Advertisement

iTRAQ-Labeling for Biomarker Discovery

  • Leroi V. DeSouza
  • Sébastien N. Voisin
  • K. W. Michael Siu
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1002)

Abstract

Various mass-tagging approaches have been developed over the last few years that have enabled mass spectrometry-based relative and absolute quantification of proteins from complex samples. This, in turn, has facilitated proteomics research to address issues ranging from alterations in the proteome of various model systems in response to various stimuli to biomarker discovery studies. Here we describe the use of one such mass-tagging approach, viz., iTRAQ labeling, as applied to cancer biomarker discovery. When applied to a cohort of tens of clinical samples, this technology can provide useful leads that serve as a basis for a more targeted validation-scale study.

Key words

iTRAQ-labeling LC-MS/MS analysis Trypsin digestion Relative quantification Strong cation exchange Reversed phase Mass-tagging Biomarker discovery 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research for funding research that enabled the development and application of the iTRAQ technology. We also acknowledge the collaboration of our biomedical and clinical colleagues, especially Terence J. Colgan, Ranju Ralhan, Ian J. Witterick, Christina M. MacMillan, and Iona T. Leong (Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto); Alexander D. Romaschin and George M. Yousef (St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto); and the late Abhijit Guha and Gelareh Zadeh (Hospital for Sick Children and Western Hospital, Toronto).

References

  1. 1.
    Ong S-E, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I et al (2002) Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 1:376–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yao X, Freas A, Ramirez J, Demirev PA, Fenselau C (2001) Proteolytic 18O labeling for comparative proteomics: model studies with two serotypes of adenovirus. Anal Chem 73:2836–2842PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA, Turecek F, Gelb MH, Aebersold R (1999) Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope coded affinity tags. Nat Biotechnol 17:994–999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN et al (2004) Multiplexed protein quantitation in saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol Cell Proteomics 3: 1154–1169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elliot MH, Smith DS, Parker CE, Borchers C (2009) Current trends in quantitative ­proteomics. J Mass Spectrom 44:1637–1660Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leroi V. DeSouza
    • 1
  • Sébastien N. Voisin
    • 1
  • K. W. Michael Siu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations