Skip to main content

Why Cannot a Rodent Be More Like a Man? A Clinical Perspective

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Book cover Animal Models of Movement Disorders

Part of the book series: Neuromethods ((NM,volume 61))

  • 1573 Accesses

Abstract

Neurodegeneration is largely limited to humans, with spontaneous neurodegenerative conditions being extremely rare in animals. However, whole animal models are crucial for a proper understanding of the neurodegenerative process as well as essential for preclinical assessment of novel therapies. Thus, it has been necessary to generate animal models of neurodegeneration using a combination of techniques, including injectable toxins and genetic manipulation. Given the constraints inherent in these approaches, how successful are animal models of neurodegeneration and how can such models be refined in the future?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Massion J (1988) Red nucleus: past and future. Behav Brain Res 28: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  2. de Oliveira RM, Pais TF, Outeiro TF (2010) Sirtuins: common targets in aging and in neurodegeneration. Curr Drug Targets 11: 1270–80

    Google Scholar 

  3. Whitworth AJ (2011) Drosophila models of Parkinson’s disease. Adv Genet 73: 1–50

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brooks SP, Janghra N, Workman VL, Bayram-Weston Z, Jones L, Dunnett SB (2011) Longitudinal analysis of the behavioural phenotype in R6/1 (C57BL/6J) Huntington’s disease transgenic mice. Brain Res Bull, in press

    Google Scholar 

  5. Klein A, Sacrey LA, Dunnett SB, Whishaw IQ, Nikkhah G (2011) Proximal movements compensate for distal forelimb movement impairments in a reach-to-eat task in Huntington’s disease: new insights into motor impairments in a real-world skill. Neurobiol Dis, in press

    Google Scholar 

  6. Venda LL, Cragg SJ, Buchman VL, Wade-Martins R (2010) α-Synuclein and dopamine at the crossroads of Parkinson’s disease. Trends Neurosci 33: 559–68

    Google Scholar 

  7. Magen I, Chesselet MF (2010) Genetic mouse models of Parkinson’s disease: The state of the art. Prog Brain Res 184: 53–87

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dawson TM, Ko HS, Dawson VL (2010) Genetic animal models of Parkinson’s disease. Neuron. 66: 646–61

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ashe KH (2001) Learning and memory in transgenic mice modeling Alzheimer’s disease. Learn Mem 8: 301–8

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen G, Chen KS, Knox J, Inglis J, Bernard A, Martin SJ, Justice A, McConlogue L, Games D, Freedman SB, Morris RG (2000) A learning deficit related to age and beta-amyloid plaques in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 408: 975–9

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li JY, Popovic N, Brundin P (2005) The use of the R6 transgenic mouse models of Huntington’s disease in attempts to develop novel therapeutic strategies. NeuroRx 2: 447–64

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sathasivam K, Hobbs C, Mangiarini L, Mahal A, Turmaine M, Doherty P, Davies SW, Bates GP (1999) Transgenic models of Huntington’s disease. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 354: 963–9

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harvey BK, Richie CT, Hoffer BJ, Airavaara M (2011) Transgenic animal models of neurodegeneration based on human genetic studies. J Neural Transm 118: 27–45

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fricker-Gates RA, Lundberg C, Dunnett SB (2001) Neural transplantation: restoring complex circuitry in the striatum. Restor Neurol Neurosci 19:119–38

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brundin P, Barker RA, Parmar M (2010) Neural grafting in Parkinson’s disease Problems and possibilities. Prog Brain Res 184: 265–94

    Google Scholar 

  16. Macleod MR, Fisher M, O’Collins V, Sena ES, Dirnagl U, Bath PMW, Buchan A, van der Worp H, Traystman R, Minematsu K, Donnan GA, Howells DW (2009) Good laboratory practice: preventing introduction of bias at the bench. Stroke 40: e50–52

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chudasama Y, Robbins TW (2006) Functions of frontostriatal systems in cognition: comparative neuropsychopharmacological studies in rats, monkeys and humans. Biol Psychiat 73: 19–38

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne E. Rosser .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Rosser, A.E. (2011). Why Cannot a Rodent Be More Like a Man? A Clinical Perspective. In: Lane, E., Dunnett, S. (eds) Animal Models of Movement Disorders. Neuromethods, vol 61. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-298-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-298-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-297-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-298-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics