Skip to main content

Ethics and Digital Innovation in Finance

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook on Ethics in Finance

Part of the book series: International Handbooks in Business Ethics ((IHBE))

Abstract

Digital technologies are a powerful innovative and disruptive factor in finance. They have several dimensions, including an ethical dimension, that call upon the people and organizations that take part in financial activity to take into account the consequences of their actions on others, first of all, their users and customers, but also the stakeholders of the financial or technological organization in question, other organizations, sometimes in distant places, local communities and society in general, including when their decisions are supported, facilitated, or even replaced by programs and machines. This chapter explains the ethical dimension of digital technologies applied to finance and offers ideas for guiding the work of the agents who design or use these technologies so that they can contribute positively to the good of the people and society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrardi L, Cambini C, Rondi L (2019) The economics of artificial intelligence: a survey. EUI working paper RSCAS 2019/58. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Florence School of Regulation. https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/63684. Accessed 10 June 2019

  • Aldridge I (2019) High-frequency trading: a practical guide to algorithmic strategies and trading systems. Wiley, New York

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Anderson M, Anderson SL (2007) Machine ethics: creating an ethical intelligent agent. AI Mag 28(4):15

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • ArgandoƱa A (1995) The treatment of ethical problems in financial institutions and markets. In: ArgandoƱa A (ed) The ethical dimension of financial institutions and markets. Springer, Berlin, pp 1ā€“26

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • ArgandoƱa A (2018) Money and finance: ethical considerations. In: Heath E, Kaldis B, Marcoux A (eds) The Routledge companion to business ethics. Routledge, New York, pp 343ā€“358

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • ArgandoƱa A (2019a) Humility and decision-making in companies. In: Wright JC (ed) Humility. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 274ā€“297

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • ArgandoƱa A (2019b) Ethics and digital technologies in the home. Paper presented at the experts meeting ā€˜the home in the digital ageā€™, Home Renaissance Foundation, London, 25ā€“26 February 2019

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bank for International Settlements (2018a) Sound practices: implications of Fintech developments for banks and bank supervisors. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Basel

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bank for International Settlements (2018b) Central Bank digital currencies. Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures, Basel

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Barba Navaretti G, Calzolari G, Franco Pozzolo A (2017) FinTech and banks: friends or foes? Eur Econ 2:9ā€“30

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Barocas S, Selbst AD (2016) Big dataā€™s disparate impact. Calif Law Rev 104:671ā€“732

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bogroff A, GuĆ©gan D (2019) Artificial intelligence, data, ethics. An holistic approach for risks and regulations. Working paper. Department of Economics, Caā€™ Foscari University of Venice 19/WP/2019. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ven/wpaper/201919.h.ml. Accessed 10 June 2019

  • Boyd D, Crawford K (2012) Critical questions for big data. Inf Commun Soc 15(5):662ā€“679

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Brunnermeier MK, James J, Landau J-P (2019) The digitalization of money. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper 26300. https://www.nber.org/papers/w26300. Accessed 10 Oct 2019

  • Burr C, Taddeo M, Floridi L (2019) The ethics of digital well-being: a thematic review. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331231431_The_Ethics_of_Digital_Well-Being_A_Thematic_Rev.ew. Accessed 15 Mar 2019

  • Cavoukian A (2009) Privacy by design. The 7 foundationals principles. https://www.ipc.on.ca/wp-content/uploads/Resources/7foundationalprinciples..df. Accessed 15 Oct 2019

  • Clements R (2019) Regulating Fintech in Canada and the United States: comparison, challenges and opportunities. SPP research paper, vol 12, no 23. The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3304759. Accessed 20 June 2019

  • Competition Bureau of Canada (2017) Technology-led innovation in the Canadian financial services sector ā€“ a market study, December 2017. Competition Bureau of Canada, Ottawa

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Consumers International (2017) Banking on the future. An exploration on Fintech and the consumer interest. Consumers International, London

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Consumers International (2019) Artificial intelligence: consumer experiences in new technology. Consumers International, London

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • dā€™Acquisto G, Domingo-Ferrer J, Kikiras P, Torra V, de Montjoye Y-A, Bourka A (2015) Privacy by design in big data. An overview of privacy enhancing technologies in the era of big data analytics. European Union Agency for Network and Information Security. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/big-data-protect.on. Accessed 10 June 2019

  • Dā€™Acunto F, Prabhala N, Rossi A (2019) The promises and pitfalls of robo-advising. Rev Financ Stud 32(5):1983ā€“2020

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Daugherty PR, Wilson HJ (2018) Human + machine: reimagining work in the age of AI. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Diamond S, Drury N, Lipp A, Marshall A, Ramamurthy S, Wagle L (2019) Banking on the platform economy. IBM Institute for Business Values. https://www.ibm.com/downloads/cas/8RQVD.RN. Accessed 30 Sept 2019

  • Dierksmeier C, Seele P (2018) Cryptocurrencies and business ethics. J Bus Ethics 152(1):1ā€“14

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Ekbia H, Mattioli M, Kouper I, Arave G, Ghazinejad A, Bowman T, Suri VR, Tsou A, Weingart S, Sugimoto CR (2015) Big data, bigger dilemmas: a critical review. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 66(8):1523ā€“1545

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Etzioni A, Etzioni O (2016) AI assisted ethics. Ethics Inf Technol 18:149ā€“156

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Etzioni A, Etzioni O (2017) Incorporating ethics into artificial intelligence. J Ethics 21(4):403ā€“418

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Floridi L (1999) Information ethics: on the philosophical foundation of computer ethics. Ethics Inf Technol 1:37ā€“56

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Floridi L (2014) Smart, autonomous, and social: robots as challenge to human exceptionalism. Robophilosophy 11. http://ebooks.iospress.nl/volumearticle/38531. Accessed 25 June 2019

  • Floridi L, Sanders JW (2004) On the morality of artificial agents. Mind Mach 14:349ā€“379

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Floridi L, Taddeo M (2016) What is data ethics? Philos Trans R Soc A 374(2083):1ā€“5

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Foley S, Karlsen J, PutninÅ” T (2019) Sex, drugs and bitcoin: how much illegal activity is financed through cryptocurrencies. Rev Financ Stud 32(5):1798ā€“1853

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hacker P (2018) Teaching fairness to artificial intelligence: existing and novel strategies against algorithmic discrimination under EU law. Common Mark Law Rev 55:1143ā€“1186

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hagerty A, Rubinov I (2019) Global AI ethics: a review of the social impacts and ethical implications of artificial intelligence. arXiv:1907.07892v1. Accessed 10 Oct 2019

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hartman EM (2008) Socratic questions and Aristotelian answers: a virtue-based approach to business ethics. J Bus Ethics 78(3):313ā€“328

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hill RK (2015) What an algorithm is. Philos Technol 29(1):35ā€“59

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Iannarone NG (2018) Computer as confidant: digital investment advice and the fiduciary standard. Chicago-Kent Law Rev 93:141ā€“163

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kranzberg M (1986) Technology and history: Kranzbergā€™s laws. Technol Cult 27(3):544ā€“560

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • MacIntyre A (1984) After virtue: a study in moral theory, 2nd edn. Notre Dame University Press, Notre Dame

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Markham AN, Tiidenberg K, Herman A (2018) Ethics as methods: doing ethics in the era of big data research ā€“ introduction. Soc Media Soc 4(3):1ā€“9

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Mason RO (1986) Four ethical issues of the information age. MIS Quarterly 10(1):5

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Mittelstadt BD, Allo P, Taddeo M, Wachter S, Floridi L (2016) The ethics of algorithms: mapping the debate. Big Data Soc 3(2):1ā€“21

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Morley J, Floridi L, Kinsey L, Elhalal A (2019) From what to how: an overview of AI ethics tools, methods and research to translate principles into practices. https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.06876. Accessed 10 Oct 2019

  • Noto La Diega G (2018) Against the de-humanization of decision-making. Algorithmic decisions at the crossroads of intellectual property, data protection, and freedom of information. J Intellect Prop Inform Technol Electron Commer Law 9(1):3ā€“34

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Pham A, Castro C (2019) The moral limits of the market: the case of consumer scoring data. Ethics Inf Technol 21:117ā€“126

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Polo L (1995) Ɖtica. Hacia una versiĆ³n moderna de los temas clĆ”sicos. AEDOS ā€“ UniĆ³n Editorial, Madrid

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Poole D, Mackworth A, Goebel R (1998) Computational intelligence: a logical approach. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Roessler B (2005) The value of privacy. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Russell SJ, Norvig P (2009) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Selvadurai J (2013) Legal and ethical responsibilities in mobile payment privacy. Int J Sci Technol Res 2(6):68ā€“71

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Silberg J, Manyika J (2019) Tackling bias in artificial intelligence (and in humans). McKinsey Global Institute. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/artificial-intelligence/tackling-bias-in-artificial-intelligence-and-in-hum.ns. Accessed 10 Oct 2019

  • Sloan RH, Warner R (2019) Algorithms and human freedom. Santa Clara High Technol Law J 35(4):1ā€“34. https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1644&context=ch.lj. Accessed 20 Sept 2019

  • Tene O, Polonetsky J (2012) Privacy in the age of big data: a time for big decisions. Stanford Law Rev Online 64:63ā€“69. https://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/privacy-paradox-privacy-and-big-data/. Accessed 18 May 2019

  • Thakor AV (2019) Fintech and banking: what do we know? J Financ Intermed. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2019.100833. Accessed 25 Sept 2019

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Timmermans J, Ikonen V, Carsten Stahl B, Bozdag E (2010) The ethics of cloud computing. A conceptual review. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE international conference on cloud computing, technology and science, pp 614ā€“620. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221276542_The_Ethics_of_Cloud_Computing_A_Conceptual_Rev.ew. Accessed 2 May 2019

  • Tinn K (2019) Distributed ledger technologies and start-up financing. In: FatĆ”s A (ed) The economics of Fintech and digital currencies. Center for Economic Policy Research, London, pp 15ā€“20

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Turilli M (2007) Ethical protocols design. Ethics Inf Technol 9(1):49ā€“62

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Turilli M, Floridi L (2009) The ethics of information transparency. Ethics Inf Technol 11(2):105ā€“112

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • ValleĆ© T, Sedki K, Despres S, Jaulant M, Tabia T, Ugon A (2016) On personalization in IoT. In: 2016 international conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), vol 1, pp 186ā€“191. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7881335. Accessed 15 May 2019

  • van den Hoven J (2008) Information technology, privacy, and the protection of personal data. In: van den Hoven J, Weckert J (eds) Information technology and moral philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 301ā€“321

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Verbeek PP (2006) Materializing morality. Design ethics and technological mediation. Sci Technol Hum Values 31(3):361ā€“380

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Wing JM (2018) Data for good: FATES, elaborated. Data Science Institute, Columbia University. https://datascience.columbia.edu/FATES-Elabora.ed. Accessed 10 Apr 2019

  • Zamora J (2019) Managing artificial intelligence within a digital density framework. Working paper WP-1211-E, IESE Business School. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3477217. Accessed 10 Sept 2019

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio ArgandoƱa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

ArgandoƱa, A. (2020). Ethics and Digital Innovation in Finance. In: San-Jose, L., Retolaza, J., van Liedekerke, L. (eds) Handbook on Ethics in Finance. International Handbooks in Business Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00001-1_9-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00001-1_9-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00001-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00001-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics