Skip to main content

Mapping Assembly Favored and Remodeled Nucleosome Positions on Polynucleosomal Templates

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
  • 3140 Accesses

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 833))

Abstract

Positioning of nucleosomes regulates the access of DNA binding factors to their consensus sequences. Nucleosome positions are determined, at least in part by the effects of DNA sequence during nucleosome assembly. Nucleosomes can also be repositioned (moved in cis) by ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling complexes. Most studies of repositioning have used short DNA fragments containing a single nucleosome. It is difficult to use this type of template to analyze the role of DNA sequence in repositioning, however, because the many remodeling complexes are strongly influenced by nearby DNA ends. Mononucleosomal templates also cannot provide information about how repositioning occurs in the context of chromatin, where the presence of flanking nucleosomes could limit repositioning options. This protocol describes a newly developed method that allows the mapping of nucleosome positions (with and without remodeling) on any chosen region of a plasmid polynucleosomal template in vitro. The approach uses MNase digestion to release nucleosome-protected DNA fragments, followed by restriction enzyme digestion to locally unique sites, and Southern blotting, to provide a comprehensive map of nucleosome positions within a probe region. It was developed as part of studies which showed that human remodeling enzymes tended to move nucleosomes away from high affinity nucleosome positioning sequences, and also that there were differences in repositioning specificity between different remodeling complexes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Protocol
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

References

  1. Miele V, Vaillant C, d’Aubenton-Carafa Y, Thermes C and Grange T (2008) DNA physical properties determine nucleosome occupancy from yeast to fly. Nucleic Acids Res 36:3746–3756.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shivaswamy S, Bhinge A, Zhao Y, Jones S, Hirst M and Iyer VR (2008) Dynamic remodeling of individual nucleosomes across a eukaryotic genome in response to transcriptional perturbation. PLoS Biol 6:e65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schones DE, Cui K, Cuddapah S, Roh TY, Barski A, Wang Z, Wei G and Zhao K (2008) Dynamic regulation of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. Cell 132:887–898.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tillo D, Kaplan N, Moore IK, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Gossett AJ, Field Y, Lieb JD, Widom J, Segal E and Hughes TR (2010) High nucleosome occupancy is encoded at human regulatory sequences. PLoS One 5:e9129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schnitzler GR (2008) Control of Nucleosome Positions by DNA Sequence and Remodeling Machines. Cell Biochem Biophys 51:67–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramachandran A and Schnitzler G (2004) Regulating transcription one nucleosome at a time: Nature and function of chromatin remodeling complex products. Recent Res Devel Mol Cell Biol 5:149–170.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Saha A, Wittmeyer J and Cairns BR (2006) Chromatin remodelling: the industrial revolution of DNA around histones. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:437–447.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ulyanova NP and Schnitzler GR (2005) Human SWI/SNF generates abundant, structurally altered dinucleosomes on polynucleosomal templates. Mol Cell Biol 25:11156–11170.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sims HI, Baughman CB and Schnitzler GR (2008) Human SWI/SNF directs sequence-specific chromatin changes on promoter polynucleosomes. Nucleic Acids Res 36:6118–6131.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pham CD, He X and Schnitzler GR (2010) Divergent human remodeling complexes remove nucleosomes from strong positioning sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 38:400–413.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Utley RT, Owen-Hughes TA, Juan LJ, Cote J, Adams CC and Workman JL (1996) In vitro analysis of transcription factor binding to nucleosomes and nucleosome disruption/displacement. Methods Enzymol 274:276–291.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schnitzler G, Sif S and Kingston RE (1998) Human SWI/SNF interconverts a nucleosome between its base state and a stable remodeled state. Cell 94:17–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gavin R. Schnitzler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Sims, H.I., Pham, C.D., Schnitzler, G.R. (2012). Mapping Assembly Favored and Remodeled Nucleosome Positions on Polynucleosomal Templates. In: Morse, R. (eds) Chromatin Remodeling. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 833. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-477-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-477-3_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-476-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-477-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics