Advertisement

Photochemical Transfection Light-Induced, Site-Directed Gene Delivery

  • Lina Prasmickaite
  • Anders Høgset
  • Kristian Berg
Protocol
  • 606 Downloads
Part of the Methods in Molecular Medicine book series (MIMM, volume 69)

Abstract

Most nonviral gene transfection vectors deliver transfecting DNA into cells through the endocytic pathway (1,2). Poor escape from endocytic vesicles in many cases constitutes a major barrier for delivery of a functional gene, since the endocytosed transfecting DNA is unable to reach the cytosol and be further transported to the nucleus, but rather is trapped in endocytic vesicles and finally degraded in lysosomes (3). Therefore, the development of endosome-disruptive strategies is of great importance for the further progress of gene transfection. We have developed a new technology, termed photochemical internalization (PCI), to achieve light-inducible permeabilization of endocytic vesicles (4, 5, 6, 7, 8). The technology is based on photochemical reactions initiated by photosensitizers localized in endocytic vesicles and inducing rupture of these vesicles upon light exposure (4). This leads to the release of endocytosed macromolecules such as transfecting DNA from endocytic vesicles into the cytosol (Fig. 1). As a light-dependent treatment, PCI-mediated transfection (photochemical transfection) allows the possibility of directing the gene delivery to a desired site, e.g., achieving tumor-specific expression of a therapeutic gene in gene therapy in vivo.
Fig. 1.

Principle of photochemical internalization (PCI). I, endocytosis of the pho-tosensitizer (S) and the transfecting gene (G); II, localization of the photosensitizer and the transgene in the same endocytic vesicles; III, rupture of endosomal membrane upon light exposure and subsequent release of the transfecting gene into the cytosol.

Keywords

Charge Ratio Therapeutic Gene Light Dose Endocytic Vesicle Tetraphenyl Porphines 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Zabner J., Fasbender A. J., Moninger T., Poellinger K. A., and Welsh M. J. (1995) Cellular and molecular barriers to gene transfer by a cationic lipid. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 18997–19007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Friend D. S., Papahadjopoulos D., and Debs R. J. (1996) Endocytosis and intra-cellular processing accompanying transfection mediated by cationic liposomes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1278, 41–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Luo D. and Saltzman W. M. (2000) Synthetic DNA delivery systems. Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 33–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berg K., Selbo P. K., Prasmickaite L., et al. (1999) Photochemical internalization: a novel technology for delivery of macromolecules into cytosol. Cancer Res. 59, 1180–1183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hφgset A., Prasmickaite L., Tjelle T. E., and Berg K. (2000) Photochemical transfection: a new technology for light-induced, site-directed gene delivery. Hum. Gene Ther. 11, 869–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prasmickaite L., Hogset A., Tjelle T. E., et al. (2000) Role of endosomes in gene transfection mediated by photochemical internalisation (PCI). J. Gene Med. 2, 477–488.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Selbo P. K., Sivam G., Fodstad O., Sandvig K., and Berg K. (2000) Photochemical internalisation increases the cytotoxic effect of the immunotoxin MOC31-gelonin. Int. J. Cancer 87, 853–859.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Selbo P. K., Sandvig K., Kirveliene V., and Berg K. (2000) Release of gelonin from endosomes and lysosomes to cytosol by photochemical internalization. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1475, 307–313.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moan J. and Sommer S. (1985) Oxygen dependence of the photosensitizing effect of hematoporphyrin derivative in NHIK 3025 cells. Cancer Res. 45, 1608–1610.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weishaupt K. R., Gomer C. J., and Dougherty T. J. (1976) Identification of singlet oxygen as the cytotoxic agent in photoinactivation of a murine tumor. Cancer Res. 36, 2326–2329.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jori G. and Spikes J. D. (1984) Photobiochemistry of porphyrins, in Topics in Photomedicine (Smith K. C., ed.), Plenum,New York, pp. 183–318.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moan J. and Berg K. (1991) The photodegradation of porphyrins in cells can be used to estimate the lifetime of singlet oxygen. Photochem. Photobiol. 53, 549–553.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berg K. and Moan J. (1994) Lysosomes as photochemical targets. Int. J. Cancer 59, 814–822.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berg K., Western A., Bommer J. C., and Moan J. (1990) Intracellular localization of sulfonated meso-tetraphenylporphines in a human carcinoma cell line. Photochem. Photobiol. 52, 481–487.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peng Q., Nesland J. M., Madslien K., Danielsen H. E., and Moan J. (1996) Subcellular photodynamic action sites of sulfonated aluminium phthalocyanines in a human melanoma cell line. SPIE 2628, 102–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moan J., Berg K., Kvam E., et al. (1989) Intracellular localization of photosensitizers. Ciba Found. Symp. 146, 95–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moan J., Berg K., Bommer J. C., and Western A. (1992) Action spectra of phthalocyanines with respect to photo sensitization of cells. Photochem. Photobiol. 56, 171–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moan J., Berg K., Anholt H., and Madslien K. (1994) Sulfonated aluminium phthalocyanines as sensitizers for photochemotherapy. Effects of small light doses on localization, dye fluorescence and photosensitivity in V79 cells. Int. J. Cancer 58, 865–870.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maman N., Dhami S., Phillips D., and Brault D. (1999) Kinetic and equilibrium studies of incorporation of di-sulfonated aluminum phthalocyanine into unilamellar vesicles. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1420, 168–178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pass H. I. (1993) Photodynamic therapy in oncology: mechanisms and clinical use. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 85, 443–456.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Henderson B. W. and Dougherty T. J. (1992) How does photodynamic therapy work? Photochem. Photobiol. 55, 145–157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maziere J. C., Morliere P., and Santus R. (1991) The role of the low density lipoprotein receptor pathway in the delivery of lipophilic photosensitizers in the photodynamic therapy of tumours. J. Photochem. Photobiol. 8, 351–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wan S., Parrish J. A., Anderson R. R., and Madden M. (1981) Transmittance of nonionizing radiation in human tissues. Photochem. Photobiol. 34, 679–681.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bateman A., Bullough F., Murphy S., et al. (2000) Fusogenic membrane glycoproteins as a novel class of genes for the local and immune-mediated control of tumor growth. Cancer Res. 60, 1492–1497.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kianmanesh A. R., Perrin H., Panis Y., et al. (1997) A “distant” bystander effect of suicide gene therapy: regression of nontransduced tumors together with a distant transduced tumor. Hum. Gene Ther. 8, 1807–1814.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dilber M. S. and Smith C. I. (1997) Suicide genes and bystander killing: local and distant effects. Gene Ther. 4, 273–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Phelan A., Elliott G., and O’Hare P. (1998) Intercellular delivery of functional p53 by the herpesvirus protein VP22. Nat. Biotechnol. 16, 440–443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Moan J., McGhie J., and Jacobsen P. B. (1983) Photodynamic effects on cells in vitro exposed to hematoporphyrin derivative and light. Photochem. Photobiol. 37, 599–604.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Davies C. L., Ranheim T., Malik Z., Rofstad E. K., Moan J., and Lindmo T. (1988) Relationship between changes in antigen expression and protein synthesis in human melanoma cells after hyperthermia and photodynamic treatment. Br. J. Cancer 58, 306–313.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lina Prasmickaite
    • 1
  • Anders Høgset
    • 1
  • Kristian Berg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiophysicsInstitute for Cancer ResearchOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations