Advertisement

FRET and BRET-Based Biosensors in Live Cell Compound Screens

  • Katie Herbst Robinson
  • Jessica R. Yang
  • Jin Zhang
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1071)

Abstract

Live cell compound screening with genetically encoded fluorescence or bioluminescence-based biosensors offers a potentially powerful approach to identify novel regulators of a signaling event of interest. In particular, compound screening in living cells has the added benefit that the entire signaling network remains intact, and thus the screen is not just against a single molecule of interest but against any molecule within the signaling network that may modulate the distinct signaling event reported by the biosensor in use. Furthermore, only molecules that are cell permeable or act at cell surface receptors will be identified as “hits,” thus reducing further optimization of the compound in terms of cell penetration. Here we discuss a detailed protocol for using genetically encoded biosensors in living cells in a 96-well format for the execution of high throughput compound screens and the identification of small molecules which modulate a signaling event of interest.

Key words

Live cell compound screening Genetically encoded biosensor Cell signaling Fluorescence resonance energy transfer Bioluminescence 

References

  1. 1.
    Inglese J, Johnson RL, Simeonov A, Xia M, Zheng W, Austin CP, Auld DS (2007) High-throughput screening assays for the identification of chemical probes. Nat Chem Biol 3(8):466–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Herzberg RP (2009) Design and implementation of high-throughput screening assay. Methods Mol Biol 565:1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mayr L, Bojanic D (2009) Novel trends in high-throughput screening. Curr Opin Pharmacol 9(5):580–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang JH, Chung TDY, Olderburg KR (1999) A simple statistical parameter for use in evaluation and validation of high throughput screening assays. J Biomol Screen 4(2)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Allen MD, DiPilato LM, Rahdar M, Ren YR, Chong C, Liu JO, Zhang J (2006) Reading dynamic kinase activity in living cells for high-throughput screening. ACS Chem Biol 1(6):371–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ni Q, Titov DV, Zhang J (2006) Analyzing protein kinase dynamics in living cells with FRET reporters. Methods 40(3):279–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Adjobo-Hermans MJW, Goedhar J, van Weeren L, Nijmeijer S, Manders EMM, Offermanns S, Gadella TWJ (2011) Real-time visualization of heterotrimeric G protein Gq activation in living cells. BMC Biol 9(1):32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tasken K, Aandahl EM (2004) Localized effects of cAMP mediated by distinct routes of protein kinase. Physiol Rev 84:137–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Williams C (2004) cAMP detection methods in HTS: selecting the best from the rest. Nat Rev Drug Discov 3:125–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang J, Hupfeld CJ, Taylor SS, Olefsky JM, Tsien RY (2005) Insulin disrupts beta-adrenergic signalling to protein kinase A in adipocytes. Nature 437:569–573PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tian H, Ip L, Luo H, Chang DC, Luo KQ (2007) Br J Pharm 150(3):321–324Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thomsen W, Frazer J, Unett D (2005) Functional assays for screening GPCR targets. Curr Opin Biotechnol 16(6):655–665PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jiang LI, Collins J, Davis R, Lin KM, DeCamp D, Roach T, Hsueh R, Rebres RA, Ross EM, Taussig R, Fraser I, Sternweis PC (2007) Use of a cAMP BRET sensor to characterize a novel regulation of cAMP by the sphingosine 1-phosphate/G13 pathway. J Biol Chem 282(14):10576Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boute N, Jockers R, Issad T (2002) The use of resonance energy transfer in high-throughput screening: BRET versus FRET. Trends Pharmacol Sci 23(8):351–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fan F, Binkowski BF, Butler BL, Stecha PF, Lewis MK, Wood KV (2008) Novel genetically encoded biosensors using firefly luciferase. ACS Chem Biol 3(6):346–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fan F, Wood KV (2007) Bioluminescent assays for high-throughput screening. Assay Drug Dev Technol 5(1):127–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Depry C, Allen MD, Zhang J (2011) Visualization of PKA activity in plasma membrane microdomains. Mol Biosyst 7:52–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Herbst KJ, Allen MD, Zhang J (2011) Luminescent kinase activity biosensors based on a versatile bimolecular switch. J Am Chem Soc 133(15):5676–5679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Herbst KJ, Allen MD, Zhang J (2009) The cAMP-dependent protein kinase inhibitor H-89 attenuates the bioluminescence signal produced by Renilla luciferase. PLoS One 4(5)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thorne N, Inglese J, Auld DS (2010) Illuminating insights into firefly luciferase and other bioluminescent reporters used in chemical biology. Chem Biol 17(6):646–657PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katie Herbst Robinson
    • 1
  • Jessica R. Yang
    • 1
  • Jin Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pharmacology and Molecular SciencesThe Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations