Protein Supersecondary Structures pp 205-218 | Cite as
Protein Folding at Atomic Resolution: Analysis of Autonomously Folding Supersecondary Structure Motifs by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
- 6 Citations
- 1.4k Downloads
Abstract
The study of protein folding has been conventionally hampered by the assumption that all single-domain proteins fold by an all-or-none process (two-state folding) that makes it impossible to resolve folding mechanisms experimentally. Here we describe an experimental method for the thermodynamic analysis of protein folding at atomic resolution using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The method is specifically developed for the study of small proteins that fold autonomously into basic supersecondary structure motifs, and that do so in the sub-millisecond timescale (folding archetypes). From the NMR experiments we obtain hundreds of atomic unfolding curves that are subsequently analyzed leading to the determination of the characteristic network of folding interactions. The application of this approach to a comprehensive catalog of elementary folding archetypes holds the promise of becoming the first experimental approach capable of unraveling the basic rules connecting protein structure and folding mechanism.
Key words
Protein structure Protein stability Protein folding Folding mechanisms Folding interaction networks Nuclear magnetic resonanceNotes
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Marie Curie Excellence Award MEXT-CT-2006-042334, and the grants BFU2008-03237, BFU2008-03278 and CONSOLIDER CSD2009-00088 from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN).
References
- 1.Bryngelson JD, Onuchic JN, Socci ND et al (1995) Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein-folding—a synthesis. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 21:167–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Pande VJ (2008) Computer simulations of protein folding. In: Muñoz V (ed) Protein folding, misfolding and aggregation: classical themes and novel approaches, RSC, Cambridge, pp 161–187Google Scholar
- 3.Jackson SE (1998) How do small single-domain proteins fold? Fold Des 3:R81–R91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Kubelka J, Hofrichter J, Eaton WA (2004) The protein folding “speed limit”. Curr Opin Struct Biol 14:76–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Muñoz V (2007) Conformational dynamics and ensembles in protein folding. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 36:395–412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Naganathan AN, Doshi U, Fung A et al (2006) Dynamics, energetics, and structure in protein folding. Biochemistry 45:8466–8475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Yang WY, Gruebele M (2003) Folding at the speed limit. Nature 423:193–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Muñoz V, Sanchez-Ruiz JM (2004) Exploring protein-folding ensembles: a variable-barrier model for the analysis of equilibrium unfolding experiments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:17646–17651PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Naganathan AN, Sanchez-Ruiz JM, Muñoz V (2005) Direct measurement of barrier heights in protein folding. J Am Chem Soc 127:17970–17971PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Naganathan AN, Perez-Jimenez R, Sanchez-Ruiz JM et al (2005) Robustness of downhill folding: guidelines for the analysis of equilibrium folding experiments on small proteins. Biochemistry 44:7435–7449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Muñoz V (2002) Thermodynamics and kinetics of downhill protein folding investigated with a simple statistical mechanical model. Int J Quant Chem 90:1522–1528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Garcia-Mira MM, Sadqi M, Fischer N et al (2002) Experimental identification of downhill protein folding. Science 298:2191–2195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Sadqi M, Fushman D, Muñoz V (2006) Atom-by-atom analysis of global downhill protein folding. Nature 442:317–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Fung A, Li P, Godoy-Ruiz R et al (2008) Expanding the realm of ultrafast protein folding: gpW, a midsize natural single-domain with alpha + beta topology that folds downhill. J Am Chem Soc 130:7489–7495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Marti-Renom MA, Stuart A, Fiser A et al (2000) Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 29:291–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.De Sancho D, Munoz V (2011) Integrated prediction of protein folding and unfolding rates from only size and structural class. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13: 17030–17043Google Scholar
- 17.Bax A, Grzesiek S (1993) Methodological advances in protein NMR. Acc Chem Res 26:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Cavanagh J, Fairbrother WJ III, AGP, Rance M et al (1996) Chemical exchange effects in NMR spectroscopy, in protein NMR spectroscopy: principles and practice, Academic Press, San Diego, p 391–404Google Scholar
- 19.Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW et al (1995) NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J Biomol NMR 6:277–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Garret DS, Powers R, Gronenborn AM et al (1991) A common sense approach to peak picking in two-, three-, and four-dimensional spectra using computer analysis of contour diagrams. J Magn Reson 95:214–220Google Scholar
- 21.Brandes U, Wagner D (2004) In: Juenger M, Mutzel P (ed) Visone—analysis and visualization of social networks, in Graph drawing software, Springer, New York, p 321–340Google Scholar
- 22.Schanda P, Brutscher B (2005) Very fast two-dimensional NMR Spectroscopy for real-time investigation of dynamic events in proteins on the time scale of seconds. J Am Chem Soc 127:8014–8015PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Amman C, Meier P, Merbach AE (1982) A simple multinuclear NMR thermometer. J Magn Reson 46:319–321Google Scholar
- 24.Naganathan AN, Muñoz V (2008) Determining denaturation midpoints in multiprobe equilibrium protein folding experiments. Biochemistry 47:6752–6761PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Sadqi M, Fushman D, Muñoz V (2007) Structural biology—analysis of protein-folding cooperativity—reply. Nature 445:E17–E18CrossRefGoogle Scholar