The Mouse Defense Test Battery: A Model Measuring Different Facets of Anxiety-Related Behaviors

  • Guy Griebel
  • Sandra Beeské
Part of the Neuromethods book series (NM, volume 63)


Defensive behaviors of lower mammals constitute a significant model for understanding human emotional disorders. They generally occur in response to a number of threatening stimuli, including predators, attacking conspecifics, and dangerous objects or situations. Such behaviors can readily be studied in wild rats, wild mice, or in several laboratory mice, which show a complete defensive repertoire in response to danger. Here we describe the mouse defense test battery (MDTB), which measures flight, freezing, defensive threat and attack, and risk assessment in response to an unconditioned predator stimulus, and postthreat (conditioned) defensiveness to the test context. The MDTB represents a significant improvement over other animal models for evaluating drugs active against emotional disorders since it is capable of responding to and differentiating anxiolytic drugs of different classes through specific profiles of effect on different measures.

Key words

Mouse defense test battery Anxiety Panic Defense repertoire Risk assessment Flight Defensive aggression 


  1. 1.
    Blanchard RJ, Flannelly KJ, Blanchard DC (1986) Defensive behavior of laboratory and wild Rattus norvegicus. J Comp Psychol 100:101–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blanchard RJ, Parmigiani S, Agullana R, Weiss SM, Blanchard DC (1995) Behaviors of Swiss-Webster and C57/BL/6 N sin mice in a fear/ defense test battery. Aggress Behav 21:21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Griebel G, Sanger DJ, Perrault G (1996) The Mouse Defense Test Battery: Evaluation of the effects of non-selective and BZ-1 (ω1) selective, benzodiazepine receptor ligands. Behav Pharmacol 7:560–572.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blanchard DC, Blanchard RJ, Rodgers RJ (1991) Risk assessment and animal models of anxiety. In: Olivier B, Mos J, Slangen JL (eds) Animal Models in Psychopharmacology. Birkhauser Verlag AG, Basel.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Griebel G, Blanchard DC, Jung A, Blanchard RJ (1995) A model of ‘antipredator’ defense in Swiss-Webster mice: Effects of benzodiazepine receptor ligands with different intrinsic activities. Behav Pharmacol 6:732–745.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Griebel G, Blanchard DC, Blanchard RJ (1996) Evidence that the behaviors in the Mouse Defense Test Battery relate to different emotional states: A factor analytic study. Physiol Behav 60:1255–1260.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blanchard RJ, Griebel G, Henrie JA, Blanchard DC (1997) Differentiation of anxiolytic and panicolytic drugs by effects on rat and mouse defense test batteries. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 21:783–789.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    DSM-IV (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. American Psychiatric Association, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deakin JFW, Graeff FG (1991) 5-HT and mechanisms of defense. J Psychopharmacol 5:305–315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Graeff FG (1990) Brain defense system and anxiety. In: Burrows GD, Roth M, Noyes R, Jr. (eds) Handbook of Anxiety. vol. 3. The Neurobiology of Anxiety. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Griebel G, Blanchard DC, Blanchard RJ (1996) Predator-elicited flight responses in Swiss-Webster mice: an experimental model of panic attacks. Prog Neuro-Psych Biol Psych 20:185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Griebel G, Sanger DJ, Perrault G (1997) Genetic differences in the mouse defense test battery. Aggress Behav 23:19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blanchard DC, Griebel G, Blanchard RJ (2003) The Mouse Defense Test Battery: pharmacological and behavioral assays for anxiety and panic. Eur J Pharmacol 463:97–116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sanofi-AventisParisFrance

Personalised recommendations