. In: Eisenmann-Klein M, Neuhann-Lorenz C, editors. Innovations in plastic and aesthetic surgery. Chapter 18. New York: Springer; 2007. p. 141–5.
Mendelson BC, Jacobson SR. Surgical anatomy of the midcheek: facial layers, spaces, and the midcheek segments. Clin Plast Surg. 2008;35:395–404.
Mendelson BC, Facelift anatomy, SMAS, retaining ligaments and facial spaces. In: Aston J, Steinbrech DS, Walden JL, eds. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. London: Saunders Elsevier; 2009:53–72.
Mendelson B, Wong CH. Changes in the facial skeleton with aging: implications and clinical applications in facial rejuvenation. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2012a;36(4):753–76.
Mendelson BC, Wong CH. Chapter 6: anatomy of the aging face. In: Neligan PC, Warren RJ, editors. Plastic surgery. 3rd ed, vol 2: Aesthetic. New York: Elsevier; 2012b p. 78–92.
Mendelson BC, Freeman ME, Wu W, Huggins RJ. Surgical anatomy of the lower face: the premasseter space, the jowl, and the labiomandibular fold. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2008;32(2):185–95.
Mitz V, Peyronie M. The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;58:80–8.
Moss CJ, Mendelson BC, Taylor GI. Surgical anatomy of the ligamentous attachments in the temple and periorbital regions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(4):1475–90.
Muzaffar AR, Mendelson BC, Adams WP Jr. Surgical anatomy of the ligamentous attachments of the lower lid and lateral canthus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(3):873–84.
Owsley JQ. Lifting the malar fat pad for correction of prominent nasolabial folds. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;91(3):463–74.
Pessa JE, Zadoo VP, Adrian EK Jr, Yuan CH, Aydelotte J, Garza JR. Variability of the midfacial muscles: analysis of 50 hemifacial cadaver dissections. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998a;102(6):1888–93.
Pessa JE, Zadoo VP, Adrian EK, et al. Anatomy of a “black eye”: a newly described fascial system of the lower eyelid. Clin Anat. 1998b;11:157–61.
Pilsl U, Anderhuber F, Rzany B. Anatomy of the cheek: implications for soft tissue augmentation. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(7Pt2):1254–62.
Richard MJ, Morris C, Deen BF, Gray L, Woodward JA. Analysis of the anatomic changes of the aging facial skeleton using computer-assisted tomography. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;25(5):382–6.
Rohrich J, Pessa JE. The fat compartments of the face: anatomy and clinical implications for cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(7):2219–27.
Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The retaining system of the face: histologic evaluation of the septal boundaries of the subcutaneous fat compartments. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(5):1804–9.
Sadick NS. Volumetric structural rejuvenation for the male face. Dermatol Clin. 2018;36(1):43–8.
Shaw RB Jr, Katzel EB, Koltz PF, et al. Aging of the facial skeleton: aesthetic implications and rejuvenation strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(1):374–83.
Stuzin JM, Baker TJ, Gordon HL. The relationship of the superficial and deep facial fascias: relevance to rhytidectomy and aging. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89(3):441–9.
Sundaram H, Liew S, Signorini M, Vieira Braz A, Fagien S, Swift A, De Boulle KL, Raspaldo H, Trindade de Almeida AR, Monheit G. Global aesthetics consensus: hyaluronic acid fillers and botulinum toxin type A – recommendations for combined treatment and optimizing outcomes in diverse patient populations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(5):1410–23.
Swaddle JP, Cuthill IC. Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: symmetry may not always be beautiful. Proc Biol Sci. 1995;261:111–6.
Swift A, Remington K. BeautiPHIcation™: a global approach to facial beauty. Clin Plast Surg. 2011;38(3):347–77.
Sykes JM, Cotofana S, Trevidic P, et al. Upper face: clinical anatomy and regional approaches with injectable fillers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(5, Suppl):204S–18S.
Thomaidis VK. Cutaneous flaps in head and neck reconstruction: from anatomy to surgery. Berlin: Springer; 2014.
Thornton GM, Lemmex DB, Ono Y, et al. Aging affects mechanical properties and lubricin/PRG4 gene expression in normal ligaments. J Biomech. 2015;48(12):3306–11.
Wan D, Amirlak B, Rohrich R, Davis K. The clinical importance of the fat compartments in midfacial aging. Plast Reconstr Surg Global Open. 2013;1(9):e92.
Wan D, Amirlak B, Giessler P, et al. The differing adipocyte morphologies of deep versus superficial midfacial fat compartments: a cadaveric study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(5):615e–22e.
Weinkle S, Susan SM. Approach to the mature cosmetic patient: aging gracefully. J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16(6 Suppl):s84–6.
Wollina UJ. Facial rejuvenation starts in the midface: three-dimensional volumetric facial rejuvenation has beneficial effects on nontreated neighboring esthetic units. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016;15(1):82–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Palermo, E.C., Anzai, A., Jacomo, A.L. (2019). Three-Dimensional Approach of Cosmetic Patient: Aging Gracefully. In: Issa, M., Tamura, B. (eds) Botulinum Toxins, Fillers and Related Substances. Clinical Approaches and Procedures in Cosmetic Dermatology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20253-2_40-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20253-2_40-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20253-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20253-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Three-Dimensional Approach of Cosmetic Patient: Aging Gracefully- Published:
- 02 January 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20253-2_40-2
-
Original
Three-Dimensional Approach of Cosmetic Patient: Aging Gracefully- Published:
- 21 March 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20253-2_40-1