Skip to main content

Novel Scoring Methods in Virtual Ligand Screening

  • Protocol
Chemoinformatics

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology™ ((MIMB,volume 275))

Abstract

Several different approaches have been proposed in the last decade to assess the binding affinity of a virtual small molecule ligand to a target protein, particularly with respect to screening large compound databases. Here we review the methods that have been proposed, and discuss techniques for optimizing scoring functions that have been applied in industrial settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. DesJarlais, R. L., Seibel G. L., Kuntz I. D., et al. (1990) Structure-based design of nonpeptide inhibitors specific for the human immunodeficiency virus 1 protease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 6644–6648.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zwanzig, R. W. (1954) High-temperature equation of state by a perturbation method. I. Nonpolar gases. J. Chem. Phys. 22, 1420–1426.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Koehler, K. F., Rao, S. N., and Snyder, J. P. (1996) Modeling drug-receptor interactions. In Guidebook on molecular modeling in drug design, Claude Cohen (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 235–336.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Meng, E. C., Shoichet, B. K., and Kuntz, I. D. (1992) Automated docking with grid-based energy evaluation. J. Comp. Chem. 13, 505–524.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tame, J. R. H. (1999) Scoring functions: a view from the bench. J. Comp.-Aid. Mol. Des. 13, 99–108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gehlhaar, D. K., Verkhivker, G. M., Rejto, P. A., et al. (1995) Molecular recognition of the inhibitor AG-1343 by HIV-1 protease: conformationally flexible docking by evolutionary programming. Chem. Biol. 2, 317–324.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Böhm, H.-J. (1994) The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known threedimensional structure. J. Comput. Mol. Design 8, 243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eldridge, M. D., Murray, C. W., Auton, T. R., Paolini, G. V., and Mee, R. P. (1997) Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes. J. Comput. Mol. Design 11, 425–445.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Head, R. D., Smythe, M. L., Oprea, T. I., Waller, C. L., Green, S. M., and Marshall, G. R. (1996). VALIDATE: a new method for the receptor-based prediction of binding affinities of novel ligands. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 3959–3969.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dixon, J. S. (1997) Evaluation of the CASP2 docking section. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. Suppl. 1, 198–204.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Muegge, I. and Martin, Y. C. (1999) A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach. J. Med. Chem. 42, 791–804.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gohlke, H., Hendlich, M., and Klebe G. (2000) Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Bio. 295, 337–356.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mitchell, J. B. O., Laskowski, R. A., Alex, A., and Thornton, J. M. (1999) BLEEP-potential of mean force describing protein-ligand interactions: I. Generating potential. J. Comp. Chem. 20, 1165–1176.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sippl, M. J. (1993). Boltzmann’s principle, knowledge-based mean fields and protein folding. An approach to the computational determination of protein structures. J. Comp.-Aid. Mol. Des. 7, 473–501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas, P. D. and Dill, K. A. (1996) Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: how accurate are they? J. Mol. Bio. 257, 457–469.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Charifson, P. S., Corkery, J. S., Murcko, M. A., and Walters, W. P. (1999) Consensus scoring: a method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. J. Med. Chem. 42, 5100–5109.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bissantz, C., Folkers, G., and Rognan, D. (2000). Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations. J. Med. Chem. 43, 4759–4767.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stahl, M. and Rarey, M. (2001) Detailed analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening. J. Med. Chem. 44, 1035–1042.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Humana Press Inc.

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Pick, D. (2004). Novel Scoring Methods in Virtual Ligand Screening. In: Bajorath, J. (eds) Chemoinformatics. Methods in Molecular Biology™, vol 275. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-802-1:439

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-802-1:439

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-261-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-802-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics