Advertisement

Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis

  • John Maule
Protocol
Part of the Springer Protocols Handbooks book series (SPH)

Abstract

DNA undergoing electrophoresis in agarose assumes a conformation that only permits the movement of molecules up to about 20 kb in size. Beyond this limit, mobility rapidly decreases as the molecules become trapped in the agarose matrix. A reduction in agarose concentration to 0.5% and the application of a reduced voltage permits the resolution to be increased to a least 50 kb (1), but gels of this concentration and less are too fragile and difficult to manipulate and run times become excessively long. Since the introduction of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) in 1983 (2), this technique has been used to separate molecules as large as 12 Mb (3). The technique relies on a direct current (D.C.) electric field that periodically changes direction and/or intensity relative to the agarose gel. The time interval during which the field is in any one direction is called the pulse time, and its duration is the single most important factor in determining the molecular size range over which separation is possible. In simplistic terms, large DNA molecules are able to migrate through the agarose matrix by zigzagging in response to changes in the electric field and this process has been confirmed by direct visualization (4, 5, 6). Short pulse times, resulting in rapid changes in field direction, allow smaller molecules to migrate, whereas larger molecules cannot respond quickly enough and become trapped in the matrix. As the pulse time is increased, progressively larger molecules are able to migrate, but the resolution of smaller molecules is decreased. The size window of separation is influenced primarily by the choice of pulse time.

Keywords

Pulse Time Standard Saline Citrate Yeast Peptone Dextrose Agarose Plug Lithium Dodecyl Sulfate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Fangman, W. (1978) Separation of very large DNA molecules by gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res. 5, 653–665.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schwartz, D. C., Saffran, W., Welsh, J., Haas, R., Goldenburg, M., and Cantor, C. R. (1983) New techniques for purifying large DNAs and studying their properties and packaging. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 47, 189–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Orbach, M. J., Vollrath, D., Davis, W., and Yanofsky, C. (1988) An electrophoretic karyotype of Neurospora crassa. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 1469–1473.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gurrieri, S., Rizzarelli, E., Beach, D., and Bustamante, C. (1990) Imaging of kinked configurations of DNA molecules undergoing orthogonal field alternating gel electrophoresis by fluorescence microscopy. Biochemistry 29, 3396–3401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bustamante, C. Gurrieri, S., and Smith, S. B. (1990) Observation of single DNA molecules during pulsed field gel electrophoresis by fluorescence microscopy. Methods 1, 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gurrieri, S., Smith, S. B., Wells, K. S., Johnson, I. D., and Bustamante, C. (1996) Realtime imaging of the reorientation mechanisms of YOYO-labelled DNA molecules during 90° and 120° pulsed field gel electrophoresis Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 4759–4767.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maule, J. C. (1994) Electrophoretic karyotype analysis-pulsed field gel electrophoresis, in Chromosome Analysis Protocols (Gosden, J. R., ed.), Humana, Totowa, NJ, pp. 221–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maule, J. C. (1998) Pulsed field gel electrophoresis. Molecular Biotechnology 9, 107–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Burke, D. T., Carle, G. F., and Olson, M. V. (1987) Cloning of large segments of exogenous DNA into yeast by means of artificial chromosome vectors. Science 236, 806–812.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Monaco, A. P. and Larin Z. (1994) YACs, BACs, PACs and MACs: artificial chromosomes as research tools. Trends Biotech. 12, 280–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bickmore, W. A. and Bird, A. P. (1992) Use of restriction enzymes to detect and isolate genes from mammalian cells. Methods Enzymol. 216, 224–245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arker, W., Enquist, L., Hohn, B., Murray, N. E., and Murray, K. (1983) Experimental methods for use with lambda, in Lambda II (Hendrix, R. W., ed.) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, pp. 433–466.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maule, J. C. and Green, D. K. (1990) Semiconductor-controlled contour-clamped homogeneous electric field apparatus. Anal. Biochem. 191, 390–395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jones, C. P., Janson, M., and Nordenskjold, M. (1989) Separation of yeast chromosomes in the megabase range suitable as size markers for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Technique 1, 90–95.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Porteous, D. J. and Maule, J. C. (1990) Casting multiple aliquots of agarose embedded cells for PFGE analysis. Trends Genet. 6, 346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chu, G., Vollrath, D., and Davis, R. W. (1986) Separation of large DNA molecules by contour-clamped homogeneous electric fields. Science 234, 1582–1585.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guido, E. C. and Abhay, K. (1994) Simple method to reduce background on autoradiographs. BioTechniques 17, 294.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Albertsen, H. M., Paslier, D. Le, Abderrahim, H., Dausset, J., Cann, H., and Cohen, D. (1989) Improved control of partial DNA restriction enzyme digest in agarose using limiting concentrations of Mg++ Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 808.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barlow, D. P. and Lehrach, H. (1990) Partial Not1 digests, generated by low enzyme concentration or the presence of ethidium bromide, can be used to extend the range of pulsed-field gel mapping. Technique 2, 79–87.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wilson, W. W. and Hoffman, R. M. (1990) Methylation of intact chromosomes by bacterial methylases in agarose plugs suitable for pulsed field electrophoresis. Anal. Biochem. 191, 370–375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Topal, M. D., Thresher, R. J., Conrad, M., and Griffith, J. (1991) Nael endonuclease binding to pBR322 DNA induces looping. Biochemistry 30, 2006–2010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maule, J. C. (1995) Colored microparticles for clear visualization of agarose beads and plugs. Trends Genet. 11, 127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Werner, E., Holder, A. A., and Hoheisel, J. D. (1997) Growth and storage of YAC clones in Hogness freezing medium. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 1467–1468.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Carle, G. F. and Olson, M. V. (1985) An electrophoretic karyotype for yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82, 3756–3760.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Smith, C. L., Klco, S. R., and Cantor, C. R. (1988) Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and the technology of large DNA molecules, in Genome Analysis (Davies, K. E., ed.) IRL, Oxford, pp. 41–71.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mathew, M. K., Smith, C. L., and Cantor, C. R. (1988) High-resolution separation and accurate size determination in pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: DNA size standards and the effect of agarose and temperature. Biochemistry 27, 9204–9210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    New England Biolabs Catalog (1998/99), Beverly, MA, p. 257.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    White, H. W. (1992) Rapid separation of DNA molecules by agarose gel electrophoresis: use of a new agarose matrix and a survey of running buffer effects. Bio Techniques 12, 574–579.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Birren, B. W., Lai, E., Clark, S. M., Hood, L., and Simon, M. I. (1988) Optimized conditions for pulsed field gel electrophoretic separations of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 7563–7582.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Birren, B. W., Hood, L., and Lai, E. (1989) Pulsed field gel electrophoresis studies of DNA migration made with the PACE electrophoresis system. Electrophoresis 10, 302–309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vollrath, D. and Davis, R. W. (1987) Resolution of DNA molecules greater than 5 mega-bases by contour-clamped homogeneous electric fields. Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 7865–7876.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gunderson, K. and Chu, G. (1991) Pulsed-field electrophoresis of megabase-sized DNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 3348–3354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Smith, D. R. (1990) Genomic long-range restriction mapping. Methods 1, 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Reed, K. C. and Mann, D. A. (1985) Rapid transfer of DNA from agarose gels to nylon membranes. Nucleic Acids Res. 13, 7207–7221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chikashige, Y., Kinoshita, N., Nakaseko, Y., Matsumoto, T., Murakami, S., Niwa, O., and Yanagida, M. (1989) Composite motifs and repeat symmetry in S. pombe centromeres. Cell 57, 739–751.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stoye, J. P., Frankel, W. N., and Coffin, J. M. (1991) DNA hybridization in dried gels with fragmented probes: an improvement over blotting techniques. Technique 3, 123–128.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Maule
    • 1
  1. 1.MRC Human Genetics Unit, Molecular Genetics SectionWestern General HospitalEdinburghScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations