Three microfluidics-based laboratory exercises were developed and implemented in a high school science classroom setting. The first exercise demonstrated ways in which flows are characterized, including viscosity, turbulence, shear stress, reversibility, compressibility, and hydrodynamic resistance. Students characterized flows in poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic devices in the other two exercises, where they observed the mixing characteristics of laminar flows, and conservation of volumetric flow rate for incompressible flows. In surveys, the students self-reported increased knowledge of microfluidics, and an improved attitude toward science and nanotechnology.
Microfluidics Fluid mechanics High school physics Reynolds number Hydraulic resistance Laminar flow Continuity Dynamic similarity Lab-on-a-chip Microfluidics education Teaching methods
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more
Freedman MP (1997) Relationship among laboratory instruction, attitude toward science, and achievement in science knowledge. J Res Sci Teach 34(4):343–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson RD (2002) Reforming science teaching: what research says about inquiry. J Sci Teach Educ 13(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald JC, Duffy DC, Anderson JR, Chiu DT, Wu H, Schueller OJA, Whitesides GM (2000) Fabrication of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Electrophoresis 21:27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang CWT, Ouellet E, Lagally ET (2010) Using inexpensive jell-o chips for hands-on microfluidics education. Anal Chem 82:5408–5414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondapalli S, Kirby BJ (2009) Refolding of beta-galactosidase: microfluidic device for reagent metering and mixing and quantification of refolding yield. Microfluid Nanofluid 7:275–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar