Advertisement

Cell Migration pp 235-245 | Cite as

The Xenopus Embryo as a Model System for Studies of Cell Migration

Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology™ book series (MIMB, volume 294)

Abstract

In this chapter, we describe procedures for the microsurgical removal of cells and tissues from early-stage embryos of the amphibian Xenopus laevis. Using simple culture conditions and artificial substrates, these preparations undergo a variety of quantifiable cellular behaviors that closely mimic cell migration in vivo. Two general methods are described. The first includes procedures for obtaining a dorsal marginal zone explant from early gastrulae in order to investigate the sheet-like extension and migration of the mesendoderm that spreads to cover the inner surface of the blastocoel roof in intact embryos. This preparation allows high-resolution analyses of cellular and subcellular events in a contiguous tissue preparation. The second describes methods for the isolation of cranial neural crest cells from tailbud stage embryos. Cranial neural crest tissue cultured in vitro on fibronectin will undergo segmentation and migrate as streams of cells as they do in the developing head. Each of these robust preparations provides an excellent example of the migratory events that are possible to observe in vitro using amphibian embryos.

Key Words

Xenopus embryo explant cell migration cell adhesion gastrulation neurulation neural crest cells 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Keller, R., Davidson, L., Edlund, A., Elul, T., Ezin, M., Shook, D., et al. (2000) Mechanisms of convergence and extension by cell intercalation. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 355, 897–922.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Keller, R. (2002) Shaping the vertebrate body plan by polarized embryonic cell movements. Science 298, 1950–1954.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Winklbauer, R., Nagel, M., Selchow, A., and Wacker, S. (1996) Mesoderm migration in the Xenopus gastrula. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 40, 305–311.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sadaghiani, B. and Thiebaud, C. H. (1987) Neural crest development in the Xenopus laevis embryo, studied by interspecific transplantation and scanning electron microscopy. Dev. Biol. 124, 91–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davidson, L. A., Hoffstrom, B. G., Keller, R., and DeSimone, D. W. (2002) Mesendoderm extension and mantle closure in Xenopus laevis gastrulation: combined roles for integrin α5, β1, fibronectin, and tissue geometry. Dev. Biol. 242, 109–129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alfandari, D., Cousin, H., Gaultier, A., Hoffstrom, B. G., and DeSimone, D. W. (2003) Integrin α5 β1 supports the migration of Xenopus cranial neural crest on fibronectin. Dev. Biol. 60, 449–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sater, A. K., Steinhardt, R. A., and Keller, R. (1993) Induction of neuronal differentiation by planar signals in Xenopus embryos. Dev. Dyn. 197, 268–280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kay, B. K. and Peng, H. B. (1991) Xenopus laevis: Practical Uses in Cell and Molecular Biology, Academic Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sive, H. L., Grainger, R. M., and Harland, R. M. (2000) Early Development of Xenopus Laevis: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wallingford, J. B., Rowning, B. A., Vogeli, K. M., Rothbacher, U., Fraser, S. E., and Harland, R. M. (2000) Disheveled controls cell polarity during Xenopus gas-trulation. Nature 405, 81–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Na, J., Marsden, M., and DeSimone, D. W. (2003) Differential regulation of cell adhesive functions by integrin α subunit cytoplasmic tails in vivo. J. Cell Sci. 116, 2333–2343.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nieuwkoop, P. D. and Faber, J. (1994) Normal Table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin), Garland Publishing, Inc., New York, NY.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sokal, R. R. (1981) Biometry, W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ezin, A. M., Skoglund, P., and Keller, R. (2003) The midline (notochord and notoplate) patterns the cell motility underlying convergence and extension of the Xenopus neural plate. Dev. Biol. 256, 100–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Davidson, L. A. and Keller, R. E. (1999) Neural tube closure in Xenopus laevis involves medial migration, directed protrusive activity, cell intercalation and convergent extension. Development 126, 4547–4556.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Batschelet, E. (1981) Circular Statistics in Biology, Academic Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Elul, T., Koehl, M. A., and Keller, R. (1997) Cellular mechanism underlying neural convergent extension in Xenopus laevis embryos. Dev. Biol. 191, 243–258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Borchers, A., Epperlein, H. H., and Wedlich, D. (2000) An assay system to study migratory behavior of cranial neural crest cells in Xenopus. Dev. Genes Evol. 210, 217–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cell BiologyUniversity of Virginia School of MedicineCharlottesville

Personalised recommendations

Cite protocol

Buy options