Abstract
The examination and analysis of super-secondary structures or other specific structural patterns associated with particular functions, sequence motifs, or structural contexts require that the set of structures examined shares the same feature. This seems obvious but in practice this may often present problems such as identifying complete sets of data avoiding false positives. In the case of the β-propeller structures the symmetry of the propeller creates problems for many structure similarity search programs. Here we present a procedure that will identify propeller structures in PDB and assign them to the different N-propeller types. In addition we outline methods to examine similarities and differences within and between the four stranded up-and-down blades of the β-propeller.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Orengo CA, Michie AD, Jones S et al (1997) CATH—a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 5:1093–1108
Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T et al (1995) SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 247:536–540
Rao ST, Rossmann MG (1973) Comparison of super-secondary structures in proteins. J Mol Biol 76:241–256
Varghese JN, Laver WG, Colman PM (1983) Structure of the influenza virus glycoprotein antigen neuraminidase at 2.9 A resolution. Nature 303:35–40
Murzin AG (1992) Structural principles for the propeller assembly of beta-sheets: the preference for seven-fold symmetry. Proteins 14:191–201
Paoli M (2001) Protein folds propelled by diversity. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 76:103–130
Baker SC, Saunders NF, Willis AC et al (1997) Cytochrome cd1 structure: unusual haem environments in a nitrite reductase and analysis of factors contributing to beta-propeller folds. J Mol Biol 269:440–455
Russell RB, Sasieni PD, Sternberg MJ (1998) Supersites within superfolds. Binding site similarity in the absence of homology. J Mol Biol 282:903–918
Quistgaard EM, Thirup SS (2009) Sequence and structural analysis of the Asp-box motif and Asp-box beta-propellers; a widespread propeller-type characteristic of the Vps10 domain family and several glycoside hydrolase families. BMC Struct Biol 9:46
Crennell S, Garman E, Laver G et al (1994) Crystal structure of Vibrio cholerae neuraminidase reveals dual lectin-like domains in addition to the catalytic domain. Structure 2:535–544
Nojiri M, Hira D, Yamaguchi K et al (2006) Crystal structures of cytochrome c(L) and methanol dehydrogenase from Hyphomicrobium denitrificans: structural and mechanistic insights into interactions between the two proteins. Biochemistry 45:3481–3492
Mattei P, Boehringer M, Di Giorgio P et al (2010) Discovery of carmegliptin: a potent and long-acting dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 20:1109–1113
Severi E, Muller A, Potts JR et al (2008) Sialic acid mutarotation is catalyzed by the Escherichia coli beta-propeller protein YjhT. J Biol Chem 283:4841–4849
Jing H, Takagi J, Liu JH et al (2002) Archaeal surface layer proteins contain beta propeller, PKD, and beta helix domains and are related to metazoan cell surface proteins. Structure 10:1453–1464
Springer TA (1998) An extracellular beta-propeller module predicted in lipoprotein and scavenger receptors, tyrosine kinases, epidermal growth factor precursor, and extracellular matrix components. J Mol Biol 283:837–862
Chaudhuri I, Soding J, Lupas AN (2008) Evolution of the beta-propeller fold. Proteins 71:795–803
Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z et al (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28:235–242
Finn RD, Mistry J, Tate J et al (2010) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 38:D211–D222
Holm L, Rosenstrom P (2010) Dali server: conservation mapping in 3D. Nucleic Acids Res 38:W545–W549
Velankar S, Alhroub Y, Alili A et al (2011) PDBe: Protein Data Bank in Europe. Nucleic Acids Res 39:D402–D410
Kleywegt GJ (1999) Recognition of spatial motifs in protein structures. J Mol Biol 285:1887–1897
Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DM et al (2009) Jalview Version 2–a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25:1189–1191
Konagurthu AS, Whisstock JC, Stuckey PJ et al (2006) MUSTANG: a multiple structural alignment algorithm. Proteins 64:559–574
Nurizzo D, Turkenburg JP, Charnock SJ et al (2002) Cellvibrio japonicus alpha-l-arabinanase 43A has a novel five-blade beta-propeller fold. Nat Struct Biol 9:665–668
Forouhar F, Abashidze M, Conover K et al (2005) unpublished
Williams PA, Fulop V, Garman EF et al (1997) Haem-ligand switching during catalysis in crystals of a nitrogen-cycle enzyme. Nature 389:406–412
Malby RL, McCoy AJ, Kortt AA et al (1998) Three-dimensional structures of single-chain Fv-neuraminidase complexes. J Mol Biol 279:901–910
Quistgaard EM, Madsen P, Groftehauge MK et al (2009) Ligands bind to Sortilin in the tunnel of a ten-bladed beta-propeller domain. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16:96–98
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank The Lundbeck Foundation for financial support through the MIND Centre and The Danish National Research Foundation for funding through the CARB Centre.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Thirup, S., Gupta, V., Quistgaard, E.M. (2012). Up, Down, and Around: Identifying Recurrent Interactions Within and Between Super-secondary Structures in β-Propellers. In: Kister, A. (eds) Protein Supersecondary Structures. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 932. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-065-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-065-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-064-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-065-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols