Skip to main content

Institutional Review Board

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Encyclopedia of Law and Economics
  • 51 Accesses

Abstract

Institutional Review Board (IRB) are independent institutions aimed at approving, monitoring and reviewing human experimentations in order to protect research subjects’ rights from the necessity to increase the current medical knowledge.

After a brief historical introduction of humans experimentation, this section presents American and European regulation of this specific institution, as well the main related issues in Law and Economics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 819.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American regulation: title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations – part 46 (2009) Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations– part 56 (revised 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabresi G (1969) Reflection on medical experimentation in human. Daedalus 98(2):387–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell EG, Weissman JS, Vogeli C, Clarridge BR, Abraham M, Marder JE, Koski G (2006) Financial relationships between institutional review board members and industry. N Engl J Med 355:2321–2329. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa061457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman CH (2004) Rationalizing risk assessment in human subject research. Arizona Law Rev 46(1):1–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union regulation: Directive 2001/20/EC (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel EJ, Lemmens T, Elliot C (2006) Should society allow research ethics boards to be run as for-profit enterprises? PLoS Med 3(7):e309. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson BE, Quensel CE, Lanke LS, Lundqvist C, Grahnen H, Bonow BE, Krasse B (1954) The Vipeholm dental caries study; the effect of different levels of carbohydrate intake on caries activity in 436 individuals observed for five years. Acta Odontol Scand 11(3–4):232–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman S (2001) Continued concern: human subject protection, the institutional review board, and continuing review. Tenn Law Rev. 2001 Summer 68(4):725–70

    Google Scholar 

  • ICH Topic E 6 (R1) Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippoliti R (2013a) Economic efficiency of countries’ clinical review processes and competitiveness on the market of human experimentation. Value Health 16:148–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ippoliti R (2013b) The market of human experimentation. Eur J Law Econ 35(1):61–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Nuremberg Code of Ethical Human Subjects Research Conduct (1947)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas SB, Quinn SC (1991) The Tuskegee syphilis study, 1932–1972: implications for HIV education and AIDS risk programs in the black community. Am J Public Health 81:1503

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Ippoliti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ippoliti, R. (2019). Institutional Review Board. In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G.B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_197

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics