Abstract
The building block protein folding model states that the native protein structure is the product of a combinatorial assembly of relatively structurally independent contiguous parts of the protein that possess a hydrophobic core, i.e., building blocks (BBs). According to this model, our group proposed a three-stage scheme for a feasible time-wise semi ab-intio protein structure prediction. Given a protein sequence, at the first stage of the prediction scheme, we propose cutting the sequence into structurally assigned BBs. Next, we perform a combinatorial assembly and attempt to predict the relative three-dimensional arrangement of the BBs. In the third stage, we refine and rank the assemblies. The scheme has proven to be very promising in reducing the complexity of the protein folding problem and gaining insight into the protein folding process. In this chapter, we describe the different stages of the scheme and discuss a possible application of the model to protein design.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Struthers, M. D., Cheng, R. P., and Imperiali, B. (1996) Design of a monomeric 23-residue polypeptide with defined tertiary structure. Science 271, 342–345.
Tsai, C. J. and Nussinov, R. (2001) The building block folding model and the kinetics of protein folding. Protein Eng. 14, 723–733.
Tsai, C. J., Maizel, J. V., and Nussinov, R. (2000) Anatomy of protein structures: Visualizing how a one-dimensional protein chain folds into a three-dimensional shape. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97, 12,038–12,043.
Tsai, C. J., Polverino de Laureto, P., Fontana, A., and Nussinov, R. (2002) Comparison of protein fragments identified by limited proteolysis and by computational cutting of proteins. Protein Sci. 11, 1753–1770.
Sinha, N., Tsai, C. J., and Nussinov, R. (2001) Building blocks, hinge-bending motions and protein topology. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 19, 369–380.
Inbar, Y., Benyamini, H., Nussinov, R., and Wolfson, H. J. (2005) Prediction of multimolecular assemblies by multiple docking. J. Mol. Biol. 349, 435–447.
Tsai, H. H., Tsai, C. J., Ma, B., and Nussinov, R. (2004) In silico protein design by combinatorial assembly of protein building blocks. Protein Sci. 13, 2753–2765.
Bernstein, F. C., Koetzle, T. F., Williams, G. J. B., et al. (1977) The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 112, 535–542.
Haspel, N., Tsai, C. J., Wolfson, H., and Nussinov, R. (2003) Hierarchical protein folding pathways: a computational study of protein fragments. Protein 51, 203–215.
Wainreb, G. (2005) Templating the building blocks and secondary-structure guided superimposition tool. Master’s thesis. Faculty of medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Wainreb, G., Haspel, N., Wolfson, H., and Nussinov, R. (2006) A permissive secondary structure-guided superimposition tool for clustering of protein fragments toward protein structure prediction via fragment assembly. Bioinformatics, in press.
Ballard, D. H. (1981) Generalizing the Hough transform to detect arbitrary shapes. Pattern Recognit. 13, 111–122.
Lamdan, Y. and Wolfson, H. J. (1988) Geometric hashing: a general and efficient model-based recognition scheme. In: Second International Conference on Computer Vision (Tampa, FL, December 5–8, 1988), Washington, D.C., IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 238–249.
Wolfson, H. J. (1990) Model-based recognition by geometric hashing. In Proc. 1st. Euro. Conf. on Comput. Vis April 23–27, 1990, Antibes, France. 526–536.
Haspel, N., Tsai, C.-J., Wolfson, H., and Nussinov, R. (2003) Reducing the computational complexity of protein folding via fragment folding and assembly. Protein Sci. 12, 1177–1187.
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., and Lipman, D. J. (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410.
Cayley, A. (1889) A theorem on trees. Quart. J. Math. 23, 276–378.
Kabsch, W. and Sander, C. (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22, 2577–2637.
Cormen, T., Leiserson, C., and Rivest, R. (1990) Introduction to Algorithms, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Norel, R., Lin, S. L., Wolfson, H., and Nussinov, R. (1995) Molecular surface complementarity at protein-protein interfaces: the critical role played by surface normals at well placed, sparse points in docking. J. Mol. Biol. 252, 263–273.
Polak, V. (2003) Budda: backbone unbound docking application. Master’s thesis School of Comp. Sci., Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
Duhovny, D., Nussinov, R., and Wolfson, H. (2002) Efficient unbound docking of rigid molecules. In: Workshop on Algorithms in Bioinformatics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2452, (Guigo, R. and Gusfield, D., eds.), Springer Verlag, Rome, Italy, pp. 185–200.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Humana Press Inc.
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Haspel, N. et al. (2007). A Hierarchical Protein Folding Scheme Based on the Building Block Folding Model. In: Bai, Y., Nussinov, R. (eds) Protein Folding Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology™, vol 350. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59745-189-4:189
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59745-189-4:189
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-622-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-189-5
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols