A Corneal Scarring Model

  • Daniel J. Gibson
  • Gregory S. Schultz
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1037)

Abstract

Corneal opacification (i.e., haze) following a non-denaturing acute injury to the cornea is a process which takes about 5 days to manifest itself, indicating that it is the consequence of cellular and molecular biological processes. In order to obtain a better understanding of the haze development process, and to test candidate anti-haze therapies, we use a corneal scarring model whereby we create an excimer laser wound in the center of rabbit corneas. The primary data generated by this model are (1) changes in corneal thickness with time; (2) wound closure rates, or re-epithelialization; (3) changes in the location and density of corneal sub-epithelial haze; and (4) molecular and histological changes leading up to, during, and following the formation of haze.

While the use of excimer lasers to generate consistent wounds in rabbit corneas is not a novel protocol for the study of corneal haze, the photographic technique presented here for the more objective recording and quantification of corneal haze is. At present, a qualitative, semiquantitative, grading system is employed whereby the amount of iris detail discernible through the scar is assigned a value between 0 and 4. Such a system makes direct comparisons amongst reported anti-haze trials nearly impossible. Furthermore, the additional “geographic” detail provided by the image provides a new layer of information about the formation of haze and the ability to troubleshoot dosing regimens. Altogether, with the information present herein, we believe that the study of corneal haze formation and the ability to compare and contrast candidate therapies are both greatly improved.

Key words

Cornea Haze Fibrosis Model Excimer Refractive surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    Moller-Pedersen T (2004) Keratocyte reflectivity and corneal haze. Exp Eye Res 78:553PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dawson DG et al (2005) Ex vivo confocal microscopy of human LASIK corneas with histologic and ultrastructural correlation. Ophthalmology 112:634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sridhar MS, Rapuano CJ, Cosar CB, Cohen EJ, Laibson PR (2002) Phototherapeutic keratectomy versus diamond burr polishing of Bowman’s membrane in the treatment of recurrent corneal erosions associated with anterior basement membrane dystrophy. Ophthalmology 109:674PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reidy JJ et al (1996) Comparison of corneal epithelial wound healing after photorefractive and lamellar keratectomy. J Refract Surg 12:352PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tuft SJ, Zabel RW, Marshall J (1989) Corneal repair following keratectomy. A comparison between conventional surgery and laser photoablation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30:1769PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Szerenyi KD, Campos M, McDonnell PJ (1994) Prostaglandin E2 production after lamellar keratectomy and photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Corneal Surg 10:413PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bokosky JE, Meyer RF, Sugar A (1985) Surgical treatment of calcific band keratopathy. Ophthalmic Surg 16:645PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lance SE, Capone A Jr, SundarRaj N, Roat MI, Thoft RA (1988) Diamond burring and surgical keratectomy. Morphologic comparison in the rabbit. Arch Ophthalmol 106:830PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Malta JB, Soong HK (2008) Diamond burr superficial keratectomy in the treatment of visually-significant anterior corneal lesions. Arq Bras Oftalmol 71:415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ramamurthi S, Rahman MQ, Dutton GN, Ramaesh K (2006) Pathogenesis, clinical features and management of recurrent corneal erosions. Eye (Lond) 20:635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schipper I (2003) Diamond burr polishing. Ophthalmology 110:1855, author reply 1855PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Soong HK, Farjo Q, Meyer RF, Sugar A (2002) Diamond burr superficial keratectomy for recurrent corneal erosions. Br J Ophthalmol 86:296PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tzelikis PF, Rapuano CJ, Hammersmith KM, Laibson PR, Cohen EJ (2005) Diamond burr treatment of poor vision from anterior basement membrane dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol 140:308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wong VW, Chi SC, Lam DS (2009) Diamond burr polishing for recurrent corneal erosions: results from a prospective randomized controlled trial. Cornea 28:152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel J. Gibson
    • 1
  • Gregory S. Schultz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute for Wound ResearchUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations