Skip to main content

“Deep” or “Strong” Sustainability

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

Synonyms

Critical natural capital; Natural capital stock; Substitutability

Introduction

Sustainable development has been described as “development that meets the needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own demands” (WCED 1987). This conceptualization as presented in the report Our Common Future (ibid.), has been widely used as a standard definition (Barr 2008). It is the result of efforts to integrate social, economic, and environmental considerations into a new concept of development as a response to ideas of progress and growth which gained popularity in the 1970s. (See Du Pisani (2006) for a historical overview of the concept.) Under this rationale, sustainable development should allow for poverty alleviation and inequality reduction while ensuring intra- and intergenerational equity. Accordingly, future generations should be entitled to the same level of social and economic opportunities as available for present...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Al-Saidi M, Dos Santos Buriti R (in press) Ecosystem infrastructure for sustainability. Revaluating nature through community-based water and land policies in Brazil. In: Heikkurinnen P, Bonnedahl K (eds.) Strong sustainable societies

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB (2003) The role of natural resources in economic development. Aust Econ Pap 42(2):253–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB, Burgess JC (2017) Natural resource economics, planetary boundaries and strong sustainability. Sustain For 9(10):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr S (2008) Environment and society: sustainability, policy and the citizen. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand F (2009) Critical natural capital revisited: Ecological resilience and sustainable development. Ecol Econ 68:605–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiesura A, De Groot R (2003) Critical natural capital: a socio-cultural perspective. Ecol Econ 44:219–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie M, Fazey I, Cooper R, Hyd T, Deri A, Hughes L, Bush G, Brander L, Nahman A, de Lange W, Reyers B (2008) An evaluation of economic and non-economic techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity to people in developing countries. Defra, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Conesa-Sevilla J (2006) The intrinsic value of the whole: cognitive and utilitarian evaluative processes as they pertain ecocentric, deep ecological, and ecopsychological “valuing”. Trumpeter 22(2):26–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, Daly HE (1992) Natural capital and sustainable development. Conserv Biol 6(1):37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly HE (1990) Toward some operational principles of sustainable development. Ecol Econ 2:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly HE (1992) From empty world to full world economics. In: Goodland R, Daly HE, El Serafy S (eds) Population, technology, and lifestyle: the transition to sustainability. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 23–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly HE (1995) On Wilfred Beckerman’s critique of sustainable development. Environ Values 4:49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta P, Heal G (1974) The optimal depletion of exhaustible resources. Rev Econ Stud 41:3–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot RS (1992) Functions of nature, evaluation of nature in environmental planning, management and decision making. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot RS, Van der Perk J, Chiesura A, van Vliet A (2003) Importance and threat as determining factors for criticality of natural capital. Ecol Econ 44:187–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex 7:260–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz S, Neumayer E (2007) Weak and strong sustainability in the SEEA: concepts and measurement. Ecol Econ 61(4):617–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Pisani JA (2006) Sustainable development: historical roots of the concept. Environ Sci 3(2):83–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekins P (2003) Identifying critical natural capital: conclusions about critical natural capital. Ecol Econ 44:277–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekins P, Simon S, Deutsch L, Folke C, De Groot R (2003) A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital an d strong sustainability. Ecol Econ 44:165–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekins P, Dresner S, Dahlström K (2008) The four-capital method of sustainable development evaluation. Eur Environ 18:63–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farber SC, Costanza R, Wilson MA (2002) Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 41:375–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farley J (2008) The role of pricing in conserving critical natural capital. Conserv Biol 22(6):1399–1408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher B, Turner KR, Morling P (2009) Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ 68(3):643–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster J (2002) Deep sustainability and the human future. The Trompeter 18(1). Available at http://trumpeter.athabascau.ca/index.php/trumpet/article/view/118/125

  • Hartwick JM (1977) Intergenerational equity and investing of rents from exhaustible resources. Am Econ Rev 67:972–974

    Google Scholar 

  • Hediger W (1999) Reconciling “weak” and “strong” sustainability. Int J Soc Econ 26(7/8/9):1120–1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikerd J, Gamble L, Cox T (2014) Deep sustainability; the essentials. Available at https://sites.google.com/site/sustainabilitydeep/

  • Kates RW, Parris TM, Leiserowitz AA (2005) What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values and practices. Environ: Sci Policy Sustain Dev 47(3):8–21

    Google Scholar 

  • MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human well being. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer E (2013) Weak versus strong sustainability: exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms, 4th edn. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce DW, Turner RK (1990) Economics of natural resources and the environment. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelenc J, Ballet J (2015) Strong sustainability, critical natural capital and the capability approach. Ecol Econ 112:36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pires M (2004) Watershed protection for a world city. The case of New York. Land Use Policy 21(2):161–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson A, Chapin AS, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Foke C, Schellnhuber HJ (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small N, Munday M, Durance I (2017) The challenge of valuing ecosystem services that have no material benefits. Glob Environ Chang 44:57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1974) Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. Rev Econ Stud 41:29–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TEEB (2010) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity ecological and economic foundations. Earthscan, London and Washington. Available at http://www.teebweb.org/our-publications/teeb-study-reports/ecological-and-economic-foundations/

  • Turner RK (1993) Sustainability: principles and practices. In: Turner RK (ed) Sustainable environmental economics and management: principles and practice. Belhaven Press, New York/London, pp 3–36

    Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (2016) What is green infrastructure? Available at https://www.epa.gov/green-infrastructure/policy-guides

  • WCED (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Available at http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunder S (2005) Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. CIFOR occasional paper 42. Available at https://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/OccPapers/OP-42.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renata Buriti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Buriti, R. (2019). “Deep” or “Strong” Sustainability. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11352-0_503

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics