Skip to main content

Time in Renaissance Philosophy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 151 Accesses

Abstract

As a central dimension of the Human experience, the conception of time has undergone deep transformations during the Renaissance period, in relationship with global evolutions in European arts, sciences, and metaphysics. The Aristotelian definition of time as “a number of motion in respect to before and after” was challenged to open the way to an ontological determination of time, independent from motion and connected to the divine structure of beings in the universe. From Ficino to most innovative thinkers like Telesio, Patrizi. Bruno in particular introduced a relativistic perspective and showed that we should rather speak of a multiplicity of times. The reflection on the difference between time and duration has been another technical issue developed by Renaissance thinkers: since time was no more referred to the Ptolemaic cosmos, the concept of duration was used to designate the internal time of things and existing beings, as Suarez makes clear at the beginning of seventeenth century. This idea of time as an inner reality also had important applications in the field of literature and moral philosophy, as we see for instance in Shakespeare and Montaigne. Although Modern Philosophers like Descartes or Pascal seem to break with the scholastic approach of time, it is interesting to note that the pre-Newtonian concept of “absolute time” is rooted in Renaissance theories of time and the development of Copernicanism leading to the construction of a new reference frame, where the Suarezian “imaginary time” plays a central role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

Secondary Literature

  • Ariotti, Piero. 1973. Toward absolute time: The undermining and refutation of the Aristotelian concept of time in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Annals of Science 30: 31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bexley, Emmaline. 2011. Quasi-absolute time in Francisco Suárez’s metaphysical disputations. Intellectual History Review 22 (1): 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, Paul Richard. 2007. The immortality of the soul. In The Cambridge companion to renaissance philosophy, ed. James Hankins, 211–233. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenberg, Hans. 1973. Die Kopernikanische Konsequenz für den Zeitbegriff. In The reception of Copernicus’ Heliocentric theory, ed. Jerzy Dobrzycki, 57–77. Dordrecht/Boston: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, Mario Santiago de. 2001. The concept of time according to the Coimbra commentaries. In The medieval concept of time: Studies on the scholastic debate and its reception in early modern philosophy, ed. Pasquale Porro, 353–382. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, Ernst. 1927. Individuum und Kosmos in der Philosophie der Renaissance. Dordrecht/Leipzig: Teubner.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, Stephen H. 1981. Seventeenth-century scolastic treatments of time. Journal of the History of Ideas 42 (4): 587–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debus, Allen G. 1977. The chemical philosophy. Paracelsia science and medicine in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Mineola: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubouclez, Olivier. 2015. On the time of the intellect: The interpretation of De Anima 3.6 (430b 7–20) in renaissance and early modern Italian philosophy. Early Science and Medicine 20: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Michael. 2013. Time and the science of the soul in early modern philosophy. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, John Spencer. 1997. Infinity, faith and time. Christian humanism and renaissance literature. Montreal/Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, Sarah. 1977. Some renaissance critiques of Aristotle’s theory of time. Annals of Science 34 (4): 345–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumann, Karl. 2004. Zur Entstehung des neuzeitlichen Zeitbegriffs: Telesio, Patrizi, Gassendi. Philosophia Naturalis 25: 37–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porro, Pasquale. 1996. Forme e modelli di durata nel pensiero medievale: l'aevum, il tempo discreto, la categoria “quando”. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prins, Jacomien. 2014. Echoes of an invisible world. Marsilio Ficino and Francesco Patrizi on cosmic order and music theory. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Charles B. 1967. Gianfrancesco Pico della Mirandola (1469–1533) and his critique of Aristotle. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seidengart. 2015. Dieu, l’univers et la science infinite. Penser l’infinité cosmique à l’aube de la science classique. Paris: Albin Michel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solère, Jean-Luc. 1997. Descartes et les discussions médiévales sur le temps. In Descartes et le Moyen Age, ed. Joël Biard and Roshdi Rashed. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, Carlos. 2001. The neoplatonic doctrine of time and eternity and its influence on medieval philosophy. In The medieval concept of time: Studies on the scholastic debate and its reception in early modern philosophy, ed. Pasquale Porro, 3–31. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, Rebecca Lloyd. 2014. Descartes’ temporal dualism. London: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Dubouclez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Dubouclez, O. (2019). Time in Renaissance Philosophy. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_980-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_980-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics