Abstract
Institutional Review Board (IRB) are independent institutions aimed at approving, monitoring and reviewing human experimentations in order to protect research subjects’ rights from the necessity to increase the current medical knowledge.
After a brief historical introduction of humans experimentation, this section presents American and European regulation of this specific institution, as well the main related issues in Law and Economics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American regulation: title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations – part 46 (2009) Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations– part 56 (revised 2013)
Calabresi G (1969) Reflection on medical experimentation in human. Daedalus 98(2):387–405
Campbell EG, Weissman JS, Vogeli C, Clarridge BR, Abraham M, Marder JE, Koski G (2006) Financial relationships between institutional review board members and industry. N Engl J Med 355:2321–2329. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa061457
Coleman CH (2004) Rationalizing risk assessment in human subject research. Arizona Law Rev 46(1):1–51
Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects (1964)
European Union regulation: Directive 2001/20/EC (2001)
Emanuel EJ, Lemmens T, Elliot C (2006) Should society allow research ethics boards to be run as for-profit enterprises? PLoS Med 3(7):e309. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030309
Gustafsson BE, Quensel CE, Lanke LS, Lundqvist C, Grahnen H, Bonow BE, Krasse B (1954) The Vipeholm dental caries study; the effect of different levels of carbohydrate intake on caries activity in 436 individuals observed for five years. Acta Odontol Scand 11(3–4):232–264
Hoffman S (2001) Continued concern: human subject protection, the institutional review board, and continuing review. Tenn Law Rev. 2001 Summer 68(4):725–70
ICH Topic E 6 (R1) Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (2002)
Ippoliti R (2013a) Economic efficiency of countries’ clinical review processes and competitiveness on the market of human experimentation. Value Health 16:148–154
Ippoliti R (2013b) The market of human experimentation. Eur J Law Econ 35(1):61–85
The Nuremberg Code of Ethical Human Subjects Research Conduct (1947)
Thomas SB, Quinn SC (1991) The Tuskegee syphilis study, 1932–1972: implications for HIV education and AIDS risk programs in the black community. Am J Public Health 81:1503
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ippoliti, R. (2019). Institutional Review Board. In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G.B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_197
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_197
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7752-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7753-2
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences