Skip to main content

Comparative Genomic Hybridization

  • Protocol
Metastasis Research Protocols

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Medicine ((MIMM,volume 57))

Abstract

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a molecular cytogenetic technique used to screen the entire genome for gains and losses of genetic material (1). It is being used increasingly in the study of cancer genetics to identify genes important in the initiation, progression, and, of particular relevance here, metastasis of tumors (2-4).One of the advantages of the technique is that the entire genome is examined in a single experiment, so there is no necessity to know the genetic region of interest prior to investigation. Once regions of gain or loss have been identified, these regions can be defined further using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (described in Chapter 14 by Goker and Shipley) or molecular genetic techniques. CGH is essentially a modified in situ hybridization. Differentially labeled test or tumor DNA (green) and reference or normal DNA (red) are cohybridized to normal metaphase spreads. Differences in the copy number between test and reference DNA are seen as differences in the ratio of green to red fluorescence intensity on the metaphase chromosomes. Images of the metaphases are captured and quantification of the fluorescence ratios performed using a digital image analysis system. Regions of chromosomal gain are seen as an increased fluorescence ratio whereas regions of loss are seen as a decrease in the fluorescence ratio. Losses are detectable when the region affected exceeds 10 Mb (5), smaller regions of gain are detected if there is high level amplification, for example a 2-Mb region that is amplified five times will be visualized (6). For each tumor, 5/210 metaphases are analyzed and an average fluorescence ratio for each chromosome obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kallioniemi, A., Kallioniemi, O.-P., Sudar, D., Rutovitz, D., Gray, J., Waldman, F., and Pinkel, D. (1992) Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cyto-genetic analysis of solid tumours. Science 258, 818–821.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cher, M. L., Bova, G. S., Moore, D. H., Small, E. J., Carroll, P. R., Pin, S. S., et al. (1996) Genetic alterations in untreated metastases and androgen-independent prostate cancer detected by comparative genomic hybridization and allelotyping. Cancer Res. 56, 3091–3102.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gronwald, J., Storkel, S., Holtgreve-Grez, H., Hadaczek, P., Brinkschmidt, C., Jauch, A., et al. (1997) Comparison of DNA gains and losses in primary renal clear cell carcinomas and metastatic sites: importance of 1q and 3p copy number changes in metastatic events. Cancer Res. 57, 481–487.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuukasjarvi, T., Karhu, R., Tanner, M., Kahkonen, M., Schaffer, A., Nupponen, N., et al. (1997) Genetic heterogeneity and clonal evolution underlying development of asynchronous metastasis in human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 57, 1597–1604.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bentz, M., Plesch, A., Stilgenbauer, S., Dohner, H., and Lichter, P. (1998) Minimal sizes of deletions detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 21, 172–175.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kallioniemi, O.-P., Kallioniemi, A., Piper, J., Isola, J., Waldman, F. M., Gray, J. W., and Pinkel, D. (1994) Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 10, 231–243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nishizaki, T., Devries, S., Chew, K., Goodson, W. H., Ljung, B. M., Thor, A., and Waldman, F. M. (1997) Genetic alterations in primary breast cancers and their metastases-direct comparison using modified comparative genomic hybridization Genes Chromosomes Cancer 19, 267–272.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Telenius, H., Carter, N. P., Bebb, C. E., Nordenskjold, M., Ponder, B. A., and Tunnacliffe, A. (1992) Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primate. Genomics 13, 718–725.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Speicher, M. R., du Manoir, S., Schrock, E., Holtgreve, G. H., Schoell, B., Lengauer, C., et al. (1993) Molecular cytogenetic analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, solid tumors by comparative genomic hybridization after universal DNA-amplification. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2, 1907–1914.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore, D. H., and, Pallavicini, M., Cher, M. L., and Gray, J. W. (1997) A t-statistic for objective interpretation of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) profiles. Cytometry 28, 183–190.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Solinas-Toldo, S., Wallrapp, C., Muller-Pillasch, F., Bentz, M., Gress, T., and Lichter, P. (1996) Mapping of chromosomal imbalances in pancreatic carcinoma by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res. 56, 3802–3807.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karhu, R., Kahkonen, M., Kuukasjarvi, T., Pennanen, S., Tirkkonen, M., and Kallioniemi, O. (1997) Quality control of CGH: impact of metaphase chromosomes and the dynamic range of hybridization. Cytometry 28, 198–205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Courjal, F. and Theillet, C. (1997) Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of breast tumors with predetermined profiles of DNA amplification. Cancer Res. 57, 4368–4377.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuukasjarvi, T., Tanner, M., Pennanen, S., Karhu, R., Visakorpi, T., and Isola, J. (1997) Optimizing DOP-PCR for universal amplification of small DNA samples in comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 18, 94–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Humana Press Inc.

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Roylance, R. (2001). Comparative Genomic Hybridization. In: Brooks, S.A., Schumacher, U. (eds) Metastasis Research Protocols. Methods in Molecular Medicine, vol 57. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-136-1:223

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-136-1:223

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-89603-610-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-136-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics