Currently, the most efficient detection and precise quantification of phytoplasmas is by real-time PCR. Compared to nested PCR, this method is less sensitive to contamination and is less work intensive. Therefore, a universal real-time PCR method will be valuable in screening programs and in other setups in which large numbers of samples are tested.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more
Gundersen DE, Lee I-M (1996) Ultrasensitive detection of phytoplasmas by nested-PCR assays using two universal primer pairs. Phytopathol Mediterr 35:144–151Google Scholar
Smart CD et al (1996) Phytoplasma-specific PCR primers based on sequence of the 16S-23S rRNA spacer region. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:2988–2993PubMedGoogle Scholar
Christensen NM et al (2004) Distribution of phytoplasmas in infected plants as revealed by real-time PCR and bioimaging. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 17:1175–1184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgetts J et al (2009) Panel of 23S rRNA gene-based real-time PCR assays for improved universal and group-specific detection of phytoplasmas. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:2945–2950PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng SJ, Hiruki C (1991) Amplification of 16S ribosomal-RNA genes from culturable and nonculturable mollicutes. J Microbiol Meth 14:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demeke T, Jenkins GR (2010) Influence of DNA extraction methods, PCR inhibitors and quantification method on real-time PCR assay of biotechnology-derived traits. Anal Bioanal Chem 396:1977–1990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar