Advertisement

Mechanisms of Neurulation

  • Gary C. Schoenwolf
  • Jodi L. Smith
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology™ book series (MIMB, volume 136)

Abstract

The process of neurulation results in the formation of the neural tube, the rudiment of the adult central nervous system. Neurulation occurs in two phases in vertebrate embryos, called primary and secondary neurulation. Primary neurulation, the formation of the neural plate and subsequent morphogenetic movements that transform it into a neural tube, forms the entire neural tube in amphibians and reptiles. Secondary neurulation, the formation of an epithelial cord and its subsequent cavitation to form a neural tube, forms the entire neural tube in fishes. Both primary and secondary neurulations occur in birds and mammals. The brain and trunk level of the spinal cord form by primary neurulation, whereas the tail spinal cord forms by secondary neurulation. In humans, primary neurulation is the most significant phase of neurulation from a clinical perspective because this phase, when it occurs abnormally, results in open neural tube defectsserious malformations of the central nervous system (see Chapters 15 and 17, in this volume). In this chapter, we will emphasize primary neurulation because of its clinical importance and because far more is known about primary neurulation that about secondary neurulation.

Keywords

Neural Tube Neural Plate Primitive Streak Neuroepithelial Cell Hinge Point 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Schoenwolf, G. C. and Smith, J. L. (1990) Mechanisms of neurulation: traditional viewpoint and recent advances. Development 109, 243–270.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith, J. L. and Schoenwolf, G. C. (1997) Neurulation: coming to closure. Trends Neurosci. 20, 510–516.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith, J. L. and Schoenwolf, G. C. (1998) Getting organized: new insights into the organizer of higher vertebrates. Curr. Topics Dev. Biol. 40, 79–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hornbruch, A. and Wolpert, L. (1986) Positional signaling by Hensen’ s node when grafted to the chick limb bud. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 94, 257–265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dealy, C. N. (1997) Hensen’s node provides an endogenous limb-forming signal. Dev. Biol. 188, 216–223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yuan, S., Darnell, D. K., and Schoenwolf, G. C. (1995) Identification of inducing, responding, and suppressing regions in an experimental model of notochord formation in avian embryos. Dev. Biol. 172, 567–584.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zorn, A. M. (1997) Cell-cell signaling: frog frizbees. Curr. Biol. 7, R501–R504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schoenwolf, G. C. (1985) neuroepithelium: Morphometric analyses. Dev. Biol. 109, 127–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schoenwolf, G. C. (1988) Microsurgical analyses of avian neurulation: separation of medial and lateral tissues. J. Comp. Neurol. 276, 498–507.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moury, J. D. and Schoenwolf, G. C. (1995) Cooperative model of epithelial shaping and bending during avian neurulation: autonomous movements of the neural plate, autonomous movements of the epidermis, and interactions in the neural plate/epidermis transition zone. Dev. Dyn. 204, 323–337.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schoenwolf, G. C. and Alvarez, I. S. (1989) Roles of neuroepithelial cell rearrangement and division in shaping of the avian neural plate. Development 106, 427–439.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sausedo, R. A., Smith, J. L., and Schoenwolf, G. C. (1997) Role of nonrandomly oriented cell division in shaping and bending of the neural plate. J. Comp. Neurol. 381, 473–488.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Keller, R., Shih, J., Sater, A. K., and Moreno, C. (1992) Planar induction of convergence and extension of the neural plate by the organizer of Xenopus. Dev. Dyn. 193, 218–234.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Poznanski, A., Minsuk, S., Stathopoulos, D., and Keller, R. (1997) Epithelial cell wedging and neural trough formation are induced planarly in Xenopus without persistent vertical interactions with mesoderm. Dev. Biol. 189, 256–269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schoenwolf, G. C. and Smith, J. L. (1990) Epithelial cell wedging: a fundamental cell behavior contributing to hinge point formation during epithelial morphogenesis, in Control of Morphogenesis by Specific Cell Behaviors. Seminars in Developmental Biology, Vol. 1 (Keller, R. E. and Fristrom, D., eds.), W. B. Saunders, London, pp. 325–334.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Alvarez, I. S. and Schoenwolf, G. C. (1992) Expansion of surface epithelium provides the major extrinsic force for bending of the neural plate. J. Exp. Zool. 261, 340–348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hackett, D. A., Smith, J. L., and Schoenwolf, G. C. (1997) Epidermal ectoderm is required for full elevation and for convergence during bending of the avian neural plate. Dev. Dyn. 210, 397–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith, J. L. and Schoenwolf, G. C. (1989) Notochordal induction of cell wedging in the chick neural plate and its role in neural tube formation. J. Exp. Zool. 250, 49–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nagele, R. G., Bush, K. T., Kosciuk, M. C., Hunter, E. T., Steinberg, A. B., and Lee, H.-Y. (1989) Intrinsic and extrinsic factors collaborate to generate driving forces for neural tube formation in the chick: A study using morphometry and computerized three-dimensional reconstruction. Dev. Brain Res. 50, 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smith, J. L. and Schoenwolf, G. C. (1988) Role of cell-cycle in regulating neuroepithelial cell shape during bending of the chick neural plate. Cell Tissue Res. 252, 491–500.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schoenwolf, G. C. and Alvarez, I. S. (1991) Specification of neurepithelium and surface epithelium in avian transplantation chimeras. Development 112, 713–722.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sadler, T. W. (1978) Distribution of surface coat material on fusing neural folds of mouse embryos during neurulation. Anat. Rec. 191, 345–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Van Allen, M. I., Kalousek, D. K., Chernoff, G. F., Juriloff, D., Harris, M., McGillivray, B. C., Yong, S.-L., Langlois, S., MacLeod, P. M., Chitayat, D., Friedman, J. M., Wilson, R. D., McFadden, D., Pantzar, J., Ritchie, S., and Hall, J. G. (1993) Evidence for multisite closure of the neural tube in humans. Am. J. Med. Genet. 47, 723–743.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Straaten van, H. W. M., Jaskoll, T., Rousseau, A. M. J., Terwindt-Rouwenhorst, E. A. W., Greenberg, G., Shankar, K., and Melnick, M. (1993) Raphe of the posterior neural tube in the chick embryo: Its closure and reopening as studied in living embryos with a high definition light microscope. Dev. Dyn. 198, 65–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schoenwolf, G. C. and DeLongo, J. (1980) Ultrastructure of secondary neurulation in the chick embryo. Am. J. Anat. 158, 43–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schoenwolf, G. C. (1977) Tail (end) bud contributions to the posterior region of the chick embryo. J. Exp. Zool. 201, 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schoenwolf, G. C. (1984) Histological and ultrastructural studies of secondary neurulation in mouse embryos. Am. J. Anat. 169, 361–376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Criley, B. B. (1969) Analysis of the embryonic sources and mechanisms of development of posterior levels of chick neural tubes. J. Morphol. 128, 465–501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schoenwolf, G. C. (1979) Histological and ultrastructural observations of tail bud formation in the chick embryo. Anat. Rec. 193, 131–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schoenwolf, G. C. (1978) Effects of complete tail bud extirpation on early development of the posterior region of the chick embryo. Anat. Rec. 192, 289–296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schoenwolf, G. C., Chandler, N. B., and Smith, J. (1985) Analysis of the origins and early fates of neural crest cells in caudal regions of avian embryos. Dev. Biol. 110, 467–479.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Griffith, C. M. and Wiley, M. J. (1989) Distribution of cell surface glycoconjugates during mouse secondary neurulation. Anat. Embryol. 180, 567–575.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Griffith, C. M. and Wiley, M. J. (1990) Distribution of glycoconjugates during chick secondary neurulation. Anat. Rec. 226, 81–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Placzek, M. and Furley, A. (1996). Neural development: patterning cascades in the neural tube. Curr. Biol. 6, 526–529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sasai, Y. and Robertis, E. M. D. (1997) Ectodermal patterning in vertebrate embryos. Dev. Biol. 182, 5–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary C. Schoenwolf
    • 1
  • Jodi L. Smith
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Neurobiology and AnatomyUniversity of Utah School of MedicineSalt Lake City
  2. 2.Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity of Utah Medical Center

Personalised recommendations