Advertisement

Future Directions of Electron Crystallography

  • Yoshinori Fujiyoshi
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 955)

Abstract

In biological science, there are still many interesting and fundamental yet difficult questions, such as those in neuroscience, remaining to be answered. Structural and functional studies of membrane proteins, which are key molecules of signal transduction in neural and other cells, are essential for understanding the molecular mechanisms of many fundamental biological processes. Technological and instrumental advancements of electron microscopy have facilitated comprehension of structural studies of biological components, such as membrane proteins. While X-ray crystallography has been the main method of structure analysis of proteins including membrane proteins, electron crystallography is now an established technique to analyze structures of membrane proteins in the lipid bilayer, which is close to their natural biological environment. By utilizing cryo-electron microscopes with helium-cooled specimen stages, structures of membrane proteins were analyzed at a resolution better than 3 Å. Such high-resolution structural analysis of membrane proteins by electron crystallography opens up the new research field of structural physiology. Considering the fact that the structures of integral membrane proteins in their native membrane environment without artifacts from crystal contacts are critical in understanding their physiological functions, electron crystallography will continue to be an important technology for structural analysis. In this chapter, I will present several examples to highlight important advantages and to suggest future directions of this technique.

Key words

Structural physiology Native membrane environment Physiologically relevant structural information Charge status analysis 2D crystal contacts Physiological lipid and ionic setting Helium-cooled specimen stage Experimental phase data 

Notes

Acknowledgments

These studies were performed in nice collaboration with many researchers whose names were recorded as authors in each referenced paper and I appreciate the contribution by each researcher. This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S) and the Japan New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO).

References

  1. 1.
    Henderson R, Unwin PN (1975) Three-dimensional model of purple membrane obtained by electron microscopy. Nature 257:28–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Henderson R, Baldwin JM, Ceska TA, Zemlin F, Beckmann E, Downing KH (1990) Model for the structure of bacteriorhodopsin based on high-resolution electron cryo-microscopy. J Mol Biol 213:899–929PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fujiyoshi Y (1998) The structural study of membrane proteins by electron crystallography. Adv Biophys 35:25–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kimura Y, Vassylyev DG, Miyazawa A, Kidera A, Matsushima M, Mitsuoka K, Murata K, Hirai T, Fujiyoshi Y (1997) Surface of bacteriorhodopsin revealed by high-resolution electron crystallography. Nature 389:206–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Unwin N (1995) Acetylcholine receptor channel imaged in the open state. Nature 373:37–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Preston GM, Carroll TP, Guggino WB, Agre P (1992) Appearance of water channels in Xenopus oocytes expressing red cell CHIP28 protein. Science 256:385–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Murata K, Mitsuoka K, Hirai T, Walz T, Agre P, Heymann JB, Engel A, Fujiyoshi Y (2000) Structural determinants of water permeation through aquaporin-1. Nature 407:599–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hiroaki Y, Tani K, Kamegawa A, Gyobu N, Nishikawa K, Suzuki H, Walz T, Sasaki S, Mitsuoka K, Kimura K, Mizoguchi A, Fujiyoshi Y (2006) Implications of the aquaporin-4 structure on array formation and cell adhesion. J Mol Biol 355:628–639PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gyobu N, Tani K, Hiroaki Y, Kmegawa A, Mitsuoka K, Fujiyoshi Y (2004) Improved specimen preparation for cryo-electron microscopy using a symmetric carbon sandwich technique. J Struct Biol 146:325–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chapman HN et al (2011) Femtosecond X-ray protein nanocrystallography. Nature 470:73–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tani K, Mitsuma T, Hiroaki Y, Kamegawa A, Nishikawa K, Tanimura Y, Fujiyoshi Y (2009) Mechanism of aquaporin-4’s fast and highly selective water conduction and proton exclusion. J Mol Biol 389(4):694–706PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ho JD, Yeh R, Sandstrom A, Chorny I, Harries WEC, Robbins RA, Miercke LJW, Stroud RM (2009) Crystal structure of human aquaporin 4 at 1.8 Å and its mechanism of conductance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:7437–7442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gonen T, Cheng Y, Sliz P, Hiroaki Y, Fujiyoshi Y, Harrison SC, Walz T (2005) Aquaporin-0 membrane junctions reveal the structure of a closed water pore. Nature 438:633–638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rash JE, Yasumura T, Hudson CS, Agre P, Nielsen S (1998) Direct immunogold labeling of aquaporin-4 in square arrays of astrocyte and ependymocyte plasma membranes in rat brain and spinal cord. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:11981–11986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Furman CS, Gorelick-Feldman DA, Davidson KG, Yasumura T, Neely JD, Agre P, Rush JE (2003) Aquaporin-4 square array assembly: opposing actions of M1 and M23 isoforms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 13609–13614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mitsuma T, Tani K, Hiroaki Y, Kamegawa A, Suzuki H, Hibino H, Kurachi Y, Fujiyoshi Y (2010) Influence of the cytoplasmic domains of aquaporin-4 on water conduction and array formation. J Mol Biol 402:727–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Abe K, Tani K, Fujiyoshi Y (2011) Conformational rearrangement of gastric H(+), K(+)-ATPase induced by an acid suppressant. Nat Commun 2:155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Abe K, Tani K, Fujiyoshi Y (2009) Inter-subunit interaction of gastric H+, K+-ATPase prevents reverse reaction of the transport cycle. EMBO J 28:1637–1643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abe K, Tani K, Fujiyoshi Y (2010) Structural and functional characterization of H+, K+-ATPase with bound fluorinated phosphate analogs. J Struct Biol 170:60–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mitsuoka K, Hirai T, Murata K, Miyazawa A, Kidera A, Kimura Y, Fujiyoshi Y (1999) The structure of bacteriorhodopsin at 3.0 Å resolution based on electron crystallography: implication of the charge distribution. J Mol Biol 286:861–882PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oshima A, Tani K, Hiroaki Y, Fujiyoshi Y, Sosinsky GE (2007) Three-dimensional structure of a human connexin26 gap junction channel reveals a plug in the vestibule. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:10034–10039PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maeda S, Nakagawa S, Suga M, Yamashita E, Oshima A, Fujiyoshi Y, Tsukihara T (2009) Structure of the connexin 26 gap junction channel at 3.5 Å resolution. Nature 458:597–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Oshima A, Tani K, Toloue MM, Hiroaki Y, Smock A, Inukai S, Cone A, Nicholson BJ, Sosinsky GE, Fujiyoshi Y (2011) Asymmetric configurations and N-terminal rearrangements in connexin26 gap junction channels. J Mol Biol 405:724–735PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Basic Biology, Cellular and Structural Physiology Institute (CeSPI)Nagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations