Skip to main content

Laboratory Data and Sample Management for Proteomics

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Book cover Data Mining in Proteomics

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 696))

Abstract

Proteomic experiments can be difficult to handle because of the large amount of data in different formats that is generated. Samples need to be managed and generated, data needs to be integrated with samples and annotation information. A laboratory information management system (LIMS) can be used to overcome some of the data handling problems. In this chapter, we discuss the role of a LIMS in the proteomics laboratory, and show two step-by-step examples of usage of the Proteios Software Environment (ProSE) to handle two different proteomics workflows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hamacher M, Stephan C, Meyer HE, Eisenacher M (2009) Data handling and processing in proteomics. Expert Rev Proteomics 6:217–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Piggee C (2008) LIMS and the art of MS proteomics. Anal Chem 80:4801–4806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Häkkinen J, Vincic G, Månsson O, Wårell K, Levander F (2009) The proteios software environment: an extensible multiuser platform for management and analysis of proteomics data. J Proteome Res 8:3037–3043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stephan, C., Kohl, M., Turewicz, M., Podwojski, K., Meyer, H.E., Eisenacher, M (2010) Using laboratory information management systems as central part of a proteomics data workflow. Proteomics 10:1230–1249

    Google Scholar 

  5. Martens L, Hermjakob H, Jones P, Adamski M, Taylor C, States D et al (2005) PRIDE: The proteomics identifications database. Proteomics 5:3537–3545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thompson A, Schafer J, Kuhn K, Kienle S, Schwarz J, Schmidt G et al (2003) Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. Anal Chem 75:1895–1904

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Orchard S, Taylor C, Hermjakob H, Zhu W, Julian R, Apweiler R (2004) Current status of proteomic standards development. Expert Rev Proteomics 1:179–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Martens, L., Chambers, M., Sturm, M., Kessner, D., Levander, F., Shofstahl, J., et al. (2010) mzML – A community standard for mass spectrometry Mol Cell Proteomics doi:10.1074/mcp.R110.000133

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kessner D, Chambers M, Burke R, Agus D, Mallick P (2008) Proteowizard: open source software for rapid proteomics tools development. Bioinformatics 24:2534–2536

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Elias JE, Gygi SP (2007) Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat Meth 4:207–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Levander F, Krogh M, Wårell K, Gärdén P, James P, Häkkinen J (2007) Automated reporting from gel-based proteomics experiments using the open source Proteios database application. Proteomics 7:668–674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Reidegeld KA, Eisenacher M, Kohl M, Chamrad D, Korting G, Blueggel M et al (2008) An easy-to-use Decoy Database Builder software tool, implementing different decoy strategies for false discovery rate calculation in automated MS/MS protein identifications. Proteomics 8:1129–1137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilkins MR, Appel RD, Van Eyk JE, Chung MCM, Gorg A, Hecker M et al (2006) Guidelines for the next 10 years of proteomics. Proteomics 6:4–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Taylor CF, Paton NW, Lilley KS, Binz P-A, Julian RK, Jones AR et al (2007) The minimum information about a proteomics experiment (MIAPE). Nat Biotechnol 25:887–893

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Häkkinen, J., Levander, F. (2011). Laboratory Data and Sample Management for Proteomics. In: Hamacher, M., Eisenacher, M., Stephan, C. (eds) Data Mining in Proteomics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 696. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-987-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-987-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60761-986-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60761-987-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics