Studying Recombination in Mouse Oocytes

  • Xianfei Sun
  • Paula E. CohenEmail author
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 957)


Meiosis is the specialized cell division in sexually reproducing organisms in which haploid gametes are produced. Meiotic prophase I is the defining stage of meiosis, when pairing and synapsis occur between homologous chromosomes, concurrent with reciprocal recombination (or crossing over) events that arise between them. Any disruption of these events during prophase I can lead to improper segregation of homologous chromosomes which can cause severe birth defects in the resulting progeny, and this occurs with alarming frequency in human oocytes. Thus, while the pathways that regulate these events in prophase I are highly conserved in both males and females, the stringency with which these events are monitored and/or controlled appears to be dramatically lower in females. These observations underscore the need to examine and compare meiotic mechanisms across the sexes. However, the study of female meiosis is impeded by the early start of meiosis during fetal development and the very limited amount of ovarian tissue available for meiotic analyses. Here we describe three different techniques which are useful for meiotic prophase I analysis in mouse/human oocytes, ranging from early prophase I events through until the resolution of crossing over at the first and second meiotic divisions.

Key words

Meiosis Meiotic prophase I Chromosome spreading Chiasmata preparation Spindle preparation Oocyte 



This work was supported by funding from the NICHD to P.E.C. (HD041012) and by a student fellowship from the Cornell Center for Vertebrate Genomics to X.S. We thank members of the Cohen lab for their helpful comments and suggestions during the preparation of this manuscript.


  1. 1.
    Hassold T, Hunt P (2001) To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat Rev Genet 2:280–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hunt PA, Hassold TJ (2008) Human female meiosis: what makes a good egg go bad? Trends Genet 24:86–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Page SL, Hawley RS (2004) The genetics and molecular biology of the synaptonemal complex. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 20:525–558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morelli MA, Cohen PE (2005) Not all germ cells are created equal: aspects of sexual dimorphism in mammalian meiosis. Reproduction 130:761–781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hassold T, Hall H, Hunt P (2007) The origin of human aneuploidy: where we have been, where we are going. Hum Mol Genet 16 Spec No. 2: R203–R208Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cohen PE, Holloway JK (2010) Predicting gene networks in human oocyte meiosis. Biol Reprod 82:469–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hulten MA, Patel S, Jonasson J, Iwarsson E (2010) On the origin of the maternal age effect in trisomy 21 Down syndrome: the Oocyte Mosaicism Selection model. Reproduction 139:1–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lenzi ML, Smith J, Snowden T, Kim M, Fishel R, Poulos BK, Cohen PE (2005) Extreme heterogeneity in the molecular events leading to the establishment of chiasmata during meiosis I in human oocytes. Am J Hum Genet 76:112–127PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yuan L, Liu JG, Zhao J, Brundell E, Daneholt B, Hoog C (2000) The murine SCP3 gene is required for synaptonemal complex assembly, chromosome synapsis, and male fertility. Mol Cell 5:73–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yuan L, Liu JG, Hoja MR, Wilbertz J, Nordqvist K, Hoog C (2002) Female germ cell aneuploidy and embryo death in mice lacking the meiosis-specific protein SCP3. Science 296:1115–1118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hamer G, Novak I, Kouznetsova A, Hoog C (2008) Disruption of pairing and synapsis of chromosomes causes stage-specific apoptosis of male meiotic cells. Theriogenology 69:333–339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pelttari J, Hoja MR, Yuan L, Liu JG, Brundell E, Moens P, Santucci-Darmanin S, Jessberger R, Barbero JL, Heyting C, Hoog C (2001) A meiotic chromosomal core consisting of cohesin complex proteins recruits DNA recombination proteins and promotes synapsis in the absence of an axial element in mammalian meiotic cells. Mol Cell Biol 21:5667–5677PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Borum K (1961) Oogenesis in the mouse. Exp Cell Res 24:495–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Evans CW, Robb DI, Tuckett F, Chanlloner S (1982) Regulation of meiosis in the foetal mouse gonad. J Embryol Exp Morphol 68:59–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kan R, Sun X, Kolas NK, Avdievich E, Kneitz B, Edelmann W, Cohen PE (2008) Comparative analysis of meiotic progression in female mice bearing mutations in genes of the DNA mismatch repair pathway. Biol Reprod 78:462–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kolas NK, Svetlanov A, Lenzi ML, Macaluso FP, Lipkin SM, Liskay RM, Greally J, Edelmann W, Cohen PE (2005) Localization of MMR proteins on meiotic chromosomes in mice indicates distinct functions during prophase I. J Cell Biol 171:447–458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wojtasz L, Daniel K, Roig I, Bolcun-Filas E, Xu H, Boonsanay V, Eckmann CR, Cooke HJ, Jasin M, Keeney S, McKay MJ, Toth A (2009) Mouse HORMAD1 and HORMAD2, two conserved meiotic chromosomal proteins, are depleted from synapsed chromosome axes with the help of TRIP13 AAA-ATPase. PLoS Genet 5:e1000702PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bolcun-Filas E, Bannister LA, Barash A, Schimenti KJ, Hartford SA, Eppig JJ, Handel MA, Shen L, Schimenti JC (2011) A-MYB (MYBL1) transcription factor is a master regulator of male meiosis. Development 138:3319–3330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Williams DL, Lafferty DA, Webb SL (1970) An air drying method for the preparation of dictyotene chromosomes from ovaries of Chinese hamsters. Stain Technol 45:133–135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tarkowski AK (1966) An air-drying method for chromosome preparations from mouse eggs. Cytogenetics 5:394–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Woods LM, Hodges CA, Baart E, Baker SM, Liskay RM, Hunt PA (1999) Chromosomal influence on meiotic spindle assembly: abnormal meiosis I in female Mlh1 mutant mice. J Cell Biol 145:1395–1406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biomedical SciencesCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations