Chromatin Remodeling pp 271-287 | Cite as
In Vitro Reconstitution of In Vivo-Like Nucleosome Positioning on Yeast DNA
- 5 Citations
- 3k Downloads
Abstract
Genome-wide nucleosome mapping in vivo highlighted the extensive degree of well-defined nucleosome positioning. Such positioned nucleosomes, especially in promoter regions, control access to DNA and constitute an important level of genome regulation. However, the molecular mechanisms that lead to nucleosome positioning are far from understood. In order to dissect this mechanism in detail with biochemical tools, an in vitro system is necessary that can generate proper nucleosome positioning de novo. We present a protocol that allows the assembly of nucleosomes with very much in vivo-like positioning on budding yeast DNA, either of single loci or of the whole-genome. Our method combines salt gradient dialysis and incubation with yeast extract in the presence of ATP. It provides an invaluable tool for the study of nucleosome positioning mechanisms, and can be used to assess the relative stability of properly positioned nucleosomes. It may also generate more physiological templates for in vitro studies of, e.g., nucleosome remodeling or transcription through chromatin.
Key words
Nucleosome positioning In vitro reconstitution Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast extract Salt gradient dialysisNotes
Acknowledgments
Work in our laboratory is funded by the German Research Community (DFG, grant within the SFB/Transregio 5) and through the 6th Framework Programme of the European Community (NET grant within the Network of Excellence The Epigenome). We thank Nils Krietenstein for critical reading of the manuscript. This paper is dedicated to the memory of Eduard Buchner, who founded biochemistry by demonstrating the power of yeast extracts.
References
- 1.Radman-Livaja, M. and Rando, O. J. (2010) Nucleosome positioning: how is it established, and why does it matter? Dev. Biol. 339, 258–266.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Segal, E. and Widom, J. (2009) What controls nucleosome positions? Trends Genet. 25, 335–343.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Jiang, C. and Pugh, B. F. (2009) Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation: advances through genomics Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Yuan, G. C., Liu, Y. J., Dion, M. F., Slack, M. D., Wu, L. F., Altschuler, S. J., and Rando, O. J. (2005) Genome-scale identification of nucleosome positions in S. cerevisiae Science 309, 626–630.Google Scholar
- 5.Mavrich, T. N., Jiang, C., Ioshikhes, I. P., Li, X., Venters, B. J., Zanton, S. J., Tomsho, L. P., Qi, J., Glaser, R. L., Schuster, S. C., Gilmour, D. S., Albert, I., and Pugh, B. F. (2008) Nucleosome organization in the Drosophila genome Nature 453, 358–362.Google Scholar
- 6.Valouev, A., Ichikawa, J., Tonthat, T., Stuart, J., Ranade, S., Peckham, H., Zeng, K., Malek, J. A., Costa, G., McKernan, K., Sidow, A., Fire, A., and Johnson, S. M. (2008) A high-resolution, nucleosome position map of C. elegans reveals a lack of universal sequence-dictated positioning Genome Res. 18, 1051–1063.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Schones, D. E., Cui, K., Cuddapah, S., Roh, T. Y., Barski, A., Wang, Z., Wei, G., and Zhao, K. (2008) Dynamic regulation of nucleosome positioning in the human genome Cell 132, 887–898.Google Scholar
- 8.Lee, W., Tillo, D., Bray, N., Morse, R. H., Davis, R. W., Hughes, T. R., and Nislow, C. (2007) A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast Nat. Genet. 39, 1235–1244.Google Scholar
- 9.Lantermann, A. B., Straub, T., Stralfors, A., Yuan, G. C., Ekwall, K., and Korber, P. (2010) Schizosaccharomyces pombe genome-wide nucleosome mapping reveals positioning mechanisms distinct from those of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 251–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Stein, A. (1989) Reconstitution of chromatin from purified components Methods Enzymol. 170, 585–603.Google Scholar
- 11.Rhodes, D. and Laskey, R. A. (1989) Assembly of nucleosomes and chromatin in vitro Methods Enzymol. 170, 575–585.Google Scholar
- 12.Luger, K., Rechsteiner, T. J., and Richmond, T. J. (1999) Expression and purification of recombinant histones and nucleosome reconstitution Methods Mol. Biol. 119, 1–16.Google Scholar
- 13.Widom, J. (2001) Role of DNA sequence in nucleosome stability and dynamics Q. Rev. Biophys. 34, 269–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Schnitzler, G. R. (2008) Control of nucleosome positions by DNA sequence and remodeling machines Cell Biochem. Biophys. 51, 67–80.Google Scholar
- 15.Kaplan, N., Moore, I. K., Fondufe-Mittendorf, Y., Gossett, A. J., Tillo, D., Field, Y., LeProust, E. M., Hughes, T. R., Lieb, J. D., Widom, J., and Segal, E. (2009) The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome Nature 458, 362–366.Google Scholar
- 16.Zhang, Y., Moqtaderi, Z., Rattner, B. P., Euskirchen, G., Snyder, M., Kadonaga, J. T., Liu, X. S., and Struhl, K. (2009) Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 847–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Pugh, B. F. (2010) A preoccupied position on nucleosomes Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Kaplan, N., Hughes, T. R., Lieb, J. D., Widom, J., and Segal, E. (2010) Contribution of histone sequence preferences to nucleosome organization: proposed definitions and methodology Genome Biol. 11, 140.Google Scholar
- 19.Simpson, R. T. and Stafford, D. W. (1983) Structural features of a phased nucleosome core particle Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80, 51–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Neubauer, B., Linxweiler, W., and Hörz, W. (1986) DNA engineering shows that nucleosome phasing on the African green monkey alpha-satellite is the result of multiple additive histone-DNA interactions J. Mol. Biol. 190, 639–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Lowary, P. T. and Widom, J. (1998) New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning J. Mol. Biol. 276, 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Lusser, A. and Kadonaga, J. T. (2004) Strategies for the reconstitution of chromatin Nat. Methods 1, 19–26.Google Scholar
- 23.Pazin, M. J., Bhargava, P., Geiduschek, E. P., and Kadonaga, J. T. (1997) Nucleosome mobility and the maintenance of nucleosome positioning. Science 276, 809–812.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Langst, G., Becker, P. B., and Grummt, I. (1998) TTF-I determines the chromatin architecture of the active rDNA promoter EMBO J. 17, 3135–3145.Google Scholar
- 25.Robinson, K. M. and Schultz, M. C. (2003) Replication-independent assembly of nucleosome arrays in a novel yeast chromatin reconstitution system involves antisilencing factor Asf1p and chromodomain protein Chd1p Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 7937–7946.Google Scholar
- 26.Schultz, M. C. (1999) Chromatin assembly in yeast cell-free extracts Methods 17, 161–172.Google Scholar
- 27.Schultz, M. C., Hockman, D. J., Harkness, T. A., Garinther, W. I., and Altheim, B. A. (1997) Chromatin assembly in a yeast whole-cell extract Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 9034–9039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Hertel, C. B., Längst, G., Hörz, W., and Korber, P. (2005) Nucleosome stability at the yeast PHO5 and PHO8 promoters correlates with differential cofactor requirements for chromatin opening Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 10755–10767.Google Scholar
- 29.Wippo, C. J., Krstulovic, B. S., Ertel, F., Musladin, S., Blaschke, D., Sturzl, S., Yuan, G. C., Hörz, W., Korber, P., and Barbaric, S. (2009) Differential cofactor requirements for histone eviction from two nucleosomes at the yeast PHO84 promoter are determined by intrinsic nucleosome stability Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 2960–2981.Google Scholar
- 30.Zhang, Z., Wippo, C. J., Wal, M., Ward, E., Korber, P., and Pugh, B. F. (2011) A packing mechanism for nucleosome organization reconstituted across a eukaryotic genome. Science 332, 977–980.Google Scholar
- 31.Ertel, F., Dirac-Svejstrup, A. B., Hertel, C. B., Blaschke, D., Svejstrup, J. Q., and Korber, P. (2010) In vitro reconstitution of PHO5 promoter chromatin remodeling points to a role for activator-nucleosome competition in vivo Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 4060–4076.Google Scholar
- 32.Patterton, H. G. and von Holt, C. (1993) Negative supercoiling and nucleosome cores. I. The effect of negative supercoiling on the efficiency of nucleosome core formation in vitro J. Mol. Biol. 229, 623–636.Google Scholar
- 33.Simon, R. H. and Felsenfeld, G. (1979) A new procedure for purifying histone pairs H2A + H2B and H3 + H4 from chromatin using hydroxylapatite Nucleic Acids Res. 6, 689–696.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Svaren, J., Venter, U., and Hörz, W. (1995) In vivo analysis of nucleosome structure and transcription factor binding in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Methods in Mol. Genet. 6, 153–167.Google Scholar
- 35.Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (Edition) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.Google Scholar
- 36.Wippo, C. J., Israel, L., Watanabe, S., Hochheimer, A., Peterson, C. L., and Korber, P. (2011) The RSC chromatin remodelling enzyme has a unique role in directing the accurate positioning of nucleosomes EMBO J. 30, 1277–1288.Google Scholar
- 37.Germond, J. E., Hirt, B., Oudet, P., Gross-Bellark, M., and Chambon, P. (1975) Folding of the DNA double helix in chromatin-like structures from simian virus 40 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72, 1843–1847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Pfaffle, P. and Jackson, V. (1990) Studies on rates of nucleosome formation with DNA under stress J. Biol. Chem. 265, 16821–16829.Google Scholar
- 39.Nightingale, K. P. and Becker, P. B. (1998) Structural and functional analysis of chromatin assembled from defined histones Methods A Companion To Methods In Enzymology 15, 343–353.Google Scholar
- 40.Huynh, V. A., Robinson, P. J., and Rhodes, D. (2005) A method for the in vitro reconstitution of a defined “30 nm” chromatin fibre containing stoichiometric amounts of the linker histone J. Mol. Biol. 345, 957–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Korber, P. and Hörz, W. (2004) In vitro assembly of the characteristic chromatin organization at the yeast PHO5 promoter by a replication-independent extract system J. Biol. Chem. 279, 35113–35120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar