Skip to main content

Transplantation Chimeras

Use in Analyzing Mechanisms of Avian Development

  • Protocol
Developmental Biology Protocols

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology™ ((MIMB,volume 135))

  • 1327 Accesses

Abstract

The word chimera originally referred to a mythological beast with the head of a lion, the body of a goat, and the tail of a serpent, but it has come to mean any individual made up of the parts of more than one individual. Transplantation chimeras, which can be made in many species and sometimes between species, are formed when tissue is grafted from one embryo (the donor) to another (the host) and permitted to incorporate. This technique allows one to follow a specific group of cells (the graft) through a period of development and to determine the fates and locations of their progeny. To allow graft cells to be distinguished from the cells of the host after culture the graft is usually labeled with vital fluorescent dyes (see Note 1) or after fixation by using immunocytochemistry or a histological stain. Because chimeras can be made between a host and donor of the same stage (isochronic) or different stages (heterochronic), between similar tissues or regions (homotopic) or different tissues or regions (heterotopic), and between members of the same species (intraspecific) or different species (interspecific), minor variations in the technique allow one to investigate several parameters of development including cell fate, potency, commitment, evolutionary conservation of signals, and cell movement. For example, isochronic, homotopic grafting is used for fate mapping (and cell movement) studies (13), heterotopic and heterochronic grafting yield information about competency and commitment (311), and interspecific grafts can demonstrate evolutionary conservation of signaling pathways (1214) and may eventually lead to the analysis of the behavior of mutant mouse-embryo cells in chick-embryo hosts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Schoenwolf, G. C., Garcia-Martinez, V., and Dias, M. S. (1992) Mesoderm movement and fate during avian gastrulation and neurulation. Dev. Dynamics 193, 235–248.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Garcia-Martinez, V., Alvarez, I. S., and Schoenwolf, G. C. (1993) Locations of the ectodermal and nonectodermal subdivisions of the epiblast at stages 3 and 4 of avian gastrulation and neurulation. J. Exp. Zool. 267, 431–446.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schoenwolf, G. and Alvarez, I. S. (1991) Specification of neurepithelium and surface epithelium in avian transplantation chimeras. Development 112, 713–722.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Alvarez, I. S. and Schoenwolf, G. C. (1991) Patterns of neurepithelial cell rearrangement during avian neurulation are determined prior to notochordal inductive interactions. Dev. Biol. 143, 78–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bally-Cuif, L. and Wassef, M. (1994) Ectopic induction and reorganization of Wnt-1 expression in quail/chick chimeras. Development 120, 3379–3394.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Darnell, D. K. and Schoenwolf, G. C. (1995) Dorsoventral patterning of the avian mesencephalon/metencephalon: Role of the notochord and floor plate in suppressing Engrailed-2. J. Neurobiol. 26, 62–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Garcia-Martinez, V. and Schoenwolf, G. C. (1992) Positional control of mesoderm movement and fate during avian gastrulation and neurulation. Dev. Dynamics 193, 249–256.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Martinez, S. and Alvarado-Mallart, R.-M. (1990) Expression of the homeobox Chick-en gene in chick-quail chimeras with inverted mes-metencephalic grafts. Dev. Biol. 139, 432–436.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakamura, H. (1990) Do CNS anlagen have plasticity in differentiation? Analysis in quail-chick chimera. Brain Res. 511, 122–128.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakamura, H., Nakano, K. E., Igawa, H. H., Takagi, S., and Fujisawa, H. (1986) Plasticity and rigidity of differentiation of brain vesicles studied in quail-chick chimeras. Differentiation 19, 187–193.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Selleck, M. and, Stern, C. D. (1992) Commitment of mesoderm cells in Hensen’s node of the chick embryo to notochord and somite. Development 114, 403–415.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Davidson, D. R., Crawley, A., Hill, R. E., and Tickle, C. (1991) Position-dependent expression of two related homeobox genes in developing vertebrate limbs. Nature 352, 429–431.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fontaine-Perus, J., Jarno, V., Fournier le Ray, C., Li, Z., and Paulin, D. (1995) Mouse chick chimera: A new model to study the in ovo developmental potentialities of mammalian somites. Development 121, 1705–1718.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Itasaki, N., Sharpe, J., Morrison, A., and Krumlauf, R. (1996) Reprogramming Hox expression in the vertebrate hindbrain: influence of paraxial mesoderm and rhombomere transposition. Neuron 16, 487–500.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Le Douarin, N. (1973) A Feulgen-positive nucleolus. Exp. Cell Res. 77, 459–468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Inagaki, T., Garcia-Martinez, V., and Schoenwolf, G. C. (1993) Regulative ability of the prospective cardiogenic and vasculogenic areas of the primitive streak during avian gastrulation. Dev. Dyn. 197, 57–68.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Daston, G. P., ed. (1996) Molecular and Cellular Methods in Developmental Toxicology, CRC, New York, p. 243.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Darnell, D.K., Schoenwolf, G.C. (2000). Transplantation Chimeras. In: Walker, J.M., Tuan, R.S., Lo, C.W. (eds) Developmental Biology Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology™, vol 135. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-685-1:367

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-685-1:367

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-89603-852-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-685-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics