Advertisement

Protease Specificity Profiling by Tandem Mass Spectrometry Using Proteome-Derived Peptide Libraries

  • Oliver Schilling
  • Ulrich auf dem Keller
  • Christopher M. OverallEmail author
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 753)

Abstract

Protease specificity profiling using proteome-derived, database-searchable peptide libraries is a novel approach to define the active site specificity of proteolytic enzymes we call PICS (Proteomic Identification of protease Cleavage Sites). Proteome-derived peptide libraries are generated by trypsin, GluC, or chymotrypsin digestion of biologically relevant proteomes, such as cytosolic lysates, to generate three separate libraries that each differ from the others in their C-terminal amino acid residues according to the protease specificity. Primary amines of all peptides are then chemically protected so that after incubation with a test protease, the neo-N-termini of the prime-side cleavage products with exposed α-amines can be specifically biotinylated, enriched, and identified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The corresponding nonprime-side sequences are derived bioinformatically. Suited for all protease classes except carboxyproteases and those aminoproteases and dipeptidases requiring a free α-amine for cleavage, PICS simultaneously profiles the specificity of prime and nonprime positions and directly determines scissile peptide bonds of up to hundreds of cleavage site sequences in a single experiment. This wealth of sequence specificity information also allows for the investigation of subsite cooperativity. Herein we describe a simplified procedure to produce PICS peptide libraries, the methods to perform a PICS assay, and a new method of data analysis.

Key words

Protease profiling active site specificity protease specificity peptide library subsite cooperativity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Bettina Mayer for technical assistance in establishing the simplified purification protocol. O.S. acknowledges support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (grants SCHI 871/1-1 and 871/2-1) and the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (MSFHR). U.a.d.K. was supported by a DFG research fellowship. C.M.O. is supported by a Canada Research Chair in Metalloproteinase Proteomics and Systems Biology. This work was supported by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and from a program project grant in Breast Cancer Metastases from the Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance (CBCRA) with funds from the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation and the Cancer Research Society as well as with an Infrastructure Grant from MSHFR.

References

  1. 1.
    Schilling, O., and Overall, C. M. (2007) Proteomic discovery of protease substrates, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 11, 36–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schilling, O., and Overall, C. M. (2008) Proteome-derived, database-searchable peptide libraries for identifying protease cleavage sites, Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 685–694.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ridky, T. W., Cameron, C. E., Cameron, J., Leis, J., Copeland, T., Wlodawer, A., Weber, I. T., and Harrison, R. W. (1996) Human immunodeficiency virus, type 1 protease substrate specificity is limited by interactions between substrate amino acids bound in adjacent enzyme subsites, J. Biol. Chem. 271, 4709–4717.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Perkins, D. N., Pappin, D. J., Creasy, D. M., and Cottrell, J. S. (1999) Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data, Electrophoresis 20, 3551–3567.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Craig, R., and Beavis, R. C. (2004) TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra, Bioinformatics 20, 1466–1467.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pedrioli, P. G. A., Eng, J. K., Hubley, R., Vogelzang, M., Deutsch, E. W., Raught, B., Pratt, B., Nilsson, E., Angeletti, R. H., Apweiler, R., Cheung, K., Costello, C. E., Hermjakob, H., Huang, S., Julian, R. K., Kapp, E., McComb, M. E., Oliver, S. G., Omenn, G., Paton, N. W., Simpson, R., Smith, R., Taylor, C. F., Zhu, W., and Aebersold, R. (2004) A common open representation of mass spectrometry data and its application to proteomics research, Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 1459–1466.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pedrioli, P. G. A. (2010) Trans-proteomic pipeline: a pipeline for proteomic analysis, Methods Mol. Biol. 604, 213–238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Kolker, E., and Aebersold, R. (2002) Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search, Anal. Chem. 74, 5383–5392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kersey, P. J., Duarte, J., Williams, A., Karavidopoulou, Y., Birney, E., and Apweiler, R. (2004) The international protein index: an integrated database for proteomics experiments, Proteomics 4, 1985–1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gorodkin, J., Heyer, L. J., Brunak, S., and Stormo, G. D. (1997) Displaying the information contents of structural RNA alignments: the structure logos, Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13, 583–586.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schneider, T. D., and Stephens, R. M. (1990) Sequence logos: a new way to display consensus sequences, Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 6097–6100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Colaert, N., Helsens, K., Martens, L., Vandekerckhove, J., and Gevaert, K. (2009) Improved visualization of protein consensus sequences by iceLogo, Nat. Methods 6, 786–787.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    MacLean, B., Eng, J. K., Beavis, R. C., and McIntosh, M. (2006) General framework for developing and evaluating database scoring algorithms using the TANDEM search engine, Bioinformatics 22, 2830–2832.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schilling, O., Huesgen, P. F., Barré, O., Auf dem Keller, U., and Overall, C. M. (2011) Characterization of the prime and non-prime active site specificities of proteases by proteomederived peptide libraries and tandem mass spectrometry. Nat. Protoc. 6, 111–120.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oliver Schilling
    • 1
  • Ulrich auf dem Keller
    • 2
  • Christopher M. Overall
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute for Molecular Medicine and Cell Research, University of FreiburgFreiburgGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Cell Biology, Swiss Federal Institute of TechnologyZürichSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Oral Biological and Medical SciencesCentre for Blood Research, University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations