Agrobacterium Protocols pp 121-128 | Cite as
Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Potato Genotypes
- 9 Citations
- 1k Downloads
Abstract
The potato (Solanum tuberosum) is the world’s fourth major food crop. The potato is ideally suited for improvement by modern genetic manipulation methods, as it is highly amenable to a wide range of various tissue-culture techniques (1). In recent years, a combination of cellular and molecular approaches, including somatic hybridization and genetic transformation, have been employed to improve existing potato cultivars (2). Genetic transformation, however, provides a more direct and controlled method for manipulating the genome of potato for both basic and applied research purposes (3). This chapter describes the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method for potato genotypes. Agrobacterium tumefaciens and its Ti-plasmid have been used extensively as vectors to introduce engineered genes into plants (4). In order for genetic modification via Agrobacterium to be successful, both a reproducible regeneration system and an efficient DNA delivery system directed toward those cells capable of regeneration are mandatory. An ability to select the transformed cells from a large number of untransformed cells is also essential, because transformation frequency is usually between 5 and 50%.
Keywords
MS30 Medium Somatic Hybridization MS30 Liquid Medium Zeatin Riboside Potato GenotypeReferences
- 1.Bajaj, Y. P. S. (1987) Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry—3. Potato. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- 2.Kumar, A., Cooper-Bland, S., and Powell, W. (1992) Transfer of disease resistance genes into crop plants the role of biotechnology, in Proceedings of the Symposium on Interactions Between Plants and Microorganisms (Wolf, J. N., ed.), International Foundation for Science, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 475–490.Google Scholar
- 3.Kumar, A., Graham, J., Whitty, P., and Lyon, J. (1992) Genetic transformation in plants, in Annual Report of the Scottish Crop Research Institute, 1991 (Perry, D. A. and Heilbronn, T. D., eds.), SCRI, Dundee, UK, pp. 29–32.Google Scholar
- 4.Klee, J., Horsch, R., and Rogers, S. (1987) Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation and its further application to plant biology. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 38, 467–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.De Block, M. (1988) Genotype-dependent leaf disc transformation of potato (Solanum tuberosum) using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Theor. Appl. Genet. 76, 767–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Barker, H., Reavy, B., Kumar, A., Webster, K. D., and Mayo, M. A. (1992) Restricted virus multiplication in potato transformed with the coat protein gene of potato leafroll luteovirus similarity with a type of host gene-mediated resistance. Ann. Appl. Biol. 120, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Tavazza, R., Tavazza, M., Ordas, R. J., Ancora, G., and Benvenuto, E. (1988) Genetic transformation of potato (Solanum tuberosum) an efficient method to obtain transgenic plants. Plant Sci. 59, 175–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Sheerman, S. and Bevan, M. W. (1988) A rapid transformation method for Solanum tuberosum using binary Agrobacterium tumefaciens vectors. Plant Cell Rep. 7, 13–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Newell, C. A., Rozman, R., Hinchee, M. A., Lawson, E. C., Haley, L., Sanders, P., et al. (1991) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Russet Burbank. Plant Cell Rep. 10, 30–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Visser, R. G. F. (1991) Regeneration and transformation of potato by Agrobacterium tumefaciens, in Plant Tissue Culture Manual: Fundamentals and Applications (Lindsey, K., ed.), Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
- 11.Higgin, E. S., Hulme, J. S., and Shields, R. (1992) Early events in transformation of potato by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Sci. 82, 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Ishida, B. K., Snyder, G. W., Jr., and Belknap, R. (1989) The use of in vitro-grown microtuber discs in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Russet Burbank and Lemhi Russet potatoes. Plant Cell Rep. 8, 325–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar