Skip to main content

Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization in Tumor Pathology

  • Protocol

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Medicine ((MIMM,volume 97))

Abstract

Ever since the correlation was found between the pathogenesis of diseases and genomic alterations, molecular cytogenetic techniques have found a place in molecular medicine. These techniques are used in tracing gene and genomic abnormalities that are underlying in the development of cancer and genetic diseases. In 1969, Gall and Pardue introduced a technique known as “in situ hybridization” (ISH) to localize nucleic acids in individual cells (1). At that time, the capabilities of ISH were limited to highly repetitive sequences using radioactively labeled probes that were subsequences visualized by autoradiography. The use of radioisotopes has many disadvantages and has been replaced in DNA ISH by nonradioactive detection methods. The most commonly used reporter molecules are haptens, such as biotin and digoxigenin, which can be incorporated easily in the probe DNA. The tagged probes are then detected with labeled antibodies against the specific tag or, as in the case of biotin, with a labeled avidin molecule. Since the first report of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) (2), the principle of FISH has remained essentially the same, with the exception that biotin and digoxigenin have partly been replaced by directly fluorochrome-conjugated nucleotides, which simplifies the laboratory protocol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Protocol
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

References

  1. Gall, J. G. and Pardue, M. L. (1969) Formation and detection of RNA-DNA hybrid molecules in cytological specimens. PNAS 63, 378–383.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pinkel, D., Straume, T., and Gray, J. (1986) Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative high sensitivity fluorecense hybridization. PNAS 83, 2934–2938.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hopman, A. H., Claessen, S., and Speel, E. J. (1997) Multi-colour brightfield in situ hybridisation on tissue sections. Histochem. Cell. Biol. 108, 291–298.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tanner, M., Gancberg, D., Di Leo, A., et al. (2000) Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH): a practical new alternative for FISH in detection of HER-2/neu oncogene amplification. Am. J. Pathol. 157, 1467–1472.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Davison, J. M., Morgan, T. W., Hsi, B. L., et al. (1998) Subtracted, unique-sequence, in situ hybridization: experimental and diagnostic applications. Am. J. Pathol. 153, 1401–1409.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tanner, M., Järvinen, P., and Isola, J. (2001) Amplification of HER-2/neu and topoisomerase IIoc in primary and metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res. 61, 5345–5348.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pauletti, G., Godolphin, W., Press, M. F., et al. (1996) Detection and quantitation of HER-2/neu gene amplification in human breast cancer archival material using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Oncogene 13, 63–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Press, M. F., Bernstein, L., Thomas, P. A., et al. (1997) HER-2/neu gene amplification characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization: poor prognosis in node-negative breast carcinomas. J. Clin. Oncol. 15, 2894–2904.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ross, J. S. and Fletcher, J. A. (1999) HER-2/neu (c-erb-B2) gene and protein in breast cancer. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 112, S53–S67.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dandachi, N., Dietze, O., and Hauser-Kronberger, C. (2002) Chromogenic in situ hybridization: a novel approach to a practical and sensitive method for the detection of HER2 oncogene in archival human breast carcinoma. Lab. Invest. 82(8), 1007–1014.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Isola, J., Tanner, M., Salminen, T., et al. HER-2/neu oncogene status by chromogenic in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry: a study on 1,728 breast cancer patients. (Submitted.)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kumamoto, H., Sasano, H., Taniguchi, T., et al. (2001) Chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis of HER-2/neu status in breast carcinoma: application in screening of patients for trastuzumab (Herceptin) therapy. Pathol. Int. 51(8), 579–584

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rummukainen, J., Salminen, T., Lundin, J., et al. (2001) Comparison of c-myc oncogene amplification by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) and FISH in archival breast cancer tissue array samples. Lab. Invest. 81, 1545–1552.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Savinainen, K., Linja, M., Saramäki, O., et al. (2002) Expression and gene copy number analysis of ERBB2 oncogene in prostate cancer. Am. J. Pathol. 160, 339–345.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tanskanen, M., Jahkola, T., Asko-Seljavaara, S., et al. (2003) HER-2 oncogene amplification in extramammary Paget’s disease. Histopathology, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tubbs, R., Pettay, J., Skacel, M., et al. (2002) Gold-facilitated in situ hybridization: a bright-field autometallographic alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization for detection of Her-2/neu gene amplification. Am. J. Pathol. 160(5), 1589–1595.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao, J., Wu, R., Au, A., et al. (2002) Determination of HER2 gene amplification by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) in archival breast carcinoma. Mod. Pathol. 15(6), 657–665.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Isola, J., Tanner, M. (2004). Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization in Tumor Pathology. In: Roulston, J.E., Bartlett, J.M.S. (eds) Molecular Diagnosis of Cancer. Methods in Molecular Medicine, vol 97. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-760-2:133

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-760-2:133

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-160-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-760-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics