Skip to main content

Standardization in Immunohistology

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissues

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 724))

Abstract

The rapid acceptance of immunohistology as an invaluable adjunct to morphologic diagnosis has been possible because of the development of new and more sensitive antibodies and detection systems that allow its application to formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPT). More importantly, antigen-retrieval techniques have resulted in some degree of consistency allowing immunohistology to be used reliably as a diagnostic tool. The advent of prognostic and predictive biomarkers, and the desire for individualized therapy has resulted in mounting pressure to employ the immunohistological assay in a quantitative manner. While it was not a major issue when the technique was employed in a qualitative manner, the numerous variables in the preanalytical and analytical phases of the test procedure that influence the immunoexpression of proteins in FFPT become critical to standardization. Tissue fixation is pivotal to antigen preservation but exposure to fixative prior to accessioning by the laboratory is not controlled. Antigen retrieval, crucial in the analytical phase, continues to be employed in an empirical manner with the actual mechanism of action remaining elusive. There is great variation in reagents, methodology, and duration of tissue processing and immunostaining procedure, and the detection systems employed are not standardized between laboratories. While many of these variables are offset by the application of antigen retrieval, which enables the detection of a wide range of antigens in FFPT, the method itself is not standardized. This myriad of variables makes it inappropriate to provide meaningful comparisons of results obtained in different laboratories and even in the same laboratory, as in current practice, each specimen experiences different preanalytical variables. Furthermore, variables in interpretation exist and cutoff thresholds for positivity differ. Failure to recognize false-positive and false-negative stains leads to further errors of quantitative measurement. Many of the problems relating to the technology and interpretation of immunostaining originate from failure to recognize that this procedure is different from other histological stains and involves many more steps that cannot be monitored until the end result is attained. While several remedial measures can be suggested to address some of these problems, accurate and reproducible quantitative assessment of immunostains presently remains elusive as important variables that impact on antigen preservation in the paraffin-embedded biopsy ­cannot be standardized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Leong, A.S.-Y., Wick, M.R., and Swanson, P.E. (1997) Immunohistology and Electron Microscopy of Anaplastic and Pleomorphic Tumours. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2–35.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Elias, J.M. (2003) Immunohistopathology. A Practical Approach to Diagnosis. Chicago: ASCP Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor, C.R. and Cote, R.J. (2005) Immunomicroscopy, A Tool for the Surgical Pathology, 3rd Edition. Edinburgh: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Leong, A.S.-Y. and Wright, J. (1987) The contributions of immunohistochemical staining in tumour diagnosis. Histopathology 11, 1295–1305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leong, A.S.-Y. and Leong, F.J. (1997) Immunohistochemistry in the Diagnosis of Solid Tumours. IN: Nakamura, R., ed. Manual of Clinical Laboratory Immunology, 5th Edition. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 380–387.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leong, A.S.-Y. (1992) New vistas in the histopathological assessment of cancer. Med J Aust. 157, 699–701.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Leong, A.S.-Y., Vinyuvat, S., Suthipintawong, C., and Leong, F.J. (1997) Patterns of basal lamina immunostaining in soft tissue tumours. Appl Immunohistochem. 5, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leong, A.S.-Y., Parkinson, R., and Milios, J. (1990) ‘Thick’ cell membranes revealed by immunocytochemical staining. A clue to the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma. Diagn Cytopathol. 6, 9–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Leong, A.S.-Y., Stevens, M.W., and Mukherjee, T.M. (1992) Malignant ­mesothelioma: cytologic diagnosis with histologic, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural correlation. Semin Diagn Pathol. 9, 141–150.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Leong, A.S.-Y. and Lee, A.K.C. (1995) Biological indices in the assessment of breast cancer. Clin Mol Pathol. 48, M221–M238.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Leong, A.S.-Y. (2001) Immunohistological markers for tumor prognostication. Curr Diagn Pathol. 7, 176–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bratthauer, G.L., Moinfar, F., Stamatakos, M.D., et al. (2002) Combined E-cadherin and high molecular weight cytokeratin immunoprofile differentiates lobular, ductal, and hybrid mammary intraepithelial neoplasias. Hum Pathol. 33, 620–627.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wood, B. and Leong, A.S.-Y. (2003) Cell adhesion proteins – biology, detection and applications. Pathology 35, 101–105.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ribic, C.M., Sargent, D.J., Moore, M.J., et al. (2003) Tumor microsatellite-instability status as a predictor of benefit from fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 349, 247–257.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Popat, S., Hubner, R., and Houlston, R.S. (2005) Systematic review of microsatellite instability and colorectal cancer prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 23, 609–618.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Acs, G., Lawton, T.J., Rebbeck, T.R., et al. (2001) Differential expression of E-cadherin in lobular and ductal neoplasms of the breast and its biologic and diagnostic implications. Am J Clin Pathol. 115, 85–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fletcher, C.D., Berman, J.J., Corless, C., et al. (2003) Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach. Hum Pathol. 33, 459–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stein, H., Foss H.D., Durkop, H., et al. (2000) CD30+ anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a review of its histopathologic, genetic, and clinical features. Blood 96, 3681–3695.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Leong, A.S.-Y. and Leong, T.Y.-M. (2006) Invited review: newer developments in immunohistology. J Clin Pathol. 59, 1117–1126.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Taylor, C.R. (1994) An exaltation of experts: concerted efforts in the standardization of immunohistochemistry. Hum Pathol. 25, 2–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Leary, T.J. (2001) Standardization in immunohistochemistry. Appl Immunohis­tochem Mol Morphol. 9, 3–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Taylor, C.R. and Levenson, R.M. (2006) Quantification of immunohistochemical – issues concerning methods, utility and semi-quantitative assessment II. Histopathology 49, 411–424.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Goldstein, N.S., Hewitt, S.M., Taylor, C.R., et al. (2007) Recommendations for improved standardization of immunohistochemistry. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 15, 124–133.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pelstring, R.J., Allred, D.C., Esther, R.J., et al. (1991) Differential antigen preservation during autolysis. Hum Pathol. 22, 237–241.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pearse, A.G.E. (1980) Histochemistry. Theoretical and Applied, 4th Edition, vol 1. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 95.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Leong, A.S.-Y. and Gilham, P.N. (1989) The effects of progressive formaldehyde fixation on the preservation of tissue antigens. Pathology 21, 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Goldstein, N.S., Ferkowicz, M., Odish, E., et al. (2003) Minimum formalin fixation time for consistent estrogen receptor immunohistochemical staining of invasive breast carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 120, 86–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Raymond, W. and Leong, A.S.-Y. (1990) Oestrogen receptor staining of paraffin-embedded breast carcinomas following short fixation in formalin: a comparison with ­cytosolic and frozen section receptor analyses. J Pathol. 160, 295–303.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Leong, A.S.-Y. and Milios, J. (1993) An assessment of the efficacy of the microwave-antigen retrieval procedure on a range of ­tissue antigens. Appl Immunohistochem. 1, 267–274.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Leong, A.S.-Y. and Milios, J. (1993) Comparison of antibodies to oestrogen and progesterone receptors and the influence on microwave-antigen retrieval. Appl Immunohistochem. 1, 2–88.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Leong, A.S.-Y., Milios, J., and Duncis, C.G. (1988) Antigen preservation in microwave-irradiated tissues. A comparison with routine formalin fixation. J Pathol. 156, 275–282.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Suthipintawong, C., Vinyuvat, S., and Leong, A.S.-Y. (1996) Immunostaining of cell preparations: a comparative evaluation of common fixatives and protocols. Diagn Cytopathol. 15, 167–174.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Larsson, L. (1993) Tissue preparation methods for light microscopic immunohistochemistry. Appl Immunohistochem. 1, 2–16.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Leong, A.S.-Y. (1994) Fixation and Fixatives. IN: Woods, A.E., Ellis, R.C., eds. Laboratory Histopathology – A Complete Reference. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gown, A.M. and Vogel, A.M. (1984) Monoclonal antibodies to human intermediate filament proteins. II. Distribution of filament proteins in normal human tissues. Am J Pathol. 114, 309–321.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Shi, S.R., Liu, C., Pootrakul, L., et al. (2006) Evaluation of the value of frozen tissue section used as ‘gold standard’ for immunohistochemistry. Am J Clin Pathol. 129, 358–366.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kakimoto, K., Takekoshi, S., Miyajima, K., and Osamura, R.Y. (2008) Hypothesis for the mechanism for heat-induced antigen retrieval occurring on fresh frozen sections without formalin fixation in immunohistochemistry. J Mol Histol. 39, 389–399.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Visinoni, F., Milios, J., Leong, A.S.-Y., et al. (1998) Ultra-rapid microwave/variable pressure induced histoprocessing: description of a new tissue processor. J Histotechnol. 21, 219–224.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Morales, A.R., Nassiri, M., Kanhoush, R., et al. (2004) Experience with an automated microwave assisted rapid tissue processing method: effect on histology and timeliness of diagnostic surgical pathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 121, 528–536.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jacobs, T.W., Prioleau, J.E., Stillman, I.E., et al. (1996) Loss of tumor marker-immunostaining intensity on stored paraffin slides of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 88, 1054–1060.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Wester, K., Wahlund, E., Sundstrom, C., et al. (2000) Paraffin section storage and immunohistochemistry. Effects of time, temperature, fixation, and retrieval protocol with emphasis on p53 protein and MIB1 antigen. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 8, 61–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. DiVito, K.A., Charette, L.A., Rimm, D.L., and Camp, R.L. (2004) Long-term preservation of antigenicity on tissue microarrays. Lab Invest. 84, 1071–1078.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Blind, C., Koepenik, A., Pacyna-Gengelbach, M., et al. (2008) Antigenicity testing by immunohistochemistry after tissue oxidation. J Clin Pathol. 61, 79–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Leong, A.S.-Y. (1993) Immunohistochemistry – Theoretical and Practical Aspects. IN: Leong, A.S.-Y., ed. Applied Immunohis­tochemistry for the Surgical Pathologist. London: Edward Arnold; 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sabattini, E., Bisgaard, K., Ascani, S., et al. (1998) The EnVision system. A new immunohistochemical method for diagnostics and research: critical comparison with the APAAP, ChemMate, CSA, LABC, and SABC techniques. J Clin Pathol. 51, 506–510.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. King, G., Payne, S., Walker, F., et al. (1998) A highly sensitive detection method for immunohistochemistry using biotinylated tyramine. J Pathol. 183, 237–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Shi, S.R., Key, M.E., and Kalra, K.L. (1991) Antigen retrieval in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues: an enhancement method for immunohistochemical staining based on microwave oven heating of tissue sections. J Histochem Cytochem. 39, 741–748.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Gown, A.M., de Wever, N., and Battifora, H. (1993) Microwave-based antigenic ­unmasking: a revolutionary new technique for routine immunohistochemistry. Appl Immunohistochem. 1, 256–266.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Miller, R.T., Swanson, P.E., and Wick, M.R. (2000) Fixation and epitope retrieval in diagnostic immunohistochemistry: a concise review with practical considerations. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 8, 228–235.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Leong, A.S-Y., Milios, J., and Leong, F.J. (1996) Epitope retrieval with microwaves: a comparison of citrate buffer and EDTA with three commercial retrieval solutions. Appl Immunohistochem. 4, 201–207.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Chaiwun, B., Shi, S.R., Cote, R.J., and Taylor, C.R. (2000) Major Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Antigen Retrieval Immunohistochemistry. IN: Shi, S.R., Gu, J., Taylor, C.R., eds. Antigen Retrieval Techniques. Natick, MA: Eaton Publishing; 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Leong, A.S.-Y., Lee, E.S., Yin, H., et al. (2002) Superheating antigen retrieval. Appl Immunohistochem. 10, 263–268.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Fraenkel-Conrat, H., Brandon, B., and Olcott, H. (1947) The reaction of formaldehyde with proteins. IV: Participation of indole groups: gramicidin. J Biol Chem. 168, 99–118.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Fraenkel-Conrat, H. and Olcott, H. (1948) Reaction of formaldehyde with proteins. VI: Crosslinking between amino groups with phenol, imidazole, or indole groups. J Biol Chem. 174, 827–843.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Fraenkel-Conrat, H. and Olcott, H. (1948) The reaction of formaldehyde with proteins. V: Crosslinking between amino and primary amide or guanidyl groups. J Am Chem Soc. 70, 2673–2684.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Shi, S.-R., Gu, J., Turrens, J., et al. (2000) Development of the Antigen Retrieval Technique: Philosophical and Theoretical Bases. IN: Shi, S.-R., Gu, J., Taylor, C.R., eds. Antigen Retrieval Techniques: Immuno­histochemical and Molecular Morphology. Natick, MA: Eaton Publishing; 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Cattoretti, G., Peleri, S., Parravicini, C., et al. (1993) Antigen unmasking on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. J Pathol. 171, 83–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Suurmeijer, A.J.H. and Boon, M.E. (1993) Notes on the application of microwaves for antigen retrieval in paraffin and plastic tissue sections. Eur J Morphol. 31, 144–150.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Morgan, J.M., Navabi, H., and Jasani, B. (1997) Role of calcium chelation in high-temperature antigen retrieval at different pH values. J Pathol. 182, 233–237.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Hjerpe, A., Boon, M.E., and Kok, L.P. (1988) Microwave stimulation of an immunological reaction (CEA/anti-CEA) and its use in immunohistochemistry. Histochem J. 20, 388–396.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Choi, T.-S., Whittlesey, M., Slap, S.E., et al. (1997) Microwave Immunocytochemistry: Advances in Temperature Control. IN: Gu, J., ed. Analytical Morphology: Theory, Applica­tions, and Protocols. Natick, MA: Eaton Publishing; 91–114.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Takes, P.A., Kohrs, J., Krug, R., and Kewley, S. (1999) Microwave technology in ­immunohistochemistry: application to avidin-biotin staining of diverse antigens. J Histotechnol. 12, 95–98.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Hopwood, D., Yeaman, G., and Milne, G. (1988) Differentiating the effects of microwave and heat on tissue proteins and their cross linking by formaldehyde. Histochem J. 20, 341–346.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Porcelli, M., Cacciapuoti, G., Fusco, S., et al. (1997) Non-thermal effects of microwaves on proteins: thermophilic enzymes as model system. FEBS Lett. 402, 102–106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Sompuram, S.R., Vani, K., and Bogen, S.A. (2006) A molecular model of antigen retrieval using a peptide array. Am J Clin Pathol. 25, 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Sompuram, S.R., Vani, K., Messana, E., and Bogen, S.A. (2004) A molecular mechanism of formalin fixation and antigen retrieval. Am J Clin Pathol. 121, 190–199.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Leong, A.S.-Y., Haffajee, Z., and Clark, M. (2007) Microwave enhancement of CISH for Her2 oncogene. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 15, 88–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Portiansky, E.L. and Gimeno, E.J. (1996) A new epitope retrieval method for the detection of structural cytokeratins in the bovine prostate tissue. Appl Immunohistochem. 4, 208–214.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Leong, A.S.-Y. (2005) Microwave Technology for Light Microscopy and Ultrastructural Studies. Bangkok: Amarin Printing and Publishing Company Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Leong, A.S.-Y., Yin, H., and Haffajee, Z. (2002) Patterns of immunostaining of immunoglobulin in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 10, 110–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Taylor, C.R., Shi, S.R., Chen, C., et al. (1996) Comparative study of antigen retrieval heating methods: microwave, microwave and pressure cooker, autoclave and steamer. Biotech Histochem. 71, 263–270.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Shi, S.R., Imam, S.A., Young, L., Cote, R.J., and Taylor, C.R. (1995) Antigen retrieval immunohistochemistry under the influence of pH using monoclonal antibodies. J Histochem Cytochem. 43, 193–201.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Lan, H.Y., Mu, W., Nikolic-Paterson, D.J., and Atkins, R.C. (1995) A novel, simple, reliable, and sensitive method for multiple immunoenzyme staining: use of microwave oven heating to block antibody cross reactivity and retrieve antigens. J Histochem Cytochem. 43, 97–102.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Gao, C., Wang, A.Y., and Han, Y.J. (2008) Microwave antigen retrieval blocks endogenous peroxidase activity in immunohistochemistry. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 16, 393–399.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Leong, A.S.-Y., Milios, J., and Tang, S.K. (1993) Is immunolocalisation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in paraffin sections a valid index of cell proliferation? Appl Immunohistochem. 1, 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Leong, A.S.-Y., Vinyuvat, S., Suthipintawong, C., and Milios, J. (1995) A comparative study of cell proliferation markers in breast carcinomas. Clin Mol Pathol. 48, M83–M87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Willingham, M.C. (1999) Conditional epitopes: is your antibody always specific? J Histochem Cytochem. 47, 1233–1239.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Burry, R.W. (2000) Specificity controls for immunocytochemical methods. J Histochem Cytochem. 48, 163–168.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Riera, J., Simpson, J.F., Tamayo, R., et al. (1999) Use of cultured cells as a control for quantitative immunocytochemical analysis of estrogen receptor in breast cancer. The Quicgel method. Am J Clin Pathol. 111, 329–332.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Taylor, C.R. (2006) Personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  81. McGuire, W.L. (1991) Breast cancer prognostic factors: evaluation guidelines. J Natl Cancer Inst. 83, 154–155.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Wolff, A.C., Hammond, M.E., Schwartz, J.N., et al. (2007) American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 25, 118–145.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Vogel, C.L., Cobleigh, M.A., Tripathy, D., et al. (2002) Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab as a single agent in first-line treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 20, 719–726.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Leong, T.Y.-M. and Leong, A.S.-Y. (2006) Controversies in the assessment of HER-2. More questions than answers. Adv Anat Pathol. 13, 263–269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Dybdal, N., Leiberman, G., Anderson, S., et al. (2005) Determination of HER2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization and concordance with the clinical trials immunohistochemical assay in women with metastatic breast cancer evaluated for treatment with trastuzumab. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 93, 3–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Perez, E.A., Suman, V.J., Davidson, N.E., et al. (2006) HER2 testing by local, central, and reference laboratories in specimens from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 intergroup adjuvant trial. J Clin Oncol. 24, 3032–3038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Rhodes, A., Jasani, B., Balaton, A.J., et al. (2001) Study of interlaboratory reliability and reproducibility of estrogen and progesterone receptor assays in Europe. Documentation of poor reliability and identification of ­insufficient microwave antigen retrieval time as a major contributory element of unreliable results. Am J Clin Pathol. 115, 44–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Fitzgibbons, P.L., Murphy, D.A., Dorfman, D.M., et al. (2006) Interlaboratory ­comparison of immunohistochemical testing for HER2: results of the 2004 and 2005 College of American Pathologists HER2 Immunohistochemistry Tissue Microarray Survey. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 130, 1440–1445.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Leong, A.S.-Y. (2004) Pitfalls in diagnostic immunohistology. Adv Anat Pathol. 11, 86–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Smith, P.S., Parkinson, I.H., and Leong, A.S.-Y. (1996) Principles of ploidy analysis by static cytometry. Clin Mol Pathol. 49, M104–M111.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Seidal, T., Balaton, A.J., and Battifora, H. (2001) Interpretation and quantification of immunostains. Am J Surg Pathol. 25, 1204–1207.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Leong, A.S.-Y. (2004) Quantitation in immunohistology: fact or fiction? A discussion of variables that influence results. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 12, 1–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Cooper, K., Haffajee, Z., and Taylor, L. (1997) Comparative analysis of biotin intranuclear inclusions of gestational endometrium using the APAAP, ABC and PAP immunodetection systems. J Clin Pathol. 50, 153–156.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Penault-Llorca, F., Cayre, A., Arnould, L., et al. (2006) Is there an immunohistochemical technique definitely valid in epidermal growth factor assessment? Oncol Rep. 16, 1173–1179.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Hirsch, F.R., Dziadziuszko, R., Thacher, N., et al. (2008) Epidermal growth factor receptor immunohistochemistry: comparison of antibodies and cutoff points to predict benefit from gefitinib in a phase 3 placebo-controlled study in advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Cancer 112, 1114–1121.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Cappuzzo, F., Finocchiaro, G., Rossi, E., et al. (2008) EGFR FISH assay predicts for response to cetuximab in chemotherapy refractory colorectal cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 19, 717–723.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Cunningham, D., Humblet, Y., Siena, S., et al. (2004) Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 351, 337–345.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Saltz, L.B., Meropol, N.J., Loehrer, P.J., et al. (2004) Phase II trial of cetuximab in patients with refractory colorectal cancer that expresses the epidermal growth factor receptor. J Clin Oncol. 22, 1201–1208.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Goldstein, N.S. and Amin, M. (2001) Epidermal growth factor receptor immunohistochemical reactivity in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage IV colon adenocarcinoma: implications for a standardized scoring system. Cancer 92, 1331–1346.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Tos, A.P. and Ellis, I. (2005) Assessing epidermal growth factor receptor expression in tumours: what is the value of current test methods? Eur J Cancer. 41, 1383–1392.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Sabourin, J.C., Cayre, A., Arnould, L., et al. (2005) Comparison of three commercially available immunohistochemical tests for EGFR expression in clorectal cancers. Is immunohistochemistry (IHC) reliable? J Clin Oncol. 23(June Suppl), 9705–9710.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Barnes, D.M., Harris, W.H., Smith, P., et al. (1996) Immunohistochemical determination of oestrogen receptor: comparison of ­different methods of assessment of staining and correlation with clinical outcome of breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 74, 1445–1451.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Allred, D.C., Harvey, J.M., Berardo, M., et al. (1998) Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. Mod Pathol. 11, 155–168.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Hervey, J.M., Clark, G.M., Osborne, C.K., et al. (1999) Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 17, 1474–1481.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Collins, L.C., Botero, M.L., and Schnitt, S.J. (2005) Bimodal frequency distribution of estrogen receptor immunohistochemical staining results in breast cancer: an analysis of 825 cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 123, 16–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Nadji, M. (2006) Quantitative immunohistochemistry of estrogen receptor in breast cancer. Much ado about nothing. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 16, 105–107.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Jacobs, T.W., Gown, A.M., Yazji, H., et al. (1999) Specificity of HercepTest in determining HER-2/neu status of breast cancers using the United States Food and Drug Administration-approved scoring system. J Clin Oncol. 17, 1983–1987.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Allred, D.C. and Swanson, P.E. (2000) Testing for erbB-2 by immunohistochemistry in breast cancer. Am J Clin Pathol. 113, 171–175.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Vincent-Salomon, A., MacGrogan, G., Couturier, J., et al. (2003) Calibration of immunohistochemistry for assessment of Her2/neu in breast cancer: results of the French Multicentre GEFPICS Study. Histopathology 42, 337–347.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Paik, S., Bryant, J., and Tan-Chiu, E., et al. (2002) Real-world performance of HER2 testing – National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project experience. J Natl Cancer Inst. 94, 852–854.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Roche, P.C., Suman, V.J., Jenkins, R.B., et al. (2002) Concordance between local and central laboratory HER2 testing in the Breast Intergroup Trial N9831. J Natl Cancer Inst. 94, 855–857.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Miller, K. and Ibrahim, M. (2004) The breast HER-2 module. Immunocytochemistry 3, 147–150.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Leong, A.S.-Y., Formby, M., Haffajee, Z., and Morey, A. (2006) Refinement of immunohistological parameters for Her2/neu scoring. Validation by FISH and CISH. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 14, 384–389.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Nagy, P., Jenei, A., Kirsch, A.K., et al. (1999) Activation-dependent clustering of the erbB2 receptor tyrosine kinase detected by scanning near-field optical microscopy. J Cell Sci. 112, 1733–1741.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Zlobec, I., Steele, R., Michel, R.P., et al. (2006) Scoring of p53, VEGF, Bcl-2 and APAF-1 immunohistochemistry and interobserver reliability in colorectal cancer. Mod Pathol. 19, 1236–1242.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Zlobec, I., Terracciano, L., Jass, J.R., and Lugli, A. (2007) Value of staining intensity in the interpretation of immunohistochemistry for tumor markers in colorectal cancer. Virchows Arch. 451, 763–769.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Kay, E.W., Walsh, C.J., Whelan, D., et al. (1996) Interobserver variation of p53 immunohistochemistry – an assessment of a practical problem and comparison with other studies. Br J Biomed Sci. 53, 101–107.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Leong, T.Y.-M. and Leong, A.S.-Y. (2007) Variables that influence outcomes in immunohistology. Aust J Med Sci. 28, 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony S.-Y. Leong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Leong, A.SY., Leong, T.YM. (2011). Standardization in Immunohistology. In: Al-Mulla, F. (eds) Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissues. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 724. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-055-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-055-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-054-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-055-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics