Chromatin Immunoprecipitation of Mouse Embryos

  • Anne K. VossEmail author
  • Mathew P. Dixon
  • Tamara McLennan
  • Andrew J. Kueh
  • Tim Thomas
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 809)


During prenatal development, a large number of different cell types are formed, the vast majority of which contain identical genetic material. The basis of the great variety in cell phenotype and function is the differential expression of the approximately 25,000 genes in the mammalian genome. Transcriptional activity is regulated at many levels by proteins, including members of the basal transcriptional apparatus, DNA-binding transcription factors, and chromatin-binding proteins. Importantly, chromatin structure dictates the availability of a specific genomic locus for transcriptional activation as well as the efficiency, with which transcription can occur. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) is a method to assess if chromatin modifications or proteins are present at a specific locus. ChIP involves the cross linking of DNA and associated proteins and immunoprecipitation using specific antibodies to DNA-associated proteins followed by examination of the co-precipitated DNA sequences or proteins. In the last few years, ChIP has become an essential technique for scientists studying transcriptional regulation and chromatin structure. Using ChIP on mouse embryos, we can document the presence or absence of specific proteins and chromatin modifications at genomic loci in vivo during mammalian development. Here, we describe a ChIP technique adapted for mouse embryos.

Key words

ChIP Histones Transcription factors Activators Repressors Chromatin-modifying enzymes 


  1. 1.
    Luger, K., Mader, A. W., Richmond, R. K., Sargent, D. F., and Richmond, T. J. (1997) Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution, Nature 389, 251–260.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kireeva, N., Lakonishok, M., Kireev, I., Hirano, T., and Belmont, A. S. (2004) Visualization of early chromosome condensation: a hierarchical folding, axial glue model of chromosome structure, J Cell Biol 166, 775–785.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tremethick, D. J. (2007) Higher-order structures of chromatin: the elusive 30 nm fiber, Cell 128, 651–654.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schones, D. E., and Zhao, K. (2008) Genome-wide approaches to studying chromatin modifications, Nat Rev Genet 9, 179–191.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shogren-Knaak, M., Ishii, H., Sun, J. M., Pazin, M. J., Davie, J. R., and Peterson, C. L. (2006) Histone H4-K16 acetylation controls chromatin structure and protein interactions, Science 311, 844–847.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Voss, A. K., Collin, C., Dixon, M. P., and Thomas, T. (2009) Moz and retinoic acid coordinately regulate H3K9 acetylation, Hox gene expression, and segment identity, Dev Cell 17, 674–686.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pfaffl, M. W. (2004) Quantification strategies in real-time PCR, in A-Z of quantitative PCR (Bustin, S. A., Ed.), International University Line (IUL), La Jolla, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Taneyhill, L. A., and Adams, M. S. (2008) Investigating regulatory factors and their DNA binding affinities through real time quantitative PCR (RT-QPCR) and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays, Methods Cell Biol 87, 367–389.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Henikoff, S. (2008) Nucleosome destabilization in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression, Nat Rev Genet 9, 15–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne K. Voss
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mathew P. Dixon
    • 1
  • Tamara McLennan
    • 1
  • Andrew J. Kueh
    • 1
  • Tim Thomas
    • 1
  1. 1.The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical ResearchMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations