Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Treatment of Sex Offenders

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice

Synonyms

Sexual offender treatment (SOT)

Overview

This entry gives a brief overview on the effects of sexual offender treatment drawing on evidence from a number of meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Overall, this research reveals a positive effect on sexual reoffending. The syntheses suggest a mean effect of approximately d = 0.20 ± 0.10. Because of the low base rate of sexual reoffending, this equals about 25 % less recidivism of treated offenders as compared to untreated groups. However, the studies and findings are extremely heterogeneous and outcomes vary depending on many program, setting, offender, and methodological factors.

Unfortunately, the quality of the majority of evaluation studies on sex offender treatment is rather weak. However, the overall design quality is not consistently related to effect sizes, and the same applies to various other methodological and content characteristics. Cognitive-behavioral treatment, relapse prevention, and programs that adhere to the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 4,350.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 4,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading and References

  • Alexander M (1999) Sexual offender treatment efficacy revisited. Sex Abus J Res Treat 11:101–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews DA, Bonta J, Wormith S (2011) The risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model: does adding the Good Lives Model contribute to effective crime prevention? Crim Jus Behav 38:735–755

    Google Scholar 

  • Aos S, Phipps P, Barnoski R, Lieb R (2001) The comparative costs and benefits of programs to reduce crime. Version 4.0 (No. 01-05-1201). Washington State Institute for Public Policy, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks-Gordon B, Bilby C, Wells H (2006) A systematic review of psychological interventions for sexual offenders I: randomised control trials. J Forensic Psychiatr Psychol 17:442–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington DP, Gottfredson DC, Sherman LW, Welsh BC (2002) The Maryland scientific methods scale. In: Sherman LW, Farrington DP, Welsh BC, MacKenzie DL (eds) Evidence-based crime prevention. Routledge, London, pp 13–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Furby L, Weinrott MR, Blackshaw L (1989) Sex offender recidivism: a review. Psychol Bull 105:3–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher CA, Wilson DB, MacKenzie DL (2000) A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of sex offender treatment programs. Paper retrieved from http://www.wam.umd.edu/~wilsondb/papers/sexoffender.pdf

  • Goggin C, Gendreau P (2006) The implementation and maintenance of quality services in offender rehabilitation programmes. In: Hollin C, Palmer E (eds) Offending behaviour programmes. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman LS, Martis B, Fichtner CG (1999) Are sex offenders treatable? A research overview. Psychiatr Serv 50:349–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall GCN (1995) Sexual offender recidivism revisited: a meta-analysis of recent treatment studies. J Consult Clin Psychol 63:802–809

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson RK, Gordon A, Harris AJR, Marques JK, Murphy WD, Quinsey VL, Seto MC (2002) First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sex Abus J Res Treat 14:169–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson RK, Morton-Bourgon KE (2005) The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of recidivism studies. J Consult Clin Psychol 73:1154–1163

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson RK, Bourgon G, Helmus L, Hodgson S (2009) The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: a meta-analysis. Crim Justice Behav 36:865–891

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey MW, Cullen FT (2007) The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: a review of systematic reviews. Ann Rev Law Soc Sci 3:297–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Lösel F, Köferl P (1989) Evaluation research on correctional treatment in West Germany: a meta-analysis. In: Wegener H, Lösel F Haisch J (eds) Criminal behavior and the justice system. Springer, New York pp 334–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Lösel F (2000) The efficacy of sexual offender treatment: a brief review of German and international evaluations. In: van Koppen PJ, Roos N (eds) Rationality, information and progress in law and psychology. Metajuridica, Maastricht, pp 145–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Lösel F, Schmucker M (2005) The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: a comprehensive meta-analysis. J Exper Criminol 1:117–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Lösel F (2007) Doing evaluation in criminology: balancing scientific and practical demands. In: King RD, Wincup E (eds) Doing research on crime and justice, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford pp 141–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Lösel F (2012) Offender treatment and rehabilitation: what works? In: Maguire M, Morgan R, Reiner R (eds) The Oxford handbook of criminology, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 986–1016

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall WL (2009) Manualization: a blessing or a curse? J Sex Aggress 15:109–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall WL, Marshall LE (2010) Can treatment be effective with sexual offenders or does it do harm? A response to Hanson (2010) and Rice (2010). Sex Offender Treat 5(2), online

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall WL, Jones R, Ward T, Johnston P, Barbaree HE (1991) Treatment outcome with sex offenders. Clin Psychol Rev 11:465–485

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath RJ, Cumming GF, Burchard BL, Zeoli S, Ellerby L (2010) Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuse management: the Safer Society 2009 North American Survey. The Safer Society Press, Brandon

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurran M (2002) Motivation to change: selection criterion or treatment need? In: McMurran M (ed) Motivating offenders to change. Wiley, Chichester, pp 3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Polizzi DM, MacKenzie DL, Hickman LJ (1999) What works in adult sex offender treatment? A review of prison- and non-prison-based treatment programs. J Offend Ther Comp Criminol 43: 357–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitzel LR, Carbonell JL (2006) The effectiveness of sexual offender treatment for juveniles as measured by recidivism: a meta-analysis. Sex Abus J Res Treat 18:401–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmucker M, Lösel F (2008) Does sexual offender treatment work? A systematic review of outcome evaluations. Psicothema 20:10–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmucker M, Lösel F (2013) Evaluating the effects of sexual offender treatment: an international meta-analysis of sound quality studies. Paper submitted for publication

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker DF, McGovern SK, Poey EL, Otis KE (2004) Treatment effectiveness for male adolescent sexual offenders: a meta-analysis and review. J Child Sex Abus 13:281–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware J, Mann RE, Wakeling HC (2009) Group versus individual treatment: what is the best modality for treating sexual offenders? Sex Abus Aust NZ 1:70–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger LE, Sreenivasan S, Garrick T, Osran H (2005) The impact of surgical castration on sexual recidivism risk among sexually violent predatory offenders. J Am Acad Psychiatr Law 33:16–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd D, Lum CM, Petrosino A (2001) Does research design affect study outcomes in criminal justice? Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 578:50–70

    Google Scholar 

  • White P, Bradley C, Ferriter M, Hatzipetrou L (2009) Managements for people with disorders of sexual preference and for convicted sexual offenders [Cochrane Review]. The Cochrane Library (4). Oxford: Update Software

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Friedrich Lösel

  2. Institute of Psychology, University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany

    Friedrich Lösel & Martin Schmucker

Authors
  1. Friedrich Lösel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Schmucker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Friedrich Lösel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Gerben Bruinsma

  2. VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Gerben Bruinsma

  3. Department of Criminology, Law and Society, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA

    David Weisburd

  4. Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel

    David Weisburd

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Lösel, F., Schmucker, M. (2014). Treatment of Sex Offenders. In: Bruinsma, G., Weisburd, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_352

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_352

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5689-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5690-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation