The Peroxidase-Antiperoxidase (PAP) Method and Other All-Immunologic Detection Methods

  • Gary L. Bratthauer
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology™ book series (MIMB, volume 115)

Abstract

These methods have, as an underlying unification, the sole use of antibody-antigen interaction to provide the binding of reagents, ultimately leading to the localization of enzyme at the site of cellular antigen. The earlier direct and indirect techniques, while still used today, were found to be less sensitive than the later-used peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP) techniques. The newer immune complex polymer type of detection system (Envision™ Dako Corporation, Santa Barbara, CA) increases the amplification with an indirect style of reaction while still keeping the binding entirely immunologic. These techniques have been supplanted mostly by the avidin-biotin binding schema (see Chapter 25). However, there are still times when a non-avidin-biotin system is preferred. The following procedure highlights the PAP type of reaction, the most commonly used immunologic reaction method, and additional versions— direct, indirect and polymer types of procedures—are discussed at the end of the chapter.

References

  1. 1.
    Sternberger, L. (1979) Immunocytochemistry. 2nd ed. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cerio, R. and MacDonald, D. (1988) Routine diagnostic immunohistochemical labeling of extracellular antigens in formol saline solution—fixed, paraffinembedded cutaneous tissue.J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 19, 747–753.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boehringer Mannheim product insert for anti-digoxigenin-POD, Fab fragments. (1995) Boehringer Mannheim, Hanover, Germany.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dako Envision System universal kit instructions. (1994) Dako Corporation, Santa Barbara, CA.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clements, J. and Beitz, A. (1985) The effects of different pretreatment conditions and fixation regimes on serotonin immunoreactivity: a quantitative light microscopic study. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 33, 778–784.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Laitinen, L., Laitinen, A., Panula, P., Partanen, M., Tervo, K., and Tervo, T.(1983) Immunohistochemical demonstration of substance P in the lower respiratory tract of the rabbit and not of man. Thorax 38, 531–536.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hsu, S. and Soban, E. (1982) Color modification of diaminobenzidine (DAB) precipitation by metallic ions and its application for double immunohistochemistry. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 30, 1079.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ordronneau, P., Lindstrom, P., and Petrusz, P. (1981) Four unlabeled antibody bridge techniques: A comparison. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 29, 1397–1404.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary L. Bratthauer
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of ImmunopathologyArmed Forces Institute of PathologyWashington

Personalised recommendations