Advertisement

Genomic DNA Digestion and Ribotyping

  • J. Zoe Jordens
Part of the Methods in Molecular Medicine™ book series (MIMM, volume 15)

Abstract

Bacteria may need to be characterized for a number of reasons. Newly discovered organisms are characterized to determine their taxonomic position; clinical isolates are characterized to provide an indication of pathogenic potential and likely antibiotic susceptibility. Such studies generally mvolve characterization to the genus and species level and provide an identification for the organism. Highly discrimmatory methods of intraspecies characterization are required for epidemiologic purposes in order to establish sources and routes of mfection to which control measures may be directed. For an mdlvidual patient, differentiation between relapsmg infection or reinfection may ard treatment choice and clinical management. The pattern of DNA fragments produced by digestion of genomic DNA with a restriction endonuclease, directly or after hybridization, can be highly discrimmatory and enable strain characterization, or typing, suitable for epidemiologic studies. The practice of obtaining these patterns (or profiles) for epidemiologic purposes is the subject of the present chapter, although the methods can also be applied to questions regarding identification at higher taxonomic levels.

Keywords

Ethidium Bromide Wash Solution Isoamyl Alcohol Blocking Reagent Epidemiologic Purpose 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Forbes, K. J., Bruce, K. D., Jordens,,J. Z., Ball, A., and Pennington, T. H. (1991) Rapid methods in bacterial DNA fingerprinting. J Gen Microbiol l37, 205l–2058Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Owen, R. J.(1989) Chromosomal DNA fingerprinting-a new method of species and strain identificatton applicable to nncrobial pathogens J Med. Mlcrobiol 30, 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jordens, J. Z. and Leaves, N. I. (1997) Source of variation detected in ribotyping patterns of Haemophilus injluenzae Comparison of traditional ribotyping, PCR-ribotyping and rRNA restriction analysis J Med Microbiol 46, 763–772.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grimont, F. and Grimont, P. A. D. (1986) Ribosomal ribonucleic acid gene restriction patterns as potential taxonomic tools Ann Inst Pasteur/Mzcrobiol 137B, 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bingen, E H., Denamur, E., and Elion, J (1994) Use of ribotyping in epidemiological surveillance of nosocomial outbreaks Clan Microbiol Rev 7, 31l–327Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tenover, F C., Arbeit, R D., Goering, R. V., Mickelsen, P A., Murray, B. E, Persing, D H, and Swaminathan, B. (1995) Interpreting chromosomal DNA restrtction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis criteria for bacterial strain typing J Clin Microbiol. 33, 2233–2239.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leaves, N I. and Jordens J Z. (1994) Development of a ribotyping scheme for Haemophilus ininfuenzae type b, Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Drs 13, 1038–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pitcher, D G, Saunders, N A, and Owen, R. J (1989) Rapid extraction of bacterial genomic DNA with guanidium thiocyanate Lett Appl Microbiol 8, 15l–l56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pitcher, D G., Owen, R. J, Dyal, P., and Beck, A. (1987) Synthesis of a biotinylated DNA probe to detect ribosomal RNA cistrons in Providencia stuartu, FEMS Mucrobiol Lett 48, 283–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Zoe Jordens
    • 1
  1. 1.Oxford Public Health LaboratoryJohn Radcliffe HospitalOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations