Advertisement

Ovarian Cancer pp 393-408 | Cite as

In Vitro Model of Spontaneous Mouse OSE Transformation

Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1049)

Abstract

An in vitro syngeneic model of neoplastic progression of murine ovarian surface epithelial (MOSE) cells represents a valid and significant model that allows for investigations into early mechanisms that impact tumorigenesis. Importantly, MOSE cells representing different stages of neoplastic transformation can be implanted back into immunocompetent mice to investigate host microenvironmental interactions that impact peritoneal dissemination and suppress immune surveillance mechanisms. Here we describe the isolation of MOSE cells that undergo spontaneous transformation upon repeated passage in cell culture. We also provide detailed in vitro assays for 3-D culturing of MOSE cells for characterizing anchorage-independent and invasive growth properties of these cells. Cell lines derived from this model have provided numerous insights into genetic, epigenetic, and biomechanical changes associated with neoplastic progression, as well as the immune responses associated with peritoneal dissemination of ovarian cancer cells.

Key words

Mouse ovarian surface epithelial cells (MOSE) Neoplastic progression model Organotypic culture 3-D spheroid culture Immunofluorescence microscopy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NIH grant CA118846 (E.M.S., P.C.R.) and The Fralin Research Institute Initiative for Cancer Biology at Virginia Tech (P.C.R., E.M.S.).

References

  1. 1.
    Howlader N et al (2011) SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2008, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2008/
  2. 2.
    Jemal A et al (2010) Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 60:277–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW (1993) The multistep nature of cancer. Trends Genet 9:138–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kuk C et al (2009) Mining the ovarian cancer ascites proteome for potential ovarian cancer biomarkers. Mol Cell Proteomics 8:661–669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shield K et al (2009) Multicellular spheroids in ovarian cancer metastases: biology and pathology. Gynecol Oncol 113:143–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steinberg JJ, Demopoulos RI, Bigelow B (1986) The evaluation of the omentum in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 24:327–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nishida T et al (1986) Histologic origin of rat ovarian cancer induced by direct application of 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene. Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi 38:570–574PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen KM et al (2012) Induction of ovarian cancer and DNA adducts by dibenzo[a, l]pyrene in the mouse. Chem Res Toxicol 25:374–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Flesken-Nikitin A et al (2003) Induction of carcinogenesis by concurrent inactivation of p53 and Rb1 in the mouse ovarian surface epithelium. Cancer Res 63:3459–3463PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Connolly DC et al (2003) Female mice chimeric for expression of the simian virus 40 TAg under control of the MISIIR promoter develop epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 63:1389–1397PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim J et al (2012) High-grade serous ovarian cancer arises from fallopian tube in a mouse model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:3921–3926PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gregoire L et al (2001) Spontaneous malignant transformation of human ovarian surface epithelial cells in vitro. Clin Cancer Res 7:4280–4287PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maines-Bandiera SL, Kruk PA, Auersperg N (1992) Simian virus 40-transformed human ovarian surface epithelial cells escape normal growth controls but retain morphogenetic responses to extracellular matrix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 16:729–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nitta M et al (2001) Characterization and tumorigenicity of human ovarian surface epithelial cells immortalized by SV40 large T antigen. Gynecol Oncol 81:10–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leung EH, Leung PC, Auersperg N (2001) Differentiation and growth potential of human ovarian surface epithelial cells expressing temperature-sensitive SV40 T antigen. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 37:515–521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu J et al (2004) A genetically defined model for human ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 64:1655–1663PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Adams AT, Auersperg N (1981) Transformation of cultured rat ovarian surface epithelial cells by Kirsten murine sarcoma virus. Cancer Res 41:2063–2072PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bono Y et al (2012) Creation of immortalised epithelial cells from ovarian endometrioma. Br J Cancer 106:1205–1213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Motohara T et al (2011) Transient depletion of p53 followed by transduction of c-Myc and K-Ras converts ovarian stem-like cells into tumor-initiating cells. Carcinogenesis 32:1597–1606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guo X et al (2011) Overexpression of the beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin promotes the transformation of human ovarian epithelial cells and ovarian tumorigenesis. Am J Pathol 179:1385–1393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roberts PC et al (2005) Sequential molecular and cellular events during neoplastic progression: a mouse syngeneic ovarian cancer model. Neoplasia 7:944–956PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Creekmore AL et al (2011) Changes in gene expression and cellular architecture in an ovarian cancer progression model. PLoS One 6:e17676PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee JM et al (2006) The epithelial-mesenchymal transition: new insights in signaling, development, and disease. J Cell Biol 172:973–981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ketene AN et al (2012) The effects of cancer progression on the viscoelasticity of ovarian cell cytoskeleton structures. Nanomedicine 8:93–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ketene AN et al (2012) Actin filaments play primary role for structural integrity and viscoelastic response in cells. Integr Biol 4:540–549. doi  10.1039/C2IB00168C Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roby KF et al (2000) Development of a syngeneic mouse model for events related to ovarian cancer. Carcinogenesis 21:585–591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bak SP et al (2008) Murine ovarian cancer vascular leukocytes require arginase-1 activity for T cell suppression. Mol Immunol 46:258–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hagemann T et al (2008) “Re-educating” tumor-associated macrophages by targeting NF-kappaB. J Exp Med 205:1261–1268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hagemann T et al (2006) Ovarian cancer cells polarize macrophages toward a tumor-associated phenotype. J Immunol 176:5023–5032PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Huarte E et al (2008) Depletion of dendritic cells delays ovarian cancer progression by boosting antitumor immunity. Cancer Res 68:7684–7691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tomihara K et al (2010) Antigen-specific immunity and cross-priming by epithelial ovarian carcinoma-induced CD11b(+)Gr-1(+) cells. J Immunol 184:6151–6160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang L et al (2002) Generation of a syngeneic mouse model to study the effects of vascular endothelial growth factor in ovarian carcinoma. Am J Pathol 161:2295–2309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biomedical Sciences and PathobiologyVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA
  2. 2.Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and ExerciseVirginia TechBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations