Embryo Culture pp 61-80

Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 912) | Cite as

Media Composition: Salts and Osmolality



The main components of embryo culture media are salts, which dissociate into their component inorganic ions in aqueous solution. All embryo culture media contain the same six inorganic ions: Na+, K+, Cl-, Ca2+, Mg2+, and SO42-, while most also contain PO42-. The salts that are used to formulate embryo culture media can be traced back to classic saline solutions, particularly Krebs-Ringer Bicarbonate (KRB), that were developed for somatic cells in the first half of the twentieth century. The salt and inorganic ion concentrations in the first successful defined mouse embryo culture medium, Whittens medium, were identical to those in KRB. These remained largely unchanged in embryo culture media for decades, with similar levels found in the standard mouse embryo culture medium, M16, formulated in the 1970s. Human embryos were initially cultured in undefined somatic cell media such as Earles and Hams F-10 with serum added. This changed in the mid-1980s, however, with the development of Quinns HTF, a defined medium specifically formulated for human embryo culture, in which the inorganic ion concentrations are similar to those in M16 and Whittens. While these media were useful both for experimental work and clinically, embryos suffered developmental blocks in all of them, with mouse embryos blocking at the 2-cell stage and human embryos at the 4- to 8-cell stage. Starting in the late 1980s, however, mouse embryo culture media were first developed that alleviated these developmental blocks. These media, CZB and KSOM, had much lower osmolalities than previous media, mainly due to lower inorganic ion concentrations. Indeed, lowering total inorganic ion concentration and osmolality proved key to understanding how media that supported complete preimplantation development in vitro can be formulated. A subsequent improvement was the addition of amino acids to culture media for both mouse and human embryos. At least in part, their beneficial effect during the cleavage stages of development is due to the presence in early preimplantation embryos of mechanisms for cell volume regulation that depend on the accumulation of amino acids as organic osmolytes to provide intracellular osmotic support. These amino acids, principally glycine, replace a portion of the intracellular inorganic ions that would otherwise be needed to maintain cell size, preventing the intracellular ionic strength from rising to deleterious levels and blocking development. Thus, the optimum salts levels, osmolality, and amino acid contents of culture media are not independent, but interact strongly because of their roles in cell volume regulation. In the absence of compounds that preimplantation embryos can use as organic osmolytes, embryos will develop only at lower osmolalities and salt concentrations in the medium. However, when organic osmolytes such as some amino acids are present, embryos will develop in culture at higher osmolarities that are similar to those they experience in tubal fluid in vivo.

Key words

Amino acids Culture Embryo Ions Media Osmolality Osmolarity Osmolyte Preimplantation Salts 


  1. 1.
    Biggers JD (1998) Reflections on the culture of the preimplantation embryo. Int J Dev Biol 42:879–884PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Whitten WK (1956) Culture of tubal mouse ova. Nature 177:96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Giroux EL, Henkin RI (1973) Macromolecular ligands of exchangeable copper, zinc and cadmium in human serum. Bioinorg Chem 2:125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burton, RF (1975) Appendix A: osmolality and osmotic coefficients. In: Ringer solutions and physiological salines. Wright Scientechnica, BristolGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brachet A (1912) Développement in vitro de blastodermes et de jeunes embryons de Mammifères. C R Acad Sci Paris 155:1191–1193Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lewis WH, Hartmann CG (1933) Early cleavage stages of the egg of the monkey (Macacus rhesus). Contrib Embryol (Carnegie Inst Wash) 24:187–201Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alexandre H (2001) A history of mammalian embryological research. Int J Dev Biol 45:457–467PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pincus G (1936) The eggs of mammals. MacMillan, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krebs HA, Henseleit K (1932) Untersuchen über die Harnstoffbildung im Tierkörper. Z Phys Chem 210:33–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McLaren A, Biggers JD (1958) Successful development and birth of mice cultivated in vitro as early as early embryos. Nature 182:877–878PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Whitten WK (1957) Culture of tubal ova. Nature 179:1081–1082PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Biggers JD, Whittingham DG, Donahue RP (1967) The pattern of energy metabolism in the mouse oocyte and zygote. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 58:560–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Whittingham DG, Biggers JD (1967) Fallopian tube and early cleavage in the mouse. Nature 213:942–943PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Whittingham DG (1971) Culture of mouse ova. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 14:7–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hogan B et al (1994) Manipulating the mouse embryo: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Plainview, NYGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baltz JM, Tartia AP (2010) Cell volume regulation in oocytes and early embryos: connecting physiology to successful culture media. Hum Reprod Update 16:166–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McKiernan SH, Clayton MK, Bavister BD (1995) Analysis of stimulatory and inhibitory amino acids for development of hamster one-cell embryos in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev 42:188–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Quinn P, Kerin JF, Warnes GM (1985) Improved pregnancy rate in human in vitro fertilization with the use of a medium based on the composition of human tubal fluid. Fertil Steril 44:493–498PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goddard MJ, Pratt HPM (1983) Control of events during early cleavage of the mouse embryo: an analysis of the ‘2-cell block’. Development 73:111–133Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schini SA, Bavister BD (1988) Two-cell block to development of cultured hamster embryos is caused by phosphate and glucose. Biol Reprod 39:1183–1192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kishi J et al (1991) Block to development in cultured rat 1-cell embryos is overcome using medium HECM-1. Hum Reprod 6: 1445–1448PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Camous S et al (1984) Cleavage beyond the block stage and survival after transfer of early bovine embryos cultured with trophoblastic vesicles. J Reprod Fertil 72:479–485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bolton VN et al (1989) Development of spare human preimplantation embryos in vitro: an analysis of the correlations among gross morphology, cleavage rates, and development to the blastocyst. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer 6:30–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chatot CL et al (1989) An improved culture medium supports development of random-bred 1-cell mouse embryos in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 86:679–688PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lawitts JA, Biggers JD (1991) Optimization of mouse embryo culture media using simplex methods. J Reprod Fertil 91:543–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lawitts JA, Biggers JD (1992) Joint effects of sodium chloride, glutamine, and glucose in mouse preimplantation embryo culture media. Mol Reprod Dev 31:189–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Biggers JD, Lawitts JA, Lechene CP (1993) The protective action of betaine on the deleterious effects of NaCl on preimplantation mouse embryos in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev 34:380–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lawitts JA, Biggers JD (1993) Culture of preimplantation embryos. Methods Enzymol 225:153–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Erbach GT et al (1994) Differential growth of the mouse preimplantation embryo in chemically defined media (published erratum appears in Biol Reprod 1994 Aug;51(2):345). Biol Reprod 50:1027–1033PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gardner DK, Lane M (1996) Alleviation of the ‘2-cell block’ and development to the blastocyst of CF1 mouse embryos: role of amino acids, EDTA and physical parameters. Hum Reprod 11:2703–2712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ho Y et al (1995) Preimplantation development of mouse embryos in KSOM: augmentation by amino acids and analysis of gene expression. Mol Reprod Dev 41:232–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Biggers JD, McGinnis LK, Raffin M (2000) Amino acids and preimplantation development of the mouse in protein- free potassium simplex optimized medium. Biol Reprod 63:281–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lane M, Gardner DK (1997) Differential regulation of mouse embryo development and viability by amino acids. J Reprod Fertil 109:153–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Edwards RG (1981) Test-tube babies, 1981. Nature 293:253–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Borland RM et al (1980) Elemental composition of fluid in the human Fallopian tube. J Reprod Fertil 58:479–482PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lippes J et al (1972) The collection and analysis of human fallopian tubal fluid. Contraception 5:85–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gardner DK, Lane M (1999) Embryo culture systems. In: Trounson AO, Gardner DK (eds) Handbook of in vitro fertilization. CRC, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kaplan JH (2002) Biochemistry of Na, K-ATPase. Annu Rev Biochem 71:511–535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hediger MA et al (2004) The ABCs of solute carriers: physiological, pathological and therapeutic implications of human membrane transport proteins: introduction. Pflugers Arch 447:465–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Devreker F, Hardy K (1997) Effects of glutamine and taurine on preimplantation development and cleavage of mouse embryos in vitro. Biol Reprod 57:921–928PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Baltz JM (2001) Osmoregulation and cell volume regulation in the preimplantation embryo. In: Schatten GP (ed) Current topics in developmental biology. Academic, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dawson KM, Baltz JM (1997) Organic osmolytes and embryos: substrates of the Gly and beta transport systems protect mouse zygotes against the effects of raised osmolarity. Biol Reprod 56:1550–1558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hadi T et al (2005) Similar effects of osmolarity, glucose, and phosphate on cleavage past the 2-cell stage in mouse embryos from outbred and F1 hybrid females. Biol Reprod 72:179–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Collins JL, Baltz JM (1999) Estimates of mouse oviductal fluid tonicity based on osmotic responses of embryos. Biol Reprod 60:1188–1193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fiorenza MT et al (2004) Early transcriptional activation of the hsp70.1 gene by osmotic stress in one-cell embryos of the mouse. Biol Reprod 70:1606–1613PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Li R et al (2007) Concentration and composition of free amino acids and osmolalities of ­porcine oviductal and uterine fluid and their effects on development of porcine IVF embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 74:1228–1235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Waring DW (1976) Rate of formation and osmolality of oviductal fluid in the cycling rat. Biol Reprod 15:297–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Williams N, Kraft N, Shortman K (1972) The separation of different cell classes from lymphoid organs. VI. The effect of osmolarity of gradient media on the density distribution of cells. Immunology 22:885–899PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Waymouth C (1970) Osmolality of mammalian blood and of media for culture of mammalian cells. In Vitro 6:109–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Knudsen JF et al (1979) Follicular fluid electrolytes and osmolality in cyclic pigs. J Reprod Fertil 57:419–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Anon (1980) Normal reference laboratory values. N Engl J Med 302:37–48Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hallows KR, Knauf PA (1994) Principles of cell volume regulation. In: Strange K (ed) Cellular and molecular physiology of cell volume regulation. CRC, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hoffmann EK, Lambert IH, Pedersen SF (2009) Physiology of cell volume regulation in vertebrates. Physiol Rev 89:193–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Alexander RT, Grinstein S (2006) Na+/H+ exchangers and the regulation of volume. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 187:159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Jiang L, Chernova MN, Alper SL (1997) Secondary regulatory volume increase conferred on Xenopus oocytes by expression of AE2 anion exchanger. Am J Physiol 272: C191–C202PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Yancey PH et al (1982) Living with water stress: evolution of osmolyte systems. Science 217:1214–1222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Lang F, Busch GL, Volkl H (1998) The diversity of volume regulatory mechanisms. Cell Physiol Biochem 8:1–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Yancey PH (1994) Compatible and counteracting solutes. In: Strange K (ed) Cellular and molecular physiology of cell volume regulation. CRC, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Van Winkle LJ, Haghighat N, Campione AL (1990) Glycine protects preimplantation mouse conceptuses from a detrimental effect on development of the inorganic ions in oviductal fluid. J Exp Zool 253:215–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hammer MA, Baltz JM (2003) Beta-alanine but not taurine can function as an organic osmolyte in preimplantation mouse embryos cultured from fertilized eggs. Mol Reprod Dev 66:153–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Steeves CL et al (2003) The glycine neurotransmitter transporter GLYT1 is an organic osmolyte transporter regulating cell volume in cleavage-stage embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:13982–13987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Tartia AP et al (2009) Cell volume regulation is initiated in mouse oocytes after ovulation. Development 136:2247–2254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Hammer MA et al (2000) Glycine transport by single human and mouse embryos. Hum Reprod 15:419–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Lewis AM, Kaye PL (1992) Characterization of glutamine uptake in mouse two-cell embryos and blastocysts. J Reprod Fertil 95:221–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kwon HM, Handler JS (1995) Cell volume regulated transporters of compatible osmolytes. Curr Opin Cell Biol 7:465–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Pastor-Anglada M et al (1996) Long-term osmotic regulation of amino acid transport systems in mammalian cells. Amino Acids 11:135–151Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Anas MKI et al (2007) The organic osmolytes betaine and proline are transported by a shared system in early preimplantation mouse embryos. J Cell Physiol 210:266–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Anas MK et al (2008) SIT1 is a betaine/proline transporter that is activated in mouse eggs after fertilization and functions until the 2-cell stage. Development 135:4123–4130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations