Choice and Maintenance of Equipment for Electron Crystallography

  • Deryck J. Mills
  • Janet Vonck
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 955)


The choice of equipment for an electron crystallography laboratory will ultimately be determined by the available budget; nevertheless, the ideal lab will have two electron microscopes: a dedicated 300 kV cryo-EM with a field emission gun and a smaller LaB6 machine for screening. The high-end machine should be equipped with photographic film or a very large CCD or CMOS camera for 2D crystal data collection; the screening microscope needs a mid-size CCD for rapid evaluation of crystal samples. The microscope room installations should provide adequate space and a special environment that puts no restrictions on the collection of high-resolution data. Equipment for specimen preparation includes a carbon coater, glow discharge unit, light microscope, plunge freezer, and liquid nitrogen containers and storage dewars. When photographic film is to be used, additional requirements are a film desiccator, dark room, optical diffractometer, and a film scanner. Having the electron microscopes and ancillary equipment well maintained and always in optimum condition facilitates the production of high-quality data.

Key words

Cryo-electron microscopy Electron diffraction High-resolution imaging Photographic film CCD camera Direct electron detector Specimen preparation 2D crystals 



We thank Werner Kühlbrandt and all past and present members of the Department of Structural Biology for their support and contributions to the EM facility.


  1. 1.
    Downing KH (1991) Spot-scan imaging in transmission electron microscopy. Science 251:53–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Williams KA (2000) Three-dimensional structure of the ion-coupled transport protein NhaA. Nature 403:112–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Breyton C, Haase W, Rapoport TA, Kühlbrandt W, Collinson I (2002) Three-dimensional structure of the bacterial protein-translocation complex SecYEG. Nature 418:662–664PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vonck J, Krug von Nidda T, Meier T, Matthey U, Mills DJ, Kühlbrandt W, Dimroth P (2002) Molecular architecture of the undecameric rotor of a bacterial Na+-ATP synthase. J Mol Biol 321:307–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Downing KH (1992) Automatic focus correction for spot-scan imaging of tilted specimens. Ultramicroscopy 46:199–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang DN, Kühlbrandt W (1992) Three-dimensional electron diffraction of plant light-harvesting complex. Biophys J 61:287–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kühlbrandt W, Wang DN, Fujiyoshi Y (1994) Atomic model of plant light-harvesting complex by electron crystallography. Nature 367:614–621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krivanek OL, Mooney PE (1993) Applications of slow-scan CCD cameras in transmission electron microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 49:95–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McMullan G, Chen S, Henderson R, Faruqi AR (2009) Detective quantum efficiency of electron area detectors in electron microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 109:1126–1143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McMullan G, Faruqi AR, Henderson R, Guerrini N, Turchetta R, Jacobs A, van Hoften G (2009) Experimental observation of the improvement in MTF from backthinning a CMOS direct electron detector. Ultramicroscopy 109:1144–1147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Han B-G, Wolf SG, Vonck J, Glaeser RM (1994) Specimen flatness in electron crystallography of glucose-embedded biological materials is significantly affected by the choice of carbon evaporation stock. Ultramicroscopy 55:1–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vonck J (2000) Parameters affecting specimen flatness of two-dimensional crystals for electron crystallography. Ultramicroscopy 85:123–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dubochet J, Adrian M, Chang J-J, Homo J-C, Lepault J, McDowall AW, Schultz P (1988) Cryo-electron microscopy of vitrified specimens. Q Rev Biophys 21:129–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stagg SM, Lander GC, Pulokas J, Fellmann D, Cheng A, Quispe JD, Mallick SP, Avila RM, Carragher B, Potter CS (2006) Automated cryoEM data acquisition and analysis of 284742 particles of GroEL. J Struct Biol 155:470–481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ermantraut E, Wohlfart K, Tichelaar W (1998) Perforated support foils with pre-defined hole size, shape and arrangement. Ultramicroscopy 74:75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Henderson R, Baldwin JM, Ceska TA, Zemlin F, Beckmann E, Downing KH (1990) A model for the structure of bacteriorhodopsin based on high resolution electron cryomicroscopy. J Mol Biol 213:899–929PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institute of BiophysicsFrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations