Skip to main content

Construction of the Concept of Religion in the United Nations’ General Assembly: From Human Rights to Dialogue and Harmony

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of the Changing World Language Map

Abstract

Over the last two decades, we have been witnessing a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between what is described as religious and secular. All over the world, the seemingly clear-cut division between the religious and the secular has been put under scrutiny – in part with terribly violent outcomes.

The present chapter intends to add to the understanding of these processes by analyzing the development of the religion discourse in the context of the United Nations Organization (UN). First, the chapter makes the point that the UN – with its manifold suborganizations, commissions, and committees – has developed into one of the most significant stages for the display of worldwide discourses. Second, it argues that the reference to religion has changed considerably – from an object of human rights to a means for the creation of “peace and harmony.”

Along those lines, the chapter will use Reiner Keller’s concept of discourse analysis to look at the usage of the concept of religion in the official documents of the UN’s General Assembly, thus adding a frequently neglected “shade” of the more recent shifts in the world language map.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahsan, A. (1988). The organization of the Islamic conference: An introduction to an Islamic political institution. Herndon: Islamization of Knowledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnaut, K., Blommaert, J., Rampton, B., & Spotti, M. (Eds.). (2016). Language and superdiversity. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann-Medick, D. (Ed.). (2006). Cultural turns – Neuorientierungen in den Kulturwissenschaften. Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basset, J.-C. (1996). Le dialogue interreligieux − Histoire et avenir. Paris: Les Editions du CERF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behloul, S. M. (2009). Die Ordnung der Religion – Religionsgeschichte und Religionsgegenwart in diskurs-analytischer Perspektive. Habilitation, Universität Luzern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, R. N. (2007). Can we imagine a global civil religion? McDonald Lecture, Center for the Study of Law and Religion, on October 26, 2007. Available at http://cslr.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/media/PDFs/Lectures/Bellah.Alonzo_McDonald_Lecture.Can_We_Imagine_a_Global_Civil_Religion.pdf

  • Bielefeldt, H., Ghanea, G., & Wiener, M. (2016). Freedom of religion or belief – An international law commentary. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization, Cambridge approaches to language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bochinger, C., & Frank, K. (2013). Das religionswissenschaftliche Dreieck. Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft, 23, 343–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. (1961). The rhetoric of religion – Studies in logology. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cornille, C. (Ed.). (2013). The Wiley-Blackwell companion to inter-religious dialogue. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2007). Language and globalization. Abingdon: Routledge Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Favret-Saada, J. (2010). Jeux d’ombres sur la scѐne de l’ONU – Droit humains et laicité. Paris: Editions de l’Olivier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, T. (2007). Discourse on civility and barbarity – a critical history of religion and related categories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freiberger, O. (2016). Modes of comparison, towards creating a methodological framework for comparative studies. In P. Schmidt-Leukel & A. Nehring (Eds.), Interreligious comparisons in religious studies and theology – comparison revisited (pp. 53–71). London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, C. W.-h., & Spiegler, G. E. (Eds.). (1989). Religious issues and interreligious dialogue – An analysis and sourcebook of developments since 1945. New York: Greenwood Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, J. (2014). Faith-based organizations at the United Nations, Studies in religion, politics, and policy. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, J., & Henning, A. (2011). Introduction. In J. Haynes & A. Henning (Eds.), Religious actors in the public sphere – Means, objectives and effects, Studies in religion and politics (pp. 1–13). Milton Park: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjelm, T. (2012). Discourse analysis. In M. Stausberg & S. Engler (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of research methods in the study of religion (pp. 125–150). New York: Routledge Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kämpfert, M. (Ed.). (1986). Probleme der religiösen Sprache. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, R. (2011). The sociology of knowledge approach to discourse. Human Studies, 24, 43–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, P. (2007). The parliament of man – The past, present and future of the United Nations. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kille, K. J. (Ed.). (2007). The UN secretary general and moral authority – Ethics and religion in international leadership. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kippenberg, H. G., Lehmann, K., & Nagel, A.-K. (2013). Varieties of deprivatization – Revisiting religious communities in the public sphere. Journal of Religion in Europe, 6, 133–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knippenberg, H. G. (1983). Diskursive Religionswissenschaft – Gedanken zu einer Religionswissenschaft, die weder auf einer allgemein gültigen Definition von Religion noch auf einer Überlegenheit von Wissenschaft basiert. In B. Gladigow & H. G. Kippenberg (Eds.), Neue Ansätze in der Religionswissenschaft (pp. 9–28). München: Kösel Verlag (Forum Religionswissenschaft).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasno, J. E. (Ed.). (2004). United Nations – Confronting the challenges of a global society. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, K. (2010). Zur Etablierung von Religionen im Kontext der Vereinten Nationen – Ein Überblick. Religion – Staat – Gesellschaft, 11, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, K. (2015). Religious presence in the context of the United Nations Organization (UN) – a survey. In S. D. Brunn (Ed.), The changing world religion map – Sacred places, identities, practices and politics (pp. 2925–2940). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, K. (2016). Religious NGOs in international relations – The construction of “the religious” and “the secular”, Studies in religion and politics. London: Routledge Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, B. (2003). Holy terrors: Thinking about religion after September 11. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckmann, T. (1975). Sociology of language, Studies in sociology. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mar-Molinero, C., & Stevenson, P. (Eds.). (2006). Language ideologies, policies, and practices – Language and the future of Europe. Basingstoke/New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, K. (2013). Global institutions of religion – Ancient movers, modern shakers, Global institutions. New York: Routledge Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, K. (2005). NGOs and the United Nations – Institutionalization, professionalization and adaption. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutcheon, R. T. (1997). Manufacturing religion – The discourse on sui generis religion and politics of nostalgia (p. 1997). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, F. M. (1882). Introduction to the science of religion, four lectures delivered at the Royal Institute. London: Spottiswoode & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubert, F. (2016). Die diskursive Konstitution von Religion, Theorie und Praxis der Diskursforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Normand, R., & Zaidi, S. (2008). Human rights at the UN – The political history of universal justice, United Nations intellectual history project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurser, J. (2005). For all peoples and all nations – Christian churches and human rights, Advancing human rights. Geneva: WCC Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (1992). Introduction: Cases of “What is a case?”. In C. C. Ragin & H. S. Becker (Eds.), What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry (pp. 1–17). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrimpf, M. (2010). Self-cultivation and guidance to living in contemporary Japanese new religions – A discourse analytical approach. Habilitation, Universität Bayreuth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrode, P. (2010). Sunnitisch-islamische Diskurse zu Halal-Ernährung – Konstituierung religiöser Praxis und sozialer Positionierung unter Muslimen in Deustchland, Muslimische Welten. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toft, M. D., Philpott, D., & Shah, T. S. (2011). God’s century – Resurgent religion and global politics. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyrell, H., Krech, V., & Knoblauch, H. (1998). Religion als Kommunikation, Religion in der Gesellschaft. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Stuckrad, K. (2010). Reflections on the limits of reflection – an invitation to the discoursive study of religion. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 22, 156–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe, D. (1999). The politics of religious studies – The continuing conflict with theology in the academy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, M. (2007). Das Mandat des UN-Sonderberichterstatters über Religions- und Weltanschauungsfreiheit – Institutionelle, prozedurale und materielle Rechtsfragen, Schriften zum Staats- und Völkerrecht. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, L. (2012). Introduction. In L. Woodhead & R. Catto (Eds.), Religion and change in modern Britain (pp. 1–33). New York: Routledge Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

UN Source Materials

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karsten B. Lehmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Lehmann, K.B. (2020). Construction of the Concept of Religion in the United Nations’ General Assembly: From Human Rights to Dialogue and Harmony. In: Brunn, S., Kehrein, R. (eds) Handbook of the Changing World Language Map. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02438-3_56

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics