Advertisement

Co-Immunoprecipitation

Identification of Interacting Proteins
  • Neil G. Anderson
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology™ book series (MIMB, volume 88)

Abstract

The targeting of proteins, via precise protein-protein interactions, to specific intracellular locations, is a recurring theme in cell biology. This has become particularly evident from the explosion of recent studies in the general area of signal transduction. Over the past 5–10 yr great strides have been made in understanding the intracellular signaling processes that regulate proliferative, metabolic, and other cellular responses. These mechanisms are complex and usually involve the participation of many signaling molecules linked by a series of catalytic and noncatalytic interactions. The physical association of two or more proteins in a signaling pathway is necessary in order to attain efficiency of signaling and to maintain specificity of response. A number of categories of protein-protein interaction are known to occur. These include the interaction between enzyme and substrate, the interaction between src homology 2 (SH2) domains and phosphotyrosyl residues within specific peptide sequences, and the binding of SH3 domains to polyprolyl sequences (1). The development of techniques that can provide evidence for the interaction of two or more proteins in the intact cell has been instrumental in establishing the existence of many signaling pathways. This chapter aims to describe one such technique, that of co-immunoprecipitation.

Keywords

Cellular Protein Molecular Mass Range Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Sample Buffer Intracellular Signaling Process Specific Peptide Sequence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Cohen, G. B., Ren, R., and Baltimore, D. (1995) Modular binding domains in signal transduction proteins. Cell 80, 237–248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Garrison, J. C. (1993) Study of protein phosphorylation in intact cells, in Protein Phosphorylation: A Practical Approach (Hardie, D. G., ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Feuerstein, N., Huang, D., and Prystowsky, M. B. (1995) Rapamycin selectively blocks interleukin-2-induced proliferating cell nuclear antigen gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 9454–9458.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bradford, M. M. (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Towbin, H., Staehelin, T., and Gordon, J. (1979) Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76, 4350–4355.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Backer, J. M., Myers, M. G., Shoelson, S. E., Chin, D. J., Sun, X. J., Miralpeix, M., Hu, P., Margolis, B., Skolnik, E. Y., Schlessinger, J., and White, M. F. (1992) Phosphatidylinositol 3′ kinase is activated by association with IRS-1 during insulin stimulation EMBO J. 11, 3469–3479.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    He, T.-C., Jiang, N., Zhuang, H., and Wojchowski, D. M. (1995) Erythropoietin induced recruitment of Shc via a receptor phosphotyrosine-independent, JAK-2-associated pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 11,055–11,061.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neil G. Anderson
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Hannah Research InstituteAyr, ScotlandUK
  2. 2.School of biological SciencesUniversity of ManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations